search for: jerzi

Dear All, I wonder if anyone can advise me as to whether there is a consensus as to how the effect size should be calculated from GLIM models in R for any specified significant main effect or interaction. In investigating the causes of variation in infection in wild animals, we have fitted 4-way GLIM models in R with negative binomial errors. These are then simplified using the STEP procedure,

I'm running SVM from e1071 package on a data with ~150 columns (variables) and 50000 lines of data (it takes a bit of time) for radial kernel for different gamma and cost values. I get a very large models with at least 30000 vectors and the prediction I get is not the best one. What does it mean and what could I do to ameliorate my model ? Jerzy Orlowski

Hi, I try to make a binomial analysis using GLMM in a longitudinal data file. Is correct to use anova(model) to access the significance of the fixed terms? Thanks Ronaldo -- Todos somos iguais perante a lei, mas nao perante os encarregados de faze-las cumprir. -- S. Jerzy Lec -- |> // | \\ [***********************************] | ( ? ? ) [Ronaldo Reis J?nior ]

Hello I have same problem like that one from month or two ago: UD Agent refuses to run giving "invalid picture" error. I have applied patch (posted recently by Gerard Patel) to Wine-20010305 but nothing happend - same error. Then I gave a try to Wine-20010418 - unpatched/patched(manually) - same story. If someone has any ideas I would be very grateful. For those who want to or can help:

Hi, <%= select_tag ''image_id'', options_for_select(Image.find(:all) {| an_image| [ an_image.name, an_image.id ] }), :multiple => true %></p> * I am in a view, and I am trying to search the image table and make a multiple select box with each image''s name. * Right now it is working, but I see this: ---------------------------------------------

Hello, I have confirmed that the recently-reported vulnerability in Elm is also present in Elm-ME+ and thus also in Debian GNU/Linux version 1.2, prerelease version 1.3, and development tree "unstable". Below is a short diff to correct the problem. Debian GNU/Linux 1.2.x uses stock Elm 2.4pl25. Users of that version of Elm should upgrade to Elm-ME+ as detailed below. Debian 1.3

... (port 138, setting options)... [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 3] nmbd/nmbd.c:(541) open_sockets: Broadcast sockets opened. [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 2] lib/interface.c:(85) added interface ip=141.43.132.161 bcast=141.43.132.191 nmask=255.255.255.192 [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 3] lib/util_sock.c:(832) bind succeeded on port 137 ... (port 138, setting options)... [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 2]

have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts lines in your smb.conf file. Don -----Original Message----- From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: dns and samba Hi, I find that my samba server always does