Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "jit_lib".
Did you mean:
jit_libs
2006 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] Adding register allocator to LLVM
On 9/2/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
>
> Make sure to add it to Codegen/LinkAllCodegenComponents.h.
I'm sure I did. I did so from the first time and I also needed to add my
library .a file to the USEDLIBS variable within llc makefile to build llc.
I wonder how lli links with all the rest LLVM as it seems to include no lib
within its makefile. May be I need to
2006 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] Adding register allocator to LLVM
...my
> library .a file to the USEDLIBS variable within llc makefile to build llc.
> I wonder how lli links with all the rest LLVM as it seems to include no lib
> within its makefile. May be I need to include/link my lib somewhere else?
Ah, that's probably it. Try adding your lib to the JIT_LIBS variable in
llvm/Makefile.rules.
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/
2005 May 19
3
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm 'make install' build errors
Reid,
I think it is the first time it is run that the errors occcur !?
Not sure but that would seem logical.
Aaron
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
...as/ld).
The Makefiles for gccas/gccld/lli list the libraries they use in the
USEDLIBS variable. Additionally, lli uses the special meta-library
"JIT" which expands to include the generic JIT libraries and the target
backend(s) that you have selected. See llvm/Makefile.rules, search for
JIT_LIBS and read from there.
You want to take the union of these sets, and that would do it.
> Yes, I just tried with cvs and It still compiles all back-ends. I'll
> try it again to make sure, and then report the bug.
Instead of opening a new bug, please reopen this one:
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.e...
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote:
> Maybe we can use you for a testimonial... :)
Certainly.
> > Tail Call Elimination:
> >
> > I've read over the "Random llvm notes", and see that you guys have
> > though about this already.
> >
> > However, the note dates from last year, so I am wondering if there is
> > an implementation in the works.