search for: jitc

On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 18:17 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote: > I guess this is slightly offtopic, but the post about the JIT and garbage > collection made me wonder why LLVM supports JIT compilation at all. It has > much smaller scope for optimisation due to the speed requirements, takes > more memory and causes the same work to be repeated over and over for each > execution. > >

On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:56:48 -0500, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > Granted, LLVM currently doesn't really do much of this, but the > infastructure is there to do so. Right, but you can get this by doing profile directed optimisation during development so end users/production systems don't have the overhead. Also it seems to me that at some point the bookkeeping and analysis overhead for

I guess this is slightly offtopic, but the post about the JIT and garbage collection made me wonder why LLVM supports JIT compilation at all. It has much smaller scope for optimisation due to the speed requirements, takes more memory and causes the same work to be repeated over and over for each execution. What reason is there for anything to use JIT compilation over ahead-of-time compiling to

On Tuesday 13 May 2008 06:49:34 kr512 wrote: > Jon Harrop wrote: > > Can you explain why you would like to generate DLLs on the > > customer's computer rather than using LLVM as a JIT > > compiler? > > Customers/clients unhappy with the inefficiency, extra CPU > and RAM usage, and performance penalty of JIT. They require > a faster, more efficient solution.

...gt; > > More relevant information below... > > I'd be grateful for any ideas or advice on this. I desperately need to > retrieve vulnerability reports, patches, and other DoD resources. > Thanks! > > Cal Webster > I have a G&D FIPS 201 SCE 3.2 test CAC from JITC I can attach to VM for debbuging. > > > > Smart Card Reader: > SCM Microsystems Inc. SCR3310 USB Smart Card Reader > (21120628202509) 00 > 00-0 > > Old CAC: GEMAL TO TOPDL GX4 144 > New CAC: G&D FIPS 201 SCE 3.2 > > > [root at inet3 ~]# cat /etc/re...

Can anyone help with getting the new DoD CACs (Smart Card) to work in CentOS 6.6? I don't use it for console logins, only for email and .mil web sites. I recently had to get a new DoD CAC (Smart Card) when one of the buildings I work in upgraded their security system. My old CAC was working fine prior to this for signing and encrypting email and for authenticating to various DoD (.mil) sites

Jon Harrop wrote: > Can you explain why you would like to generate DLLs on the > customer's computer rather than using LLVM as a JIT > compiler? Customers/clients unhappy with the inefficiency, extra CPU and RAM usage, and performance penalty of JIT. They require a faster, more efficient solution. The solution is to fully compile programs to native code at the time of

...<mail@fwr.on.ca> Subject: Samba and smbfs do not report all files in a directory X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.21; build=646 X-Mailer-Platform: Linux; architecture=x86; version=2.4.9muy00 X-Mailer-Java-VM: IBM Corporation; version=J2RE 1.3.0 IBM build cx130-20010626 (JIT enabled: jitc); compiler=jitc Message-ID: <200109121147.000000CY@TYAN586> Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help> List-Post: &...