search for: jmm

best described here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64689 Confirmed also present with the rpm build at http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/binaries/redhat/rsync-2.4.6-1.i386.rpm Please cc: me on replies (I'm not on the list, yet - my procmailrc's in a major state of flux as I'm switching machines) and/or add comments to the above bugzilla entry James -- James

...when I try to debug "target does not support mc emission" in linux (the same code executes OK in windows): Below is a snippet extracted from this method, if (UseMCJIT && ExecutionEngine::MCJITCtor) { ExecutionEngine *EE = ExecutionEngine::MCJITCtor(M, ErrorStr, JMM, OptLevel, AllocateGVsWithCode, TM); if (EE) return EE; } else if (ExecutionEngine::JITCtor) { ExecutionEngine *EE = ExecutionEngine::JITCtor(M, ErrorStr, JMM, OptLevel, AllocateGVsWithCode, TM);...

Am 04.06.2013 16:05, schrieb David Tweed: > | I am curious about JMM->invalidInstructionCache(), which I found in > | lli.cpp implementation. lli.cpp contains also call finalizeObject(), I > | just overlooked it. lli.cpp calls finalizeObject(), which calls > | applyPermissions, which in turn calls invalidateInstructionCache. So why > | lli.cpp does ca...

Hi all, I tried to modify Kaleidoscope Tutorial (toy.cpp from llvm/examples/Kaleidoscope/Chapter7, LLVM 3.3 release branch) in order to use MCJIT instead of JIT. I get segmentation fault when running toy.cpp with fibonacci example from the tutorial. My modified toy.cpp is in attachment and still works with JIT (when #define USE_MCJIT line is commented out). I read discussions regarding

...-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/JITMemoryManager.h?view=markup and see if inheriting from that and overriding allocateGlobal() will do what you want. I'm a little surprised the boehm gc doesn't already see the globals, since there's a reference to their memory from the JMM, but maybe it doesn't scan mmap regions by default. On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:12 AM, James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> wrote: > I've implemented this by adding calls to GC_add_roots(<first global in > module>,<last global in module>+1) to the llvm.global_ctors...

Hi Andrew, Am 04.06.2013 02:13, schrieb Kaylor, Andrew: > Hi Dmitri, > > You might want to try replacing the call to JMM->invalidInstructionCache() with a call to TheExecutionEngine->finalizeObject(). If you are getting a non-NULL pointer from getPointerToFunction but it crashes when you try to call it, that is most likely because the memory for the generated code has not been marked as executable. That happe...

...-Original Message----- From: Dmitri Rubinstein [mailto:dmitri.rubinstein at googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 7:20 AM To: David Tweed Cc: Kaylor, Andrew; LLVM Dev Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MCJIT and Kaleidoscope Tutorial Am 04.06.2013 16:05, schrieb David Tweed: > | I am curious about JMM->invalidInstructionCache(), which I found in > | lli.cpp implementation. lli.cpp contains also call finalizeObject(), > | I just overlooked it. lli.cpp calls finalizeObject(), which calls > | applyPermissions, which in turn calls invalidateInstructionCache. So > | why lli.cpp doe...

...unctionPassManagerImpl::doInitialization (this=0x53934c0, M=@0x1902d20) at PassManager.cpp:1111 #8 0x006b4ecb in llvm::FunctionPassManager::doInitialization (this=0x5395724) at PassManager.cpp:1094 #9 0x0036f6a8 in llvm::JIT::JIT (this=0x53956b0, MP=0x5395170, tm=@0x21ec400, tji=@0x21ec588, JMM=0x0) at JIT.cpp:101 #10 0x0036f6e9 in llvm::JIT::JIT (this=0x53956b0, MP=0x5395170, tm=@0x21ec400, tji=@0x21ec588, JMM=0x0) at JIT.cpp:102 #11 0x00375971 in llvm::JIT::createJIT (MP=0x5395170, ErrorStr=0x0, JMM=0x0) at TargetSelect.cpp:75 #12 0x0037667e in llvm::JIT::create (MP=0x5395170, Err=0...

Hi Dmitri, You might want to try replacing the call to JMM->invalidInstructionCache() with a call to TheExecutionEngine->finalizeObject(). If you are getting a non-NULL pointer from getPointerToFunction but it crashes when you try to call it, that is most likely because the memory for the generated code has not been marked as executable. That happe...

(copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious) On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote: > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be overkill. Would it? I thought irqbalance is actually required even for native with modern kernels, since the kernel doesn't do any...

...and hope I'll have a nice time here. one of my servers running samba+ldap is not working properly. the setup is: Debian 5 fileserver:/etc/samba#smbd --version Version 3.0.24 fileserver:/etc/samba# slapd -V @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.30 (Oct 5 2008 22:08:58) $ jmm@galadriel:/home/jmm/ldap/openldap2.3-2.3.30/debian/build/servers/slapd After a samba upgrade via apt-get, the user could not access their shared folders anymore. Looking at the logs i'd saw some strage things: smbd.log: ===============================================================...

Package: xen Severity: important Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, This issue is still unfixed in Wheezy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-2625 Patch: http://xenbits.xensource.com/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/60f09d1ab1fe Cheers, Moritz

Hi, In ExecutionEngine.cpp, when the JIT or the Interpreter have not been linked in then EngineBuilder::create fails without setting ErrorStr. I've attached a patch to fix this. Warm Regards KS Sreeram -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ee-not-linked-in-msg.diff URL:

...g called. If I break in ExecutionEngine::create, I can see that UseMCJIT is true and ExecutionEngine::MCJITCtor is non-zero. Still at this point (lines after 481): if (UseMCJIT && ExecutionEngine::MCJITCtor) { ExecutionEngine *EE = ExecutionEngine::MCJITCtor(M, ErrorStr, JMM, AllocateGVsWithCode, TheTM.take()); if (EE) return EE; } else if (ExecutionEngine::JITCtor) { ExecutionEngine *EE = ExecutionEngine::JITCtor(M, ErrorStr, JMM, AllocateGVsWithCode, TheTM.take()); if (E...

...ged all the configuration files on both Linux and Windows, so the old hostname is definitely not lurking anywhere. Now when I boot up Windows and I'm physically connected to the network with the Samba server, the Event Viewer says that the Workstation service could not be started because "JMM is not a valid computer name" (JMM is my Windows computer). Then there are a whole bunch of other networking errors due to other services that depend on Workstation. Then I get "The Workstation service terminated with the following error: A duplicate name exists on the network." A...

...that understands as categorical, and when you try to predict it is encountering some different categories and it doesn't know what to do with them. As that variable is most probably numeric, it should be read as such. You can try converting it on both your train and test datasets. Cheers, JMM. -- Jos? Mar?a Mateos https://rinzewind.org/blog-es || https://rinzewind.org/blog-en

On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 03:10 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > (copying debian-kernel for reasons which will hopefully become obvious) > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:10:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= <jmm at inutil.org> wrote: > > In current Debian kernel there's no special Xen dom0 kernel image and depending > > on irqbalance in the kernel package would be overkill. > > Would it? I thought irqbalance is actually required even for native with > modern kernels, since the...

...<Jeremy@Malcolm.ml.org> > To: "'Christian Barth'" <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>, "'Afan Ottenheimer'" <afan@www.jeonet.com>, <samba@samba.org> > Subject: RE: Three problems with Windows NT > Message-ID: <000001be35e0$ef388e00$658f19cb@jmm.proctors.com.au> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Thanks for your advice on this issue - my main problem was that I had > been using a command like: > > smbmount //jmm/cd /mnt/jmm_cdrom/ -I 203.25.143.101 -c wotan -P > topsecret > > thinking that smbmount...

Hola and thanks for any help in advance I installed mandrake 9 a few days ago and wanted to set up some additional rules to shorewall, bu i failed :) What i want to do is basicly route any incomming udp and tcp packets on port 4665 to a workstation behind the router. router with mandrake 9, eth0 (192.168.0.1) internal net, eth1(10.0.0.0) connected to dsl modem and gets a dynamic ip

I've implemented this by adding calls to GC_add_roots(<first global in module>,<last global in module>+1) to the llvm.global_ctors before any other static initialization code for the module. This should be safe assuming that: - global variables are laid out in memory in the order they appear in their module (and ideally contiguously without being interleaved with any other values)