search for: jiggery

I read this list often, and although I'm not smart enough to contribute, I learn a lot every day. But I read a post from this morning that contained this: >a fair amount of jiggery-pokery Just wondering...is this a technical term? Where is it documented? I won't offer any insight into what vision it gave me. ;-) Thanks for all the work on the distribution and all the invaluable info posted here. -Ben

Aaaaaa, I'm pulling out my hair over here! I have an external USB drive which I had at work, connected just fine to my CentOS 5.3 box. I recall there was some jiggery-pokery involved, but do not recall just what. So now I'm on my wife's freshly installed CentOS 5.3 laptop trying to get it going, and I keep getting errors about FATAL: Module fuse not found. I saw this message from the May archives : http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2009-May/0...

I just picked up Camping and I''m currently reviewing every little tidbit of information I can find out about it. I really liked the simplicity of RubyOnRails, but sometimes you want something fast and everything is relative. After looking at Camping, RubyOnRails seems like a lot of work if you just want to test out a prototype of a small web app. One thing I do miss are all the

.... As a replacement for the POTS-style shared line, I have implemented a "barge in" feature; any internal extension is able to join the call of any other internal extension by dialing the extension number followed by *. Behind the scenes, I'm using ChannelRedirect and some additional jiggery pokery to pull everyone into a ConfBridge conference. In the vast majority of cases, I'll end up with 2 internal extensions bridged to an external call. But when the 2 internal extensions hang up, there's nothing to prevent the external party from accidentally staying connected to the bri...

Why does Ruby-1.9.2-p0 require an additional ../ for relative paths when compared to the same code for ruby1.8? if RUBY_VERSION < ''1.9'' require File.dirname(__FILE__) + library else require_relative File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/..'' + library end -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core"

Hi, I have a class to add users to all the host servers. We are in the process to have a coexisting user which belongs in NIS & as well as /etc/passwd. We have NIS clients (yp running) on all host servers. So when running puppet is fails to add or modify user, bcos the user already exists in NIS. Eg: A user pcruise is an existing NIS user. When using useradd or

...vices. We then configured a single ZFS pool on top of this, using two raid-z arrays. We are getting some OK numbers this way, but it seems a waste of the resources on the 3510 if we are handing everything back to the OS to handle, although I recall reading somewhere that letting ZFS handle all this jiggery-pokery was the best way to do things. I guess our question is, being new to ZFS in general and looking to optimise the kind of numbers we are getting out in terms of performance, as well as configuring a setup that will survive a disk failure, is this a sensible way of configuring a 3510 for maxim...

I''d like to see if we can use DTrace to as the kernel implementation of the BSD systrace security policy system (http://www.systrace.org). I don''t really want to port systrace to Solaris because I think with DTrace we already have all the necessary in kernel hooks to do this. With systrace you express things like: "httpd can bind to port 80 but not any other port, it