search for: jepordize

The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. Do you want me to revert the changes? Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the > > llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the > > output page. All other output is normal. So,

> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the > llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the > output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. > If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp > output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My > change was

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. >> Do you want me to revert the changes? > No. I just said that we should avoid anymore changes for the next 2 weeks to > maintain stability. FWIW, I agree with Tanya on this. People *pound* on the demo page immediately after a release as they try it out and

> The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing. > > Do you want me to revert the changes? No. I just said that we should avoid anymore changes for the next 2 weeks to maintain stability. -Tanya > > Reid. > > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >>> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on

It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it. If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My change was to help people learning LLVM

Okay, let me reiterate. The llvm2cpp option is *already* on the demo script page. If you choose that option, you just get an error message because llvm2cpp can't be found. Its harmless and everything else still works. I won't change the script for a couple of weeks, per Tanya's and your request. Reid. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:48 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug

...g deployment easier, this should enhance security by making it obvious why something is enabled that you may not expect.) I have two questions: 1. Do folks agree this is a good idea? 2. As a US citizen, would you take code contributed by me to accomplish this task? I certainly don't want to jepordize the code base or break the (US) law about crypto code. (I have a preliminary patch for the case I outlined, but what is really called for is a comprehensive audit of where crypto methods are turned on and off.) -John Heidemann