search for: jg4tfg

...sial: update to use ToT googletest (or at least some reasonably >> recent version of master), at least until a new release is created. >> >> Thoughts? This sounds strange. I've been using googletest-1.8.0 in my project, with fresh compilers (clang, gcc - https://godbolt.org/g/jg4tFG - tr1/tuple works) and not once did i have any issues with unavailability of Combine, even though i do use it. Debian sid: $ dpkg -S tr1/tuple libstdc++-7-dev:amd64: /usr/include/c++/7/tr1/tuple libstdc++-5-dev:amd64: /usr/include/c++/5/tr1/tuple libstdc++-6-dev:amd64: /usr/include/c++/6/tr1/tuple...

...(or at least some reasonably > >> recent version of master), at least until a new release is created. > >> > >> Thoughts? > This sounds strange. > > I've been using googletest-1.8.0 in my project, with fresh compilers > (clang, gcc - https://godbolt.org/g/jg4tFG - tr1/tuple works) > and not once did i have any issues with unavailability of Combine, > even though i do use it. > > Debian sid: > $ dpkg -S tr1/tuple > libstdc++-7-dev:amd64: /usr/include/c++/7/tr1/tuple > libstdc++-5-dev:amd64: /usr/include/c++/5/tr1/tuple > libstdc++-6-...

+Chandler who might have some thoughts on this. Could you provide an example here of the motivation for the feature you're missing? Might help motivate the discussion (and/or we'll end up nitpicking how it could be done differently without that feature... - which is sort of where I'm going with this. Combinatorial test case expansion does seem a bit suspicious to me - I'd hope we

Hi all, I'm currently writing some unit tests for some debug line error handling code I'm working on (see e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D44382), and I just ran into an annoying disabled feature in gtest, specifically the "Combine" feature for use in combinatorially generating parameterised tests. A FIXME comment in ProfileData\CoverageMappingTest.cpp suggests that I'm not