search for: jhay

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "jhay".

Did you mean: jay
2010 Jul 19
1
packet loss on ixgbe using vlans and ipv6
...c 0-0xdcdf mem 0xd4100000-0xd417ffff,0xd40f8000-0xd40fbfff irq 64 at device 0.0 on pci129 ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 17 vectors ix0: [ITHREAD] ... ix0: Ethernet address: 00:1b:21:57:b4:20 ix0: PCI Express Bus: Speed 5.0Gb/s Width x8 If anybody need more info, please ask. John -- John Hay -- jhay@meraka.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org
1997 Jul 30
0
CDROM on SAMBA/Linux
...and I also export /cd-farm as a share. These show up under windows browsing and I can mount them as disks or just treat them as resources under a node (i.e. \\linux\x) ... It all works great. I have 3 WinDoze'95 boxes on the home ethernet and they can all access the 14 CDs. John D. Hays jhays@Hays.Org http://www.hays.org/~jhays K7VE and VK3FHK -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 2496 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/19970730/7457f084/attachment....
1998 Nov 02
0
Fw: SAMBA digest 1861
...ing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: Anyone resolved "failed to lock SMB passwd file"? > by "Robert Dahlem" <Robert.Dahlem@frankfurt.netsurf.de> > 2) Debugging Help? > by "John D. Hays" <jhays@Hays.ORG> > 3) MS Word 97 and Samba 1.9.18p10 > by "Whiffen, Richard" <whiffen@ici.org> > 4) Q about files > by "Igor Colovic" <cigor@EUnet.yu> > 5) Problem with domain controller & win98 > by "Hans Eichbaum" <hans@nosferatu....
2004 Aug 06
1
Speex settings and jitter
...it out, encodes it, and transmits it. Otherwise it goes back to sleep. I was going to change this to use notifications but haven't yet since it's been working so well... Are you saying that notifications aren't implemented for DirectSoundCapture buffers? Tom <p>John Hayes (jhayes@thereinc.com) wrote: > > Right - and I deal with that on the receiver end based on an approximation > of sender's and receiver's responsiveness - the minimum latency I've been > able to get into the system is about 150 ms. Of that, jitter buffering is > about 40-100ms....
2008 Feb 20
1
alignment problem in monitor_fdpass.c
...So which way is the best to fix it? One way is to add __aligned(4) to the line where tmp is declared. Another is to put tmp and cmsg in an union, which will also cause it to be aligned. (I'm not on this list, so keep my address in please.) John -- John Hay -- John.Hay at meraka.csir.co.za / jhay at FreeBSD.org
2003 Aug 04
4
bootstrapping vinum root
Well, colleagues, I'm stuck a bit. I tried many different ways to setup system with vinum root (the only reference I found yet besides old "bootstrapping vinum" article is Joerg's commit message: http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/cvs-all_2003/msg01225.html I failed. I have 4-stable system set up at ad0, and tried to set up pair of drives for new system at ad2 and ad3 (actually,
2004 Oct 26
5
please test: Secure ports tree updating
CVSup is slow, insecure, and a memory hog. However, until now it's been the only option for keeping an up-to-date ports tree, and (thanks to all of the recent work on vuxml and portaudit) it has become quite obvious that keeping an up-to-date ports tree is very important. To provide a secure, lightweight, and fast alternative to CVSup, I've written portsnap. As the name suggests, this
2004 Aug 06
3
Speex settings and jitter
In my experience most of the jitter related issues are because people are using too small of audio buffer sizes that match the framing size of Speex - particularly in Windows. This isn't a problem with Speex, but as a programmer you should collect and append a few frames to match the size of your output audio frame buffer before attempting to play the sound. -----Original Message----- From:
2004 Aug 06
0
Speex settings and jitter
The audio frame speex generates sounds pretty terrible most of the time, and I don't use it for jitter correction instead I just use it for dropped packets - so I usually drop the late packet. It sounds acceptable as long as I drop less than 5% of traffic (dropping 2 in a row makes a bad robot noise, so I reset the stream in that case). The good news is that on an unsaturated DSL line jitter
2004 Aug 06
3
Chopping off the wideband?
If I encode something in ultra-wideband, can I decode it in wideband by chopping off bytes in every frame? John --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
2004 Aug 06
0
Speex settings and jitter
Right - and I deal with that on the receiver end based on an approximation of sender's and receiver's responsiveness - the minimum latency I've been able to get into the system is about 150 ms. Of that, jitter buffering is about 40-100ms. I'd love to figure out how to get that down without killing myself on thread switching or Win32 kernel calls, but ms has to actually implement
2004 Aug 06
3
Optimizing speex for 44.1kHz
I've been playing with speex for use in a VoIP application between PC's. One thing I've found (correlating to the documentation) it that speex runs much faster and produced much better output when it's fed a 32kHz signal instead of a 44.1kHz sample rate. This is whether I tell it a 44.1kHz sample rate and feed it 44.1kHz or tell it 32kHz and feed it 44.1kHz. What part of the
2004 Aug 06
4
Speex test cases?
I'm trying to get speex to encode a bit faster, mainly by rewriting a few functions in SSE and translating the GCC __asm__ to VC __asm. There's 2 functions I'm targeting, first is vq_nbest which consumes 40% of the time at high complexity and split_cb_search_shape_sign. Which consumes just over 30%. I've split out two functions from: cb_search_precompute_energy - loop at the