Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "jno".
Did you mean:
jne
2007 Jun 12
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM binaries for Windows and more
...compute overflow manually with
> arithmetic after you do the operations you need. In time LLVM will be
> extended to support this capability.
>
Ok, but I fear the optimizer is not smart enough to produce something like:
a+b -->
mov eax, a
add eax, b
jno theEnd
call raiseOverflow
theEnd:
It is not critical though - I turn off overflow checking after debugging anyway.
> > 2.) The version 2.0 of your source code does not compile with Microsoft
> > Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition. (By the way, is it documented that...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...ON__.21073>:
> 439: 72 74 jb 4af <.str5>
> - 43b: 78 5f js 49c <__FUNCTION__.21766+0x1c>
> + 43b: 78 5f js 49c <__FUNCTION__.21679+0x1c>
> 43d: 65 gs
> 43e: 71 75 jno 4b5 <.str5+0x6>
> 440: 61 popa
> @@ -11707,25 +11707,25 @@
> 449: 6d insl (%dx),%es:(%edi)
> 44a: 72 65 jb 4b1 <.str5+0x2>
> 44c: 66 5f pop %di
> - 44e: 70 00 jo...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking