search for: jit_lib

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "jit_lib".

Did you mean: jit_libs
2006 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] Adding register allocator to LLVM
On 9/2/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > Make sure to add it to Codegen/LinkAllCodegenComponents.h. I'm sure I did. I did so from the first time and I also needed to add my library .a file to the USEDLIBS variable within llc makefile to build llc. I wonder how lli links with all the rest LLVM as it seems to include no lib within its makefile. May be I need to
2006 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] Adding register allocator to LLVM
...my > library .a file to the USEDLIBS variable within llc makefile to build llc. > I wonder how lli links with all the rest LLVM as it seems to include no lib > within its makefile. May be I need to include/link my lib somewhere else? Ah, that's probably it. Try adding your lib to the JIT_LIBS variable in llvm/Makefile.rules. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
2005 May 19
3
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm 'make install' build errors
Reid, I think it is the first time it is run that the errors occcur !? Not sure but that would seem logical. Aaron
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
...as/ld). The Makefiles for gccas/gccld/lli list the libraries they use in the USEDLIBS variable. Additionally, lli uses the special meta-library "JIT" which expands to include the generic JIT libraries and the target backend(s) that you have selected. See llvm/Makefile.rules, search for JIT_LIBS and read from there. You want to take the union of these sets, and that would do it. > Yes, I just tried with cvs and It still compiles all back-ends. I'll > try it again to make sure, and then report the bug. Instead of opening a new bug, please reopen this one: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.e...
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote: > Maybe we can use you for a testimonial... :) Certainly. > > Tail Call Elimination: > > > > I've read over the "Random llvm notes", and see that you guys have > > though about this already. > > > > However, the note dates from last year, so I am wondering if there is > > an implementation in the works.