search for: jhugh

...3/lib/action_controller/integration.rb:519:in `open_session'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.13.3/lib/action_controller/integration.rb:490:in `reset!'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.13.3/lib/action_controller/integration.rb:546:in `method_missing'' /home/jhughes/dev/rj/csite/config/../vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/matchers.rb:146:in `method_missing'' stories/use_case_story.rb:38:in `a logged-in user'' /home/jhughes/dev/rj/csite/config/../vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/story/simple_step.rb:13:in `__send__'' /home/jhughes/dev/rj/csit...

...t it falls down at the "require ''rubygems''" line in boot.rb. I have added the path to rubygems to LOAD_PATH in environment.rb; this is confirmed by dumping $: to a logfile right before the call to require: W, [2006-05-30T11:10:03.040915 #13641] WARN -- : ["/home/jhughes/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8", "/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8", "/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i686-linux", "/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby", "/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8", "/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux", "."] The contents of th...

...something is wrong with my story code; for instance, I got it when I referenced a variable in my ''Given'' that I had forgotten to pass into the block. Now I''m getting it when I attempt to post to a login action: And ''user is logged in as'', ''jhughes'' do |login| post ''/login'', :login => login, :password => ''secret'' end #post calls reset!, leading to the errors on the top of the stack below. This is still happening after updating to the latest rspec trunk about 5 minutes ago. Rails...

...ck_model(FaCode) FaCode.stub!(:find).and_return([@fa_code]) end generates this failure: NameError in ''FaCodesController handling GET /fa_codes should assign the found fa_codes for the view'' uninitialized constant Spec::Rails::Initializer (eval):11:in `class'' /home/jhughes/dev/rj/gump_rewrite/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/rails/dsl/behaviour/rails_example.rb:85:in `add_stubs'' /home/jhughes/dev/rj/gump_rewrite/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/rails/dsl/behaviour/rails_example.rb:73:in `mock_model'' ./spec/controllers/fa_codes_controll...

I have read the info on apache 2.4... I added to the bottom of httpd.conf these lines (and restarted httpd) ------------------------- <Directory /var/www/html> # old 2.2 config # Order Allow,Deny # Allow from all AllowOverride None Require all granted </Directory> <Directory /home/silentm/public_html/gifs> AllowOverride None Require all granted </Directory>

...i386.rpm Source: ac62180672f1c1e4c927786542c8c6c7 gfs2-utils-0.1.44-1.el5_2.1.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:46:35 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <jhughes at hughesjr.com> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0584 Important CentOS 4 i386 pidgin - security update To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce at centos.org> Message-ID: <4879EB1B.7000703 at centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" CentOS Errata and...

...thm 8" Defining it in the .rpmmacros would be best .. I think otherwise you would need to define it in youe rpmbild line AND your rpm signature line. Are you building your rpms in mock or from rpmbuild on the command line? If I do this on my default c7 install, I get that as the default: [jhughes at localhost ~]$ rpmbuild --showrc | grep filedigest_algorithm -14: _binary_filedigest_algorithm 8 -14: _source_filedigest_algorithm 8 Not sure how you got it to do it in SHA1 :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: applicati...

Hi, I''ve been using backgroundrb with some success up to now, but now when I do the start or setup tasks they just fail silently. Nothing in the log, no .pid file, and nothing in the process list. Rake with -trace just says, ** Invoke backgroundrb:setup (first_time) ** Execute backgroundrb:setup Any hints on how I can get more verbosity, or thoughts on what might be happening? (This

...I think otherwise you >> would need to define it in youe rpmbild line AND your rpm signature line. >> >> Are you building your rpms in mock or from rpmbuild on the command line? >> >> If I do this on my default c7 install, I get that as the default: >> >> [jhughes at localhost ~]$ rpmbuild --showrc | grep filedigest_algorithm >> -14: _binary_filedigest_algorithm 8 >> -14: _source_filedigest_algorithm 8 >> >> Not sure how you got it to do it in SHA1 :) > > One last thought .. are you using something like: > > --force-v3...

...pmmacros would be best .. I think otherwise you > would need to define it in youe rpmbild line AND your rpm signature line. > > Are you building your rpms in mock or from rpmbuild on the command line? > > If I do this on my default c7 install, I get that as the default: > > [jhughes at localhost ~]$ rpmbuild --showrc | grep filedigest_algorithm > -14: _binary_filedigest_algorithm 8 > -14: _source_filedigest_algorithm 8 > > Not sure how you got it to do it in SHA1 :) One last thought .. are you using something like: --force-v3-sigs in your signing command line...

Hi, I have this setup block: setup do session[:login] = ''jhughes'' @user = mock("user") User.stub!(:find).and_return(@user) @params = {:cn => "Bilbo Baggins", :telephoneNumber => "416-277-4418", :mail => "bilbo at baggins.com"} end And then this spec: specify "should up...

On 24 Jul 2015, at 15:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > Also, what does this command output: > > uname -r > > > Should be something like this: > > > [jhughes at T520 ~]$ uname -r > 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64 Yes, it?s exactly the same here for my kernel version. Kind Regards, Keith

I yum updated last Saturday. It had a new kernel. I hadn't rebooted but saw that firefox update today and did that then rebooted. My system wouldn't boot all the way ?with the new kernel. I went back to 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64 and my system would boot. When I boot with the 3.10.0-229.11.x kernel. I noticed some gnome manager stuff. I thought I had the kde desktop installed for

Hi, Page 183 of Programming Ruby, talking about the $: load path variable, states: "You can always add additional directories to this array from within your running program". So why can''t I do this in environment.rb: $:.concat(Dir["/home/jhughes/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8"]) # path points at my install of rubygems and then have require ''rubygems'' work in boot.rb? Here''s the error log (just trying to get CGI working right now): [Mon May 29 14:12:32 2006] [error] [client 192.168.0.112] /projects/active...

Hi: spec <files> works though. Stack trace: rake spec (in /home/jhughes/work/media-catalog/trunk) /usr/bin/ruby1.8 -Ilib /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-0.6.1/bin/spec "spec/models/category_spec.rb" "spec/models/item_spec.rb" /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-0.6.1/lib/spec.rb:1:in `require'': no such file to load -- spec/version (LoadEr...

...gt;> would need to define it in youe rpmbild line AND your rpm signature line. >>> >>> Are you building your rpms in mock or from rpmbuild on the command line? >>> >>> If I do this on my default c7 install, I get that as the default: >>> >>> [jhughes at localhost ~]$ rpmbuild --showrc | grep filedigest_algorithm >>> -14: _binary_filedigest_algorithm 8 >>> -14: _source_filedigest_algorithm 8 >>> >>> Not sure how you got it to do it in SHA1 :) >> >> One last thought .. are you using something like...

Hi all, Which will be next stable release for CentOS 5.2?? Can i use on a production enviromment?? Thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

How to inst that Network manager please ================ Worthy agent of Light ================ Jules Irenge MSc Student University of Liverpool

Thanks Nux for your reply. I have tried doing the search and all these packages are installed: ======================================= N/S matched: kvm ======================================= libvirt-daemon-kvm.x86_64 : Server side daemon & driver required to run KVM guests qemu-kvm-tools.x86_64 : KVM debugging and diagnostics tools qemu-kvm.x86_64 : QEMU is a FAST! processor emulator

hi, I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID ad3b591d147abf59 Signatures from CentOS 7 use SHA256 Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 06 Jan 2016 08:54:58 AM PST, Key ID 24c6a8a7f4a80eb5 I'm trying to find where / how to use sha256 when I sign packages but I am not having much luck. Closest I have found is this :