Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "jepord".
Did you mean:
repord
2006 Aug 10
2
[LLVMdev] Demo Script Paths
...The demo facility is a good tool for that and allows me to
> > direct people there so they can see how it works.
>
> llvm2cpp may be a 1.8 release feature, but this is something that should
> have been added to the demo script before the release. I don't like the
> idea of jepordizing the stability of the script during this critical
> time. Critical meaning.. people will be trying out llvm and if the demo
> script fails for them.. they may likely give up and not bother with LLVM.
>
> I don't disagree with the change. I just think the timing could be bette...
2006 Aug 10
0
[LLVMdev] Demo Script Paths
...truct the
> IR in C++. The demo facility is a good tool for that and allows me to
> direct people there so they can see how it works.
llvm2cpp may be a 1.8 release feature, but this is something that should
have been added to the demo script before the release. I don't like the
idea of jepordizing the stability of the script during this critical
time. Critical meaning.. people will be trying out llvm and if the demo
script fails for them.. they may likely give up and not bother with LLVM.
I don't disagree with the change. I just think the timing could be better.
-Tanya
>
>...
2006 Aug 10
2
[LLVMdev] Demo Script Paths
...allows me to
>> > > direct people there so they can see how it works.
>> >
>> > llvm2cpp may be a 1.8 release feature, but this is something that should
>> > have been added to the demo script before the release. I don't like the
>> > idea of jepordizing the stability of the script during this critical
>> > time. Critical meaning.. people will be trying out llvm and if the demo
>> > script fails for them.. they may likely give up and not bother with
>> > LLVM.
>> >
>> > I don't disagree wi...
2006 Aug 10
0
[LLVMdev] Demo Script Paths
...ty is a good tool for that and allows me to
>>> direct people there so they can see how it works.
>>
>> llvm2cpp may be a 1.8 release feature, but this is something that should
>> have been added to the demo script before the release. I don't like the
>> idea of jepordizing the stability of the script during this critical
>> time. Critical meaning.. people will be trying out llvm and if the demo
>> script fails for them.. they may likely give up and not bother with LLVM.
>>
>> I don't disagree with the change. I just think the timing c...
2006 Aug 10
2
[LLVMdev] Demo Script Paths
It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the
llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the
output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it.
If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp
output will appear. Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My
change was to help people learning LLVM
2006 Aug 10
0
[LLVMdev] Demo Script Paths
...; > > direct people there so they can see how it works.
> >> >
> >> > llvm2cpp may be a 1.8 release feature, but this is something that should
> >> > have been added to the demo script before the release. I don't like the
> >> > idea of jepordizing the stability of the script during this critical
> >> > time. Critical meaning.. people will be trying out llvm and if the demo
> >> > script fails for them.. they may likely give up and not bother with
> >> > LLVM.
> >> >
> >> >...
2000 Dec 19
1
setup debugging suggestion and offer to help
...g deployment easier, this should enhance security
by making it obvious why something is enabled that you may not expect.)
I have two questions:
1. Do folks agree this is a good idea?
2. As a US citizen, would you take code contributed by me to
accomplish this task? I certainly don't want to jepordize the code
base or break the (US) law about crypto code.
(I have a preliminary patch for the case I outlined, but what is
really called for is a comprehensive audit of where crypto methods are
turned on and off.)
-John Heidemann