search for: jibes

...29.html * http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/solaris-opensolaris-20/powerdns-vs-bind- 636478/ (same dilemma as mine) In particular do you have any complaints about doing complicated setups? Windows machines registering themselves? Upstream provider's continued support after 5.x? Any other jibes or cheers? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 2...

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: > Maybe it can follow the "Delete dead loops" pass which is after > Induction Variable Simplification pass, so it will not affect existing > exitvalue rewriting optimization in Induction Variable Simplification > to find out and delete dead loops? > > Existing pass pipeline: >

I am using rsync to sync filesystems from one Solaris machine to another at a remote site. Everything sync's fine, except for the ownership preservation. The permissions all get transferred correctly and so do all the files, but the ownership always gets changed to whomever I perform the sync as. I tried this as root and still the same problem. I am using the -p, -o and -g options to preserve

Specifically, the instructions on the Samba3 doc file explain that I must edit the following information (as did John): Make an entry in /etc/services for a line called "swat". I've done that, it's called "swat3", and it ports to 902/TCP (Yes, I realize it's not the native port.) Make the adjustment in the /etc/xinet[d].d/swat3 file to point to the same port.

Howdy, How do I change the hostname? In particular, what is the difference between /etc/hosts and /etc/sysconfig/network files? Where should I make the changes? Thanks, CS. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090615/fb9e463a/attachment-0001.html>

In the effort to flesh out the CMake build system a problematic issue has come up, and I’d like some feedback on how to best handle it. For reference this issue has been reported by a few users, one proposed patches that don’t really address the underlying problem here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13131 The problem comes when bootstrapping a cross-compiler toolchain. In order to have a

Hi all. Everything has been running great, untill 2 weeks ago when I applied redhat errata including a new kernel. (done it loads of times before) Rebooted and all seemed ok (it was half term for me, so maybe 20 users in at the very most) It wasn't until last week people started to complain about how long it was taking to log in. unfortunatly everytime I tried it went in straight away. The

...repository and have the built-ins be able to build as a sub-project. I think we can make it work such that compiler-rt can be built either from the top-level directory to build it all, or from the built-ins sub directory to support bootstrapping cross-compilers. > > I'm not sure if this jibes with your statement, but IMHO, the > refactored built-ins should move into the LLVM repo. In this spirit, > I believe gcc includes libgcc in-tree. Being both a small library and > intimately tied to LLVM, the complexity of a new separate built-ins > repo is a little dubious. The sani...

I''m just uploading all my data to my server and the space used is much more than what i''m uploading; Documents = 147MB Videos = 11G Software= 1.4G By my calculations, that equals 12.547T, yet zpool list is showing 21G as being allocated; NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT dpool 27.2T 21.2G 27.2T 0% 1.00x ONLINE - It doesn''t look like

Hello, Currently I'm moving over to linux. I got fedora core 7, and I've been running it on a virtual machine. There is one piece of software I can't live without. It's called writeitnow: http://www.ravensheadservices.com/ Wine is installed on my box. When I run the application I get the following error message: "The Java(TM) VM could not be started. Please restart the

Hi Folks, Let's keep this optimization alive. To summarize: several folks voiced general support, but with questions about why existing optimizations do not already catch this case. Deep dive by Wei Mi showed that the optimization is most likely not a clean-up of LSR sloppiness, but something new. Follow-up by myself confirmed that the redundancy eliminated the LoopExitValues pass exists in

Ok, so I think I have a complete explanation for the difference between the *BSD behaviour and the Linux/Solaris behaviour. Well, almost complete :) Pull out your trusty copies of "The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating System" as well as "Unix Internals: The New Frontiers". Specifically, pages 111-112 and 344 of the former and page 108 of the latter. It comes

HI, T5220, S10U4 + patches mdb -k > ::memstat While above is working (takes some time, ideally ::memstat -n 4 to use 4 threads could be useful) mpstat 1 shows: CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys wt idl 48 0 0 1922112 9 0 0 8 0 0 0 15254 6 94 0 0 So about 2mln xcalls per second. Let''s check with dtrace:

Hi, Whenever i am using the command rsync --write-batch -av --stats `cat $1` -e ssh user@remote machine:/destination/ This is writing rsync_argvs files in the home directory as well as to the destination directory. Can anyone give me any idea as how to prevent the writing of rsync_argvs files in the home directory which is of no use. Regards, Surabhi. > ---------- > From:

Hey, I''m working on a project, and mongrel may be part of the stack, but I''ve got some more general questions and ideas I''m hoping to run by this list. The people on this list have a broader knowledgebase and more experience than any place else I know - plus a general friendliness and willingness to help! I''m working with a company who has a really antique