search for: johannes

Hi Johannes: Thank you very much. Rkward now works. The only drawback is that I had to install it "by hand": sudo dpkg -i rkward_0.6.5-1~stretchcran.0_amd64.deb rkward-data_0.6.5-1~stretchcran.0_all.deb By default, apt-get installed the Debian repository version (rkward 0.6.5-1+b1 0.6.5-1+b1)....

...ks. as to the format of the list, we previously had a list of feature for 4.5 (before it was fully supported), we can reuse this old format. Best regards, Alexey Bataev > 6 июня 2019 г., в 19:12, Narayanaswamy, Ravi <ravi.narayanaswamy at intel.com> написал(а): > > Alexey, > Johannes want to put all the features maintained in Kelvin's spreadsheet on the website and track it there. He is not looking for just features which have been worked on. > Thanks > Ravi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Bataev [mailto:a.bataev at hotmail.com] > Sent: Th...

Hello Johannes: I'm sorry, but I still have the same problem with Rkward. After running apt-get update, I still can not find the amd64 version of the Rkward package. I have tried it with the following sources: deb http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian stretch-cran34/ deb http://chem.uft.uni-...

tweaked the wrapper script to make it work. It seems like the sa-learn call silently fails: "/usr/local/bin/sa-learn-pipe.sh" 10L, 350C geschrieben root at vm10:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# cat /tmp/sa-learn-pipe.log starting log 25200-start (--username=johannes at rohr.org --spam) libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work 25200-end Does the above error message have anything to do with it? Running the script & sa-learn manually works fine. do virtual users change something how dovecot calls programs, such as chrooting them? Cheers,...

I don't know where it comes from, currently there is just 2 patches with the new functionality : mapper implementation in clang and in the runtime. Plus the patch for unified memory. Best regards, Alexey Bataev > 6 июня 2019 г., в 19:03, Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov> написал(а): > >> On 06/06, Alexey Bataev via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hmm, it is interesting. What's missing? and why it is "a lot". > > I have a list with ~50-60 features and ~15 have a review link assigned. > I don't have the &qu...

...alized machines this fails because the host CPU name implies AVX, however AVX is in fact disabled, leading to an illegal instruction when running JIT-compiled functions. Is there a better way to set up the executionengine so that such failure do not occur (but all available features are used)? -- Johannes S. Mueller-Roemer, MSc Wiss. Mitarbeiter - Interactive Engineering Technologies (IET) Fraunhofer-Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung IGD Fraunhoferstr. 5 | 64283 Darmstadt | Germany Tel +49 6151 155-606 | Fax +49 6151 155-139 johannes.mueller-roemer at igd.fraunhofer.de | www.igd.fra...

Thanks Johannes to clarify this point. It makes more sense to me now. So I understand that the idea is to make it simpler without apt-pinning for less adventurous people (I mean normal people :)): just add jessie-cran3 repo and you're good to go. Am I also correct that jessie-cran3 is essentially a backpor...

Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 15:03:54 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes: > > Am Montag, 29. April 2019, 13:44:03 CEST schrieb Kurt Hornik: > >> >>>>> Johannes Ranke writes: > >> Thanks. You may have seen that with current gfortran in > >> testing/unstable, there are problems with the R BLAS/LAPACK API entrie...

...n CMakeLists.txt. So if it doesn’t work with cmake 3.1/3.2 then that looks like something new that was introduced after 2.8.12.2. I’ll have a look at this to try and figure out what’s going on. John From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Mueller-Roemer, Johannes Sebastian via llvm-dev Sent: 06 October 2015 08:50 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Extra space in LLVM_DEFINITIONS causes CMake 3.1 to fail Correction, I was accidentally testing with an old version for my CMake 3.2+ tests. They fail just the same with the current version...

...ich, unsurprisingly, fails. Although this issue is fixed in current CMake versions (3.2+), do we really want to require these versions just to have LLVM_DEFINITIONS defined as a string instead of a list? A simple check if LLVM_DEFINITIONS is empty in add_llvm_definitions might solve the issue. -- Johannes S. Mueller-Roemer, MSc Wiss. Mitarbeiter - Interactive Engineering Technologies (IET) Fraunhofer-Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung IGD Fraunhoferstr. 5 | 64283 Darmstadt | Germany Tel +49 6151 155-606 | Fax +49 6151 155-139 johannes.mueller-roemer at igd.fraunhofer.de | www.igd.fra...

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Mueller-Roemer, Johannes Sebastian <Johannes.Sebastian.Mueller-Roemer at igd.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Adding -D__MSVCRT_VERSION__=0x900 (or higher) to CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS and > -lmsvcr90 (or higher) to CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_LIBRARIES appears to work. > -lmsvcrt80 does not work, contrary to the comment on the MinGW b...

It is my actual target architecture ________________________________ From: Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2019 1:30 PM To: J S Cc: via llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Generating object files more efficiently I copied "-march=XYZ" from your original email, you have to replace it with your actual target architecture or simply drop it....

On 05/12/2019 11:00 a.m., Johann R. Kleinbub wrote: > It's been three months without an answer, is it ok to thread bump? > Would someone provide a pointer? I agree it's a bug, and agree with your analysis. You should report it on bugs.r-project.org. (If you don't have an account there, let us know, and either someone will give you one, or someone will report it for you.)

...[[1]] $m [1] 4 $v [1] 5 $line [1] c(2,3,4) ... thats Names[1,] I can not do it with a loop since I need to execute this list construction way too often. So I need a speedy solution. Would be great if someone could help me, this really keeps me away from resolving the true issues. Regards, Johannes ******************************************************************** Dr. Johannes Reichl Project Manager Energy Institute at the Johannes Kepler University Linz Altenberger Stra?e 69 A-4040 Linz Tel.: +43-732-2468-5652 Fax: +43-732-2468-5651 Email: reichl at energieinstitut-linz.at Web: w...

-march for clang and -march for llc do different things unfortunately. -march for clang at least on x86 is the same as -mcpu in llc. Which is an artifact of gcc compatibility. ~Craig On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 1:40 PM Doerfert, Johannes via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Oh, my bad. > > > Idk why llc seems to know that architecture but clang does not. > > Doesn't make sense to me, sorry. > ------------------------------ > *From:* J S <mm92126 at hotmail.com> > *Sent:* Sa...

Long story short: We want to create a webpage under llvm.org that shows the implementation status of OpenMP features, similar to https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html . Please let me know if you have wishes, questions, or concerns. Cheers, Johannes

...ts like: c("a1","a2","a2") and c("b1","b2,"b2"). So there is always a first part with a+number and a second part with b+number. Unfortunately there is no separator I could use to directly split the vectors.. Any idea how to handle such cases? /Johannes

...And the same holds true for most other Find${NAME}.cmake scripts I had a look at (Boost, Bullet, CUDA, Freetype, XMLRPC, Zlib). I'll admit there are 1 or 2 exceptions (such as OpenGL) but in general I think it would be better to stick to the more common/conventional case. Thoughts? Regards Johannes Fraunhofer-Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung IGD Fraunhoferstr. 5 | 64283 Darmstadt | Germany Tel +49 6151 155-606 | Fax +49 6151 155-139 johannes.mueller-roemer at igd.fraunhofer.de<mailto:johannes.mueller-roemer at igd.fraunhofer.de> | www.igd.fraunhofer.de<http://www.igd...

Hallo Im using CentOS 7 Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version Thanks Johann Fock Von meinem iPad gesendet

...hich calculates the ModRefBehaviours OnlyReadsPointerArguments and OnlyAccessesPointerArguments? I tried to find one but so far I only saw that different AA's return OnlyReadsMemory and DoesNotAccessMemory if the readonly and readnone attributes are set. Best regards and thanks in advance, Johannes -- Johannes Doerfert Researcher / PhD Student Compiler Design Lab (Prof. Hack) Saarland University, Computer Science Building E1.3, Room 4.26 Tel. +49 (0)681 302-57521 : doerfert at cs.uni-saarland.de Fax. +49 (0)681 302-3065 : http://www.cdl.uni-saarland.de/people/doerfert -------------- nex...