search for: jbe

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 51 matches for "jbe".

Did you mean: be
2015 Oct 27
2
pregunta
...312 Saludos, Carlos Ortega www.qualityexcellence.es 2015-10-27 22:45 GMT+01:00 eric <ericconchamunoz en gmail.com>: > tambien te sirve la funcion data.table ... si no tienes instalado el > paquete: > > install.packages("data.table") > library(data.table) > jbe <- as.data.table(read.table("tusdatos.txt")) > jbe.ave <- jbe[, .("ave"=mean(Gain)), by=.(Diet)] > > > jbe.ave > Diet ave > 1: d1 280 > 2: d2 278 > 3: d3 312 > > > Saludos. > > Eric. > > > On 10/27/2015 05:16 PM, jbe...
2015 Oct 27
3
pregunta
Estimados Cuando existia epicalc, había una manera muy fácil de determinar la media de una variable (en esta caso Gain) por grupos, en este caso (Diet). ?Como se puede hacer ahora? Diet Gain 1 d1 270 2 d1 300 3 d1 280 4 d1 280 5 d1 270 6 d2 290 7 d2 250 8 d2 280 9 d2 290 10 d2 280 11 d3 290 12 d3 340 13 d3 330 14 d3 300 15 d3 300
2015 Oct 28
2
pregunta
...o con: sapply(split(datos$uno, as.factor(datos$dos)), mean(na.rm=TRUE)) pero da fallo. ¿Cómo se podría hacer para que devolviera además la media obviando los NA y que contara el numero de NA por categoria? > Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:13:45 +0100 > From: cof en qualityexcellence.es > To: jbetancourt en iscmc.cmw.sld.cu > CC: r-help-es en r-project.org > Subject: Re: [R-es] pregunta > > Otras variantes con y sin paquetes adicionales... > > > sapply(split(datIn$Gain, as.factor(datIn$Diet)), mean) > d1 d2 d3 > 280 278 312 > > by(datIn$Gain, datIn$Diet...
2010 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] [Q] x86 peephole deficiency
...nz # in Loop: Header=BB0_1 Depth=1 cmpl $2, %edi je .LBB0_6 # BB#3: # %nz.non-middle # in Loop: Header=BB0_1 Depth=1 cmpl $2, %edi jbe .LBB0_4 # BB#5: # %sw.bb6 ret the second 'cmpl' is totally redundant, which pass is (or would be) in charge of removing it? Cheers, Gabor
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...t; - 3ea: 72 2f jb 41b <__FUNCTION__.20810+0xf> > + 3ea: 72 2f jb 41b <__FUNCTION__.20724+0xf> > 3ec: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi) > 3ed: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi) > - 3ee: 76 6d jbe 45d <__FUNCTION__.21323+0xd> > + 3ee: 76 6d jbe 45d <__FUNCTION__.21236+0xd> > 3f0: 2d 67 63 63 2f sub $0x2f636367,%eax > 3f5: 67 63 63 2f addr16 arpl %sp,47(%bp,%di) > 3f9: 61 popa > @@ -11659,42 +11659,4...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the
2005 Mar 11
0
[LLVMdev] FP Intrinsics
...ptr ds:[161D6280h] 1716044E fabs 17160450 fst qword ptr [esp+14h] 17160454 ftst 17160456 fstp st(0) 17160458 fnstsw ax 1716045A sahf 1716045B fldz 1716045D fchs 1716045F fld qword ptr [esp+14h] 17160463 fucomip st,st(1) 17160465 fstp st(0) 17160467 jbe 17160498 1716046D mov eax,76E4F60h 17160472 mov dword ptr [esp+0Ch],eax 17160476 fld qword ptr [esp+14h] 1716047A fstp dword ptr [esp+8] 1716047E mov eax,15900060h 17160483 mov dword ptr [esp+4],eax 17160487 mov eax,161D6240h 171...
2010 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] [Q] x86 peephole deficiency
...# in Loop: Header=BB0_1 > Depth=1 > cmpl $2, %edi > je .LBB0_6 > # BB#3: # %nz.non-middle > # in Loop: Header=BB0_1 > Depth=1 > cmpl $2, %edi > jbe .LBB0_4 > # BB#5: # %sw.bb6 > ret > > the second 'cmpl' is totally redundant, which pass is > (or would be) in charge of removing it? MachineCSE should be in charge of zapping it. -Chris
2002 Jun 02
1
PATCH for Symbios/LSIlogic scsi and isolinux
...impact on other systems. (boot speed was very fast). Regards, Ruud L. --- isolinux.asm.ORIG Sat Jun 1 09:52:41 2002 +++ isolinux.asm Sun Jun 2 14:14:12 2002 @@ -498,9 +498,9 @@ mov [si+8],eax .loop: push bp ; Sectors left - cmp bp,byte 32 + cmp bp,byte 1 ; 1 works for LSIlogic jbe .bp_ok - mov bp,32 + mov bp,1 .bp_ok: mov [si+2],bp push si
2005 Mar 17
1
[LLVMdev] Floating point compare instruction selection
...ptr ds:[161D6280h] 1716044E fabs 17160450 fst qword ptr [esp+14h] 17160454 ftst 17160456 fstp st(0) 17160458 fnstsw ax 1716045A sahf 1716045B fldz 1716045D fchs 1716045F fld qword ptr [esp+14h] 17160463 fucomip st,st(1) 17160465 fstp st(0) 17160467 jbe 17160498 the ISelSimple generates: 1716047F call eax 17160481 fsub dword ptr ds:[16237240h] 17160487 fabs 17160489 fst qword ptr [esp+14h] 1716048D ftst 1716048F fstp st(0) 17160491 fnstsw ax 17160493 sahf 17160494 jbe 171604C7 m.
2006 May 25
2
Compilation issues with s390
Hi all, I'm trying to compile asterisk on the mainframe (s390 / s390x) and I am running into issues. I was wondering if somebody could give a hand? I'm thinking that I should be able to do this. I have noticed that Debian even has binary RPM's out for Asterisk now. I'm trying to do this on SuSE SLES8 (with the 2.4 kernel). What I see is, an issue that arch=s390 isn't
2005 Mar 16
0
[LLVMdev] Floating point compare instruction selection
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Hello, > > I didn't get any reply to my previous mail about adding floating point > intrinsics to the X86 pattern instruction selector... And I could really need > some help. Sorry about that, it slipped through the cracks. :( > Anyway, I think my confusion was caused partly by an already > existing bug in the instruction
2010 Feb 11
3
Creating a new Access database with R
...a clean new mdb-file somewhere and then copy it to the required directory with: shell("copy EmptyDB.mdb NewLocation.mdb") But that isn't very elegant... Thanks in advance, Uri Shimron _________________________________________________________________ USB$B%a%b%jBe$o$j$K$*;H$$$/$@$5$$!#L5NA$G;H$($k(B25GB$B!#(B [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Mar 16
2
[LLVMdev] Floating point compare instruction selection
Hello, I didn't get any reply to my previous mail about adding floating point intrinsics to the X86 pattern instruction selector... And I could really need some help. Anyway, I think my confusion was caused partly by an already existing bug in the instruction selection for floating point compares. The case which emits code for the special case of comparing against constant 0.0 does not
2005 Mar 11
5
[LLVMdev] FP Intrinsics
Hello, I am trying to make the FP intrinsics (abs, sin, cos, sqrt) I've added work with the X86ISelPattern, but I'm having some difficulties understanding what needs to be done. I assume I have to add new nodetypes for the FP instructions to SelectionDAGNodes.h, and make nodes for these in SelectionDAGLowering::visitCall when I find the intrinsic... The part I don't quite
2010 Jun 26
19
[Bug 28763] New: Kernel Oops when displaying a large image
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28763 Summary: Kernel Oops when displaying a large image Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2001 Dec 11
0
VirtualProtect and app crash: what's your interpretation?
...00760D5C push 75D5F0h 00760D61 call sub_75FC7B 00760D66 add esp, 8 00760D69 mov ds:dword_75D720, eax 00760D6E movzx ecx, ds:word_75D5F2 00760D75 cmp ecx, eax 00760D77 jbe loc_760EFC 00760D7D mov ecx, ds:dword_75D704 00760D83 imul eax, 28h 00760D86 mov eax, [eax+ecx+34h] 00760D8A sub eax, [ebp-4] 00760D8D cmp ds:dword_75D734, 2 00760D94 mov [ebp-...
2014 Mar 26
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] computing a conservatively rounded square of a double
On 03/26/2014 11:36 AM, Geoffrey Irving wrote: > I am trying to compute conservative lower and upper bounds for the > square of a double. I have set the rounding mode to FE_UPWARDS > elsewhere, so the code is > > struct Interval { > double nlo, hi; > }; > > Interval inspect_singleton_sqr(const double x) { > Interval s; > s.nlo = x * -x; > s.hi = x *
2008 Nov 22
5
[RFC][PATCH] Gfxboot COMBOOT module
...ile_read + stc + ret + +gfx_file_read: +; si - file handle +; eax - length of file in bytes, or -1 +; cx - file block size + + mov [file_length],eax + mov edx,eax + mov [gfx_archive_end],edx + mov edi, [gfx_mem] + mov eax,[gfx_mem0_start] + lea eax,[eax+edx+0fh] + cmp eax,[gfx_mem0_end] + jbe read_bootlogo + + mov ax,2 + mov bx,msg_bootlogo_toobig + int 22h + stc + ret + +read_bootlogo: + mov [gfx_mem0_start],eax + mov eax,[file_length] +; read file +; si - file handle +; es:bx - buffer +; cx - number of blocks to read + +read: + push eax + mov ax,7 + mov bx,trackbuf + mov cx...
2008 Oct 14
2
SYSLINUX 3.73-pre3
I just pushed out SYSLINUX 3.73-pre3. The only significant difference over -pre2 was changing MEMDISK to use "safeint" by default. -hpa