search for: jeh2

...//lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2004-October/002847.html Patch link: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041029/facb8c73/spee x-1.1.6-jeh1-0001.bin But that patch is very different (much smaller) then the dsp c5x patch at http://handhelds.org/~jamey/speex/speex-1.1.6-jeh2.patch. I had appied the patch at this link: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041029/facb8c73/spee x-1.1.6-jeh1-0001.bin and enabled FIXED_POINT and speex is running on dsp c5x So now I'm wondering, did I get the whole patch? Which patch is the one I should be using?...

I saw a thread in the list archives about a speex port to TI 55x DSP. Wondering how that worked out (is working out)? Also wondering if there is a source archive for it, or if the patch in the email archives is still current, or if there's been updates. Any info appreciated. Thanks Paul

...wondering if there is a source archive for it, > or if the patch in the email archives is still current, or if there's been >updates. > > > My patch to provide fixed-point support for Speex on the TI 55xx DSP is available here: http://handhelds.org/~jamey/speex/speex-1.1.6-jeh2.patch The issue with codebooks that Jean-Marc mentioned is that the TI 55xx C compiler uses two bytes per char, so codebooks take more memory than they need to. The whole compress/decompress fit in SRAM, though, so it probably runs faster this way and consumes less power. I did update speex_...