search for: jhays

Hi, I have a Dell T710 with 4 X 10G ethernet interfaces (2 X Dual port Intel 82599 cards). It is running FreeBSD RELENG_8 last updated on July 13. What I see is packet loss (0 - 40%) on IPv6 packets in vlans, when the machine is not the originator of the packets. Let me try to describe a little more. If a neigbouring machine ping6 it, there will be packet loss. If it act as a router for ipv6,

...and I also export /cd-farm as a share. These show up under windows browsing and I can mount them as disks or just treat them as resources under a node (i.e. \\linux\x) ... It all works great. I have 3 WinDoze'95 boxes on the home ethernet and they can all access the 14 CDs. John D. Hays jhays@Hays.Org http://www.hays.org/~jhays K7VE and VK3FHK -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 2496 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/19970730/7457f084/attachment.b...

...ing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: Anyone resolved "failed to lock SMB passwd file"? > by "Robert Dahlem" <Robert.Dahlem@frankfurt.netsurf.de> > 2) Debugging Help? > by "John D. Hays" <jhays@Hays.ORG> > 3) MS Word 97 and Samba 1.9.18p10 > by "Whiffen, Richard" <whiffen@ici.org> > 4) Q about files > by "Igor Colovic" <cigor@EUnet.yu> > 5) Problem with domain controller & win98 > by "Hans Eichbaum" <hans@nosferatu.h...

[Just curious, and seizing the opportunity to communicate with other folks who are doing the same kind of thing I am...] How are you measuring the latency? I tried measuring it with my program (also Win32-based, also using DirectSound[Capture]) and came up with around 130ms. To measure it, I placed the mic near a speaker to get feedback going, had my program connect to itself (local

Hi, After FreeBSD changed from using -O2 to using -O on their ARM port, I found that sshd stopped working. (gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]) I have downloaded openssh-SNAP-20080220.tar.gz and the code still look the same. Anyway looking into it, I found that the problem is in monitor_fdpass.c in the functions mm_send_fd and mm_receive_fd. Using -O2 used to align the tmp array on a 4 byte

Well, colleagues, I'm stuck a bit. I tried many different ways to setup system with vinum root (the only reference I found yet besides old "bootstrapping vinum" article is Joerg's commit message: http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/cvs-all_2003/msg01225.html I failed. I have 4-stable system set up at ad0, and tried to set up pair of drives for new system at ad2 and ad3 (actually,

CVSup is slow, insecure, and a memory hog. However, until now it's been the only option for keeping an up-to-date ports tree, and (thanks to all of the recent work on vuxml and portaudit) it has become quite obvious that keeping an up-to-date ports tree is very important. To provide a secure, lightweight, and fast alternative to CVSup, I've written portsnap. As the name suggests, this

In my experience most of the jitter related issues are because people are using too small of audio buffer sizes that match the framing size of Speex - particularly in Windows. This isn't a problem with Speex, but as a programmer you should collect and append a few frames to match the size of your output audio frame buffer before attempting to play the sound. -----Original Message----- From:

The audio frame speex generates sounds pretty terrible most of the time, and I don't use it for jitter correction instead I just use it for dropped packets - so I usually drop the late packet. It sounds acceptable as long as I drop less than 5% of traffic (dropping 2 in a row makes a bad robot noise, so I reset the stream in that case). The good news is that on an unsaturated DSL line jitter

If I encode something in ultra-wideband, can I decode it in wideband by chopping off bytes in every frame? John --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.

Right - and I deal with that on the receiver end based on an approximation of sender's and receiver's responsiveness - the minimum latency I've been able to get into the system is about 150 ms. Of that, jitter buffering is about 40-100ms. I'd love to figure out how to get that down without killing myself on thread switching or Win32 kernel calls, but ms has to actually implement

I've been playing with speex for use in a VoIP application between PC's. One thing I've found (correlating to the documentation) it that speex runs much faster and produced much better output when it's fed a 32kHz signal instead of a 44.1kHz sample rate. This is whether I tell it a 44.1kHz sample rate and feed it 44.1kHz or tell it 32kHz and feed it 44.1kHz. What part of the

I'm trying to get speex to encode a bit faster, mainly by rewriting a few functions in SSE and translating the GCC __asm__ to VC __asm. There's 2 functions I'm targeting, first is vq_nbest which consumes 40% of the time at high complexity and split_cb_search_shape_sign. Which consumes just over 30%. I've split out two functions from: cb_search_precompute_energy - loop at the