search for: jitevaluatedsymbol

...y code is trying to get the compiled function's address using something like this: return ES->lookup({MainJD}, (*Mangle)(Name.str())); Here is the call stack: libravi.dll!llvm::orc::MaterializationResponsibility::notifyResolved(const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr,llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol,llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr>,llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr,llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol>> & Symbols) Line 449 C++ libravi.dll!llvm::orc::RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer::onObjLoad(unsigned __int64 K, llvm::orc::MaterializationResponsibility...

...brarySearchGenerator::GetForCurrentProcess( DL->getGlobalPrefix()))); auto &JD = *MainJD; llvm::orc::MangleAndInterner mangle(*ES, *this->DL); llvm::orc::SymbolMap Symbols; for (int i = 0; global_syms[i].name != nullptr; i++) { Symbols.insert({mangle(global_syms[i].name), llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol(llvm::pointerToJITTargetAddress(global_syms[i].address), llvm::JITSymbolFlags(llvm::JITSymbolFlags::FlagNames::Absolute))}); } llvm::cantFail(JD.define(llvm::orc::absoluteSymbols(Symbols)), "Failed to install extern symbols"); FYI - my previous post on similar issue. Basically I haven...

...GlobalPrefix()))); >> auto &JD = *MainJD; >> llvm::orc::MangleAndInterner mangle(*ES, *this->DL); >> llvm::orc::SymbolMap Symbols; >> for (int i = 0; global_syms[i].name != nullptr; i++) { >> Symbols.insert({mangle(global_syms[i].name), >> >> llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol(llvm::pointerToJITTargetAddress(global_syms[i].address), >> >> llvm::JITSymbolFlags(llvm::JITSymbolFlags::FlagNames::Absolute))}); >> } >> llvm::cantFail(JD.define(llvm::orc::absoluteSymbols(Symbols)), "Failed >> to install extern symbols"); >> >>...

Hi all, I am using LLVM for JIT use-case and compile functions on the fly. I want to "free" the modules after some time and reclaim any memory associated with it. I am using the SimpleORC API <https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/BuildingAJIT1.html> now. Is there an API to "free" all the memory associated with the module? I use one "compiler" instance (think similar

...::JITDylibLookupFlags>, std::__1::allocator<std::__1::pair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::orc::JITDylibLookupFlags> > > const&, llvm::orc::SymbolLookupSet, llvm::orc::SymbolState, llvm::unique_function<void (llvm::Expected<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol> > >)>, std::__1::function<void (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm:...

Hi All, Everything is landing all at once, just not in the mainline... yet. As discussed in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-September/144885.html: OrcV1 will be removed very soon. I have posted a branch with the removal, "orcv1-removal", in my llvm fork at https://github.com/lhames/llvm-project. In addition to removing OrcV1, the orcv1-removal branch also contains a

...lib*, >>>>> llvm::orc::JITDylibLookupFlags> > > const&, llvm::orc::SymbolLookupSet, >>>>> llvm::orc::SymbolState, llvm::unique_function<void >>>>> (llvm::Expected<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, >>>>> llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr>, >>>>> llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, >>>>> llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol> > >)>, std::__1::function<void >>>>> (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, >>&g...

..., > std::__1::allocator<std::__1::pair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, > llvm::orc::JITDylibLookupFlags> > > const&, llvm::orc::SymbolLookupSet, > llvm::orc::SymbolState, llvm::unique_function<void > (llvm::Expected<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, > llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr>, > llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, > llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol> > >)>, std::__1::function<void > (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, > llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, > ll...

Hi Lang, On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 23:26, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: >> I also get this message: >> JIT session error: Symbols not found: { raise_error } > > > Ahh -- I see the problem. The DynamicLibrarySearchGenerator is using the getAddressOfSymbol method, which (under the hood) is basically issuing an appropriate dlsym lookup, and that does not find

...NewSymbols; for(const auto &name : LookupSet) { printf("Generate!\n"); const uintptr_t adr = UndefinedReferenceResolver::lookup((*name.first).data()); if(adr) { NewSymbols[name.first] = llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol(adr, llvm::JITSymbolFlags::Absolute); } else { notFound.push_back(name.first); } } JD.define(absoluteSymbols(std::move(NewSymbols))); return (notFound.size() == 0) ? llvm::Error::success() : llvm::make_er...

...;> llvm::orc::MangleAndInterner mangle(*ES, *this->DL); > > >> llvm::orc::SymbolMap Symbols; > > >> for (int i = 0; global_syms[i].name != nullptr; i++) { > > >> Symbols.insert({mangle(global_syms[i].name), > > >> > > >> > llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol(llvm::pointerToJITTargetAddress(global_syms[i].address), > > >> > > >> llvm::JITSymbolFlags(llvm::JITSymbolFlags::FlagNames::Absolute))}); > > >> } > > >> llvm::cantFail(JD.define(llvm::orc::absoluteSymbols(Symbols)), "Failed > > >> t...

Hi all, I am following the LLVM JIT tutorial API based on: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/BuildingAJIT1.html I have 2 independent questions: 1. The tutorial mentions that "*will defer compilation of the module until any of its definitions is looked up*". Does that mean to force eager compilation, i have to keep track of all functions added to the Module and do a lookup? I want the

...NewSymbols; for(const auto &name : LookupSet) { printf("Generate!\n"); const uintptr_t adr = UndefinedReferenceResolver::lookup((*name.first).data()); if(adr) { NewSymbols[name.first] = llvm::JITEvaluatedSymbol(adr, llvm::JITSymbolFlags::Absolute); } else { notFound.push_back(name.first); } } JD.define(absoluteSymbols(std::move(NewSymbols))); return (notFound.size() == 0) ? llvm::Error::success() : llvm::make_er...

...TestSym = ES.lookup({&PlanschiJD}, ES.intern("test")), SymbolState::Resolved) { // Tell the JIT that the address of PlanschiTest is the same // as the address of "test" in the Planschi JITDylib. MR.notifyResolved({ { ES.intern("Planschi_test"), JITEvaluatedSymbol(TestSym.getAddress(), JITSymbolFlags::Exported) } }); // Tell the JIT that "Planschi_test" depends on the "test" symbol in // the Planschi JITDylib: MR.addDependencies(ES.intern("Planschi_test"), {{&PlanschJD...

Hey Lang, > Do you mean that the object file is produced by another process and is being loaded into your JIT process for execution, or that you want your JIT to produce code for several different processes? These are different problems with different solutions. I'll wait until I understand your use case to answer further. In the current state we don’t have a JIT only an handcrafted object