Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "jchk".
Did you mean:
chk
2024 Jul 15
1
Request for a Lockdown option
...== 0 // a32[2] == 0 || a32[2] == NTOH(0x0000FFFF)
) {
ui4 i = m_ip6.a32[3];
m_ip4 = i;
switch(m_ip6.a16[5]) {
case 0xFFFF: // mapped
m_flags = f_map4;
goto jchk;
case 0x0: // compatible?
m_flags = f_comp4;
jchk: // not any6, not loopback6
if(i != 0 && i != SF_INJ_BLE(0x00000001,0x01000000))
break;...
2024 Jul 15
1
Request for a Lockdown option
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:25:46AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
> On 14/07/2024 03:49, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> > I have read
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01
> >
> > but as an application developer i find it ugly not to be able to
> > "simply do it", and get back a mapped address.