Displaying 20 results from an estimated 33 matches for "jlerouge".
Did you mean:
lerouge
2008 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] More llvm-gcc build breakage
...failed on rev 54197, when building the x86->ppc
cross:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/Users/julien/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/src/gcc/cp/pt.c:5296: warning: no
previous prototype for 'outermost_tinst_level'
make[2]: *** [cp/pt.o] Error 1
MingW failed on rev 54208:
/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/./gcc/
-L/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/i686-pc-mingw32/winsup/mingw
-L/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/i686-pc-mingw32/winsup/w32api/lib
-isystem
/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/ll...
2008 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] More llvm-gcc build breakage
...buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/src/gcc/cp/pt.c:5296: warning:
> no
> previous prototype for 'outermost_tinst_level'
> make[2]: *** [cp/pt.o] Error 1
>
I think this was a temporary situation. I can't find it in TOT anymore.
> MingW failed on rev 54208:
>
> /c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/./gcc/
> -L/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/i686-pc-mingw32/
> winsup/mingw
> -L/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/gcc-build/i686-pc-mingw32/
> winsup/w32api/lib
> -isystem
&...
2008 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] More llvm-gcc build breakage
Hi Bill,
This is probably due to the llvm-gcc merge. Please take a look.
Thanks,
Evan
On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> x86-64 linux, during stage3:
>
> xgcc -B/home/duncan/LLVM/gcc-4.2.llvm-objects/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/
> gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/gnat-llvm/
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-
2009 Jan 27
3
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] llvm/llvm-gcc broken on mingw32
...2.5 is near, I have been trying to build llvm and llvm-gcc for MingW, but
hit several problem (using the current trunk).
First issue is that unittests don't build for MingW, the attached patch
should fix it.
Second issue is that llvm-gcc fails for me with the following error:
/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm-test/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm-test/gcc-build/./gcc/ -L/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm-test/gcc-build/i686-pc-mingw32/winsup/mingw -L/c/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm-test/gcc-build/i686-pc-mingw32/winsup/w32api/lib -isystem /c/cygwin/home/...
2008 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] More llvm-gcc build breakage
x86-64 linux, during stage3:
xgcc -B/home/duncan/LLVM/gcc-4.2.llvm-objects/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/local/gnat-llvm/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gcc-4.2.llvm/libgomp -I.
2009 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-GCC & GV zeroinitializers, 2.5 vs 2.6.
Hello Julien,
I think the reason for the change was because there is processor context information stored in the type in 2.6. The reason it's there is to support multicore JIT architecture.
--Sam
----- Original Message ----
> From: Julien Lerouge <jlerouge at apple.com>
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 7:55:37 PM
> Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM-GCC & GV zeroinitializers, 2.5 vs 2.6.
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I have a small piece of C code written like this:
>...
2008 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] More llvm-gcc build breakage
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:32:18AM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Julien Lerouge wrote:
>> ../../../llvm-gcc4.2-src/gcc/libgcc2.c:2095: error: conflicting types
>> for 'VirtualProtect'
>>
>> c:/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/lib/../include/winbase.h:1998:
>> error: previous declaration of 'VirtualProtect' was here
>>
> This is weird. Why is it #including this header during the bootstrap?
Not sure, I'll take a look. This is not a real bootstrap anyway.
Thanks,
Julien
--
Julie...
2009 Sep 11
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM-GCC & GV zeroinitializers, 2.5 vs 2.6.
Hello folks,
I have a small piece of C code written like this:
typedef struct {
char a;
int b;
int c;
} foo;
foo myFoo[5] = {{0}};
With llvm-gcc 2.5, I get the following IR:
%struct.foo = type { i8, i32, i32 }
@myFoo = global [5 x %struct.foo] zeroinitializer, align 32
With the current 2.6, I get this:
%0 = type { i8, [11 x i8] }
2008 Aug 12
0
[LLVMdev] More llvm-gcc build breakage
...> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:32:18AM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> > On Jul 30, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Julien Lerouge wrote:
> >> ../../../llvm-gcc4.2-src/gcc/libgcc2.c:2095: error: conflicting types
> >> for 'VirtualProtect'
> >>
> >> c:/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm/lib/../include/winbase.h:1998:
> >> error: previous declaration of 'VirtualProtect' was here
> >>
> > This is weird. Why is it #including this header during the bootstrap?
>
> Not sure, I'll take a look. This is not a real bootstrap anyway.
&...
2009 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] Pre pr4572 lvm-gcc building/working revision needed
Hi,
I am trying to find someone who has a building/working pre pr4572 revision
of llvm-gcc working on Cygwin and/or MinGW32.
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090805/bbbfe6df/attachment.html>
2009 Aug 06
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Pre pr4572 lvm-gcc building/working revision needed
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 01:35:20PM +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find someone who has a building/working pre pr4572 revision
> of llvm-gcc working on Cygwin and/or MinGW32.
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Aaron
Hello,
The last revision I had working on MingW is 74998.
I know that 75131 and later are broken, not sure what the status was
between
2011 Sep 22
0
[LLVMdev] new annotations in IR?
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:46:05AM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:
> With recent work a plugin can now Annotate a VarDecl at the AST level, how
> can this be used in a Pass at the IR level? What classes are responsible for
> their manipulation? I assumed it would be part of Value, or something common
> like it, but I do not see any mentions of Annotation or Attribute.
>
> Thank you
2011 Sep 22
1
[LLVMdev] new annotations in IR?
How can they processed? I cant seem to find any solid information about how
they exist in IR form from a Passes perspective. I see things like
@llvm.var.annotation in dumps but no relevant sounding methods to get at
these.
Thank you
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Julien Lerouge <jlerouge at apple.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:46:05AM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:
> > With recent work a plugin can now Annotate a VarDecl at the AST level,
> how
> > can this be used in a Pass at the IR level? What classes are responsible
> for
> > their manipulatio...
2011 Sep 22
4
[LLVMdev] new annotations in IR?
With recent work a plugin can now Annotate a VarDecl at the AST level, how
can this be used in a Pass at the IR level? What classes are responsible for
their manipulation? I assumed it would be part of Value, or something common
like it, but I do not see any mentions of Annotation or Attribute.
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2009 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] mingw build problems
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:13:55AM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> > Anyway, I'd vote for removing all references to __eprintf from
> > lib/System/Win32/DynamicLibrary.inc.
> Agree. Julien, what do you think?
That's fine with me. I'll test it once the change is made.
Thanks,
Julien
--
Julien Lerouge
PGP Key Id: 0xB1964A62
PGP Fingerprint: 392D 4BAD DB8B CE7F 4E5F
2011 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] RFC/Heads Up: Deprecating External Build Support
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:24:13PM -0700, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> Object now, or hold your peace.
We use it as well for an internal project. Not maintaining a build
system is really a nice feature that got us up to speed very quickly. We
have been using it for the past 4 years, and it's been proven reliable.
We will eventually switch to CMake, but if we can keep it around as long
as
2007 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] May 25th 2007 Developers Meeting (Update)
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 03:11:44PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote:
> If you haven't confirmed your attendance yet, please do so by
> responding to this email.
Hello,
I would like to attend too.
Thank you,
Julien
--
Julien Lerouge
PGP Key Id: 0xB1964A62
PGP Fingerprint: 392D 4BAD DB8B CE7F 4E5F FA3C 62DB 4AA7 B196 4A62
PGP Public Key from: keyserver.pgp.com
2008 Mar 12
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Get dlerror() messages
Hello,
Attached is a simple fix for getting error messages from dlerror in
LoadLibraryPermanently. The current code modifies the value of a pointer
that is passed by value, so the caller never gets the message.
Hope this helps,
Julien
--
Julien Lerouge
PGP Key Id: 0xB1964A62
PGP Fingerprint: 392D 4BAD DB8B CE7F 4E5F FA3C 62DB 4AA7 B196 4A62
PGP Public Key from: keyserver.pgp.com
--------------
2008 Mar 21
0
[LLVMdev] Apple's GCC and .s/.S files in llvm-test
Hello,
Apple's GCC does not make the distinction between .s and .S files and
always run the preprocessor. From the man:
| file.s
| Assembler code. Apple's version of GCC runs the preprocessor on these
| files as well as those ending in .S.
|
| file.S
| Assembler code which must be preprocessed.
The problem is that sometimes llc generates comments in the assembly
that
2008 Apr 01
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Running SPEC benchmark with objdir != srcdir
Hello,
I would like to run a SPEC benchmark from llvm-test, with objdir !=
srcdir. Right now it doesn't work because the config file
External/SPEC/Makefile.spec.config is not created by the configure
script in the target objdir.
The attached patch adds the above Makefile to the list of Makefile(s)
configure has to process. I have tested it on my local tree (needs to
regenerate configure).