search for: jbods

I cannot verify it, but I think that even JBOD is propagated as a virtual device. If you create JBOD from 3 different disks, low level parameters may differ. And probably old firmware is the reason we used RAID-0 two or three years before. Thank you for the ideas. Kind regards Milo Dne 10.09.2020 v 16:15 Scott Q. napsal(a): > Actually there is, filesystems like ZFS/BTRFS prefer to see

Your question is difficult to parse. Typically RAID and JBOD are mutually exclusive. By "flash-backed", do you mean a battery backup unit (BBU) on your RAID controller? On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Vincent Royer <vincent at epicenergy.ca> wrote: > >> Is a flash-backed Raid required for JBOD, and should it be 1gb, 2, or 4gb >> flash? >> > > Is anyone

Yes the flash-backed RAID cards use a super-capacitor to backup the flash cache. You have a choice of flash module sizes to include on the card. The card supports RAID modes as well as JBOD. I do not know if Gluster can make use of battery-backed flash-based Cache when the disks are presented by the RAID card in JBOD. The Hardware vendor asked "Do you know if Gluster makes use of

Some controllers has direct option "pass through to OS" for a drive, that's what I meant. I can't recall why we have chosen RAID-0 instead of JBOD, there was some reason, but I hope there is no difference with single drive. Thank you Milo Dne 09.09.2020 v 15:51 Scott Q. napsal(a): > The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you have > the latest

Hi, Trying to make the most of a limited budget. I need fast I/O for operations under 4MB, and high availability of VMs in an Ovirt cluster. I Have 3 nodes running Ovirt and want to rebuild them with hardware for converging storage. Should I use 2 960GB SSDs in RAID1 in each node, replica 3? Or can I get away with 1 larger SSD per node, JBOD, replica 3? Is a flash-backed Raid required for

Hi, Does anyone have experiences about ARC-1883I SAS controller with CentOS7? I am planning to have RAID1 setup and I am wondering if I should use the controller's RAID functionality which has 2GB cache or should I go with JBOD + Linux software RAID? The disks I am going to use are 6TB Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0034 7200rpm SAS/12Gbit 128 MB If hardware RAID is preferred, the

I don't think this is off topic since I want to use JBOD mode so that Linux can do the RAID. I'm going to hopefully run this in CentOS 5 and Ubuntu 12.04 on a Sunfire x2250 Hard to get answers I can trust out of vendors :-) I have a Sun RAID card which I am pretty sure is LSI OEM. It is a 3G/s SAS1 with 2 external connectors like the one on the right here :

> > > Is a flash-backed Raid required for JBOD, and should it be 1gb, 2, or 4gb > flash? > Is anyone able to clarify this requirement for me? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180409/0b7677ce/attachment.html>

> The disks I am going to use are 6TB Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0034 > 7200rpm SAS/12Gbit 128 MB Sorry to hear that, my experience is the Seagate brand has the shortest MTBF of any disk I have ever used... > If hardware RAID is preferred, the controller's cache could be updated > to 4GB and I wonder how much performance gain this would give me? Lots, especially with slower

> This is why before configuring and installing everything you may want to > attach drives one at a time, and upon boot take a note which physical > drive number the controller has for that drive, and definitely label it so > y9ou will know which drive to pull when drive failure is reported. Sorry Valeri, that only works if you're the only guy in the org. In reality, you cannot

On 2017-01-20, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > Hm, not certain what process you describe. Most of my controllers are > 3ware and LSI, I just pull failed drive (and I know phailed physical drive > number), put good in its place and rebuild stars right away. I know for sure that LSI's storcli utility supports an identify operation, which (if the

On Sat, January 21, 2017 12:16 am, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2017-01-20, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >> Hm, not certain what process you describe. Most of my controllers are >> 3ware and LSI, I just pull failed drive (and I know phailed physical >> drive >> number), put good in its place and rebuild stars right away. > > I

I''m not sure if this is the right place for the question or not, but I''ll throw it out there anyways. Does anyone know, if you create your pool(s) with a system running fishworks, can that pool later be imported by a standard solaris system? IE: If for some reason the head running fishworks were to go away, could I attach the JBOD/disks to a system running snv/mainline

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDacjrSCeq4 I wonder if the inverse is true. If I whisper soothing words of encouragement at my JBODs, will I get more IOPS with reduced latency? :^)

Based on your message, it sounds like your total usable capacity requirement is around <1TB. With a modern SSD, you'll get something like 40k theoretical IOPs for 4k I/O size. You don't mention budget. What is your budget? You mention "4MB operations", where is that requirement coming from? On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Vincent Royer <vincent at epicenergy.ca>

...lustre integration which will take some time will provide parallel file system abilities. I am unsure if lustre at the moment supports redundancy between storage nodes (it was on the road map) But ZFS at the moment supports Sun cluster 3.2 (no paralel acccess is supported) and new upcoming SAS Jbods will let you implement cheaper ZFS cluster easly. )2 x Entry level sun server + 4 x 48 slot Jbod) <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +9053393107...

Hi. I''m managing a HDS storage system which is slightly larger than 100 TB and we have used approx. 3/4. We use vxfs. The storage system is attached to a solaris 9 on sparc via a fiberswitch. The storage is shared via nfs to our webservers. If I was to replace vxfs with zfs I could utilize raidz(2) instead of the built-in hardware raid-controller. Are there any jbod-only storage

On 09/04/18 16:49, Vincent Royer wrote: > > > Is a flash-backed Raid required for JBOD, and should it be 1gb, 2, > or 4gb flash? > > RAID and JBOD are completely different things. JBODs are just that, bunches of disks, and they don't have any cache above them in hardware. If you're going to use ZFS under Gluster, look at the ZFS docs first. Short answer is no. If Gluster passes sync writes down to the lower level FS as sync, and you decide to use a ZFS SLOG device, usu...

Hi Valeri, Before you pull a drive you should check to make sure that doing so won't kill the whole array. MegaCli can help you prevent a storage disaster and can let you have more insight into your RAID and the status of the virtual disks and the disks than make up each array. MegaCli will let you see the health and status of each drive. Does it have media errors, is it in predictive

...enclosures. <http://xtore.com/product_list.asp?cat=JBOD> The XJ 2000 is like the x4500 in that it holds 48 drives, however with the XJ 2000 2 drives are on each carrier and you can get to them from the front. I don''t like xtore in general but the 24 bay (2.5" SAS) and 48 bay JBODs are interesting. How badly can you mess up a JBOD? -frank