Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "jediknil".
2011 Aug 18
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Style question: NULL or 0?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jordy Rose <jediknil at belkadan.com> wrote:
> But I think I read somewhere that 0 is more C++esque.
I believe Stroustrup espoused this at one point (perhaps even on his
website) on the basis that using NULL gives you a false sense of
security - which isn't entirely true now that compilers (GCC & clang...
2011 Aug 17
4
[LLVMdev] Style question: NULL or 0?
Hi, LLVM. I have a question I'd like to get put into the official style guidelines: do we prefer NULL or 0 for C++ objects? I've seen both throughout the code.
Personally I prefer NULL, since it establishes that something is a pointer and not an integer (or integer-constructed object, but thankfully we avoid implicit conversions in LLVM/Clang). But I think I read somewhere that 0 is more
2011 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller
What I can think of:
1. Anonymous struct, to avoid a copy.
2. Use stdarg.h...dangerous but accomplishes what you're looking for.
3. Split up F: giant switch statements often indicate that your function is doing several different things. (IMHO...)
4. Don't worry about it, it's probably not a bottleneck. (Or rather, profile first...)
But no, there's no standard way to do this. Even