search for: jezel

...icrosoft terms... the minor version is like a service pack. So CentOS 4.7 is really a base lined version 4, service pack 7. You get the new features in major releases (like there are no more "smp" kernels in 5 to deal with) -Jonathan On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jimmy Ezell <jezell at hmhca.com> wrote: >On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:07:25PM -0700, Jimmy Ezell wrote: > >> multi-processor machine ( I had to remember to specify smp >for the kernel) > >I repeat: why bother with such an old system? Really? > >Recall the comment from the book. That bo...

...icrosoft terms... the minor version is like a service pack. So CentOS 4.7 is really a base lined version 4, service pack 7. You get the new features in major releases (like there are no more "smp" kernels in 5 to deal with) -Jonathan On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jimmy Ezell <jezell at hmhca.com> wrote: >On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:07:25PM -0700, Jimmy Ezell wrote: > >> multi-processor machine ( I had to remember to specify smp >for the kernel) > >I repeat: why bother with such an old system? Really? > >Recall the comment from the book. That bo...

...Microsoft terms... the minor version is like a service pack. So CentOS 4.7 is really a base lined version 4, service pack 7. You get the new features in major releases (like there are no more "smp" kernels in 5 to deal with) -Jonathan On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jimmy Ezell <jezell at hmhca.com> wrote: > > >On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:07:25PM -0700, Jimmy Ezell wrote: > > > >> multi-processor machine ( I had to remember to specify smp > >for the kernel) > > > >I repeat: why bother with such an old system? Really? > > > &...

...able Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090521/ec fe0455/attachment-0001.pgp ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:36:38 -0700 From: "Jimmy Ezell" <jezell at hmhca.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Step-by-Step Asterisk and MeetMe Help To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <E77AB304D41C084090D498682873252FC1B606 at nts-10.ca.hmhengineers.com> Conten...

Our small company is replacing Cisco CallManager with Asterisk (because we are tired of sending them money) and I am documenting the process as I go on my blog. I am trying to make the notes as easy as possible in hopes that I can ease someone else's pain. Here is the link: http://qvlweb.blogspot.com/2009/03/asterisk-pbx-system-install-01-what-i.html Please feel free to comment on the

I am up to post 5 on my step-by-step but I hit a bit of a snag and so far my searches have failed me, I hope someone can help. (By the way, I added an asterisk index for quick navigation on the blog http://qvlweb.blogspot.com/2009/04/asterisk-pbx-install-index.html.) Here is the snag and I am hoping for a little help from the collective. Inbound I have 2 different numbers. I can call in on both

I have a cisco 1760 phone running sip and I need to configure for our receptionist so that she can answer calls on more then one extension. What is the easiest way to configure this so that incomming calls go to the next availble extension? Does each extension on the phone need to be set seperately in the sip.conf file (see below for my example)? sip.conf file =================