search for: jjww

I have a question about the lme function in R. My question is: After I got the object from function lme, why the numIter value of the object is always NULL? Following is my code: jjww<-lme(y~x*zz,data=simul,random=~x|group, control=lmeControl(returnObject=TRUE)) attributes(jjww) jjww$numIter the first 20 observation of data simul are: > simul y x zz group 1 1.20722846 0.173024384 0.13729258 1 2 1.44...

This may not be the answer you''re looking for, but I don''t know if it''s something you''ve thought of. If you''re pulling a LUN from an expensive array, with multiple HBA''s in the system, why not run mpxio? If you ARE running mpxio, there shouldn''t be an issue with a path dropping. I have the setup above in my test lab and pull cables

Hi, I have a question about the lme function in R. My question is: After I got the object from function lme, why the numIter value of the object is always NULL? Following is my code: jjww<-lme(y~x*zz,data=simul,random=~x|group, control=lmeControl(returnObject=TRUE)) attributes(jjww) jjww$numIter the first 20 observation of data simul are: > simul y x zz group 1 1.20722846 0.173024384 0.13729258 1 2 1.44...

...biggest chunk. Also, when the backup is suspended the memory is not freed. Eventually, the server hung and rebooted (perhaps due to Oracle cluster-health mechanism - I won''t blame ZFS for that ;-). I suspect a ZFS caching issue. I was directed to this doc (http:// blogs.digitar.com/jjww/?itemid=44) . It sort of addresses the issue we have encountered but I''d rather get the news from you guys. How shall I proceed? I have a system I can use and abuse in preproduction for this purpose. We need to load a Terabyte into a production ZFS filesystem without pulling down ev...

...better.. So >> im nervous about doing this with only one volume in the zfs pool. > > 13 disk RAID-5 will suck. Try to stick with fewer devices in the set. > > See also > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-December/024194.html > http://blogs.digitar.com/jjww/?itemid=44 > I cant find a santricity download that will work with a 6130, but that''s ok.. I just created 14 volumes per shelf :) hardware raid is so yesterday. > That data is somewhat dated, as we now have the ability to put the ZIL > on a different log device (Nevada b70 or...

Is it true that Solaris 10 u4 does not have any of the nice ZIL controls that exist in the various recent Open Solaris flavors? I would like to move my ZIL to solid state storage, but I fear I can''t do it until I have another update. Heck, I would be happy to just be able to turn the ZIL off to see how my NFS on ZFS performance is effected before spending the $''s. Anyone