Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "jauhien".
Did you mean:
jahren
2015 Sep 06
4
Improve JIT C API
...possibility to access ORC through C
API somehow. The problem here is that ORC uses templates heavily. So I'm
looking for any suggestions on how to better wrap its functionality for C.
Also I would thank everybody who'll review my already sent patch.
[1] http://reviews.llvm.org/D12607
--
Jauhien
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150906/7bef5316/attachment.sig>
2015 Sep 08
3
Improve JIT C API
...f you're not opposed to it having them in the C bindings
proper will certainly help. That's my vote, I understand it is
different from the previous cases but the API surface area here is
relatively small.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jauhien,
>
> A few people have requested a C API for ORC. I don't think ORC's ready for a
> stable C API, but I'm not opposed to providing C bindings that will probably
> be reasonably stable in practice (though with no guarantees). I've actually
> already knocked up some tri...
2015 Sep 20
3
LLVM static libs
...e any possibility to build LLVM both as static and shared libraries?
What I see currently is that our ebuild makes LLVM to build shared libs
unconditionally. Is there a possibility (if it is impossible to build
both lib types) to at least give to user control on what kind of libs he
will have?
--
Jauhien Piatlicki
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150920/9723b91d/attachment.sig>
2015 Sep 08
2
Improve JIT C API
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jauhien,
>
> A few people have requested a C API for ORC. I don't think ORC's ready for
> a stable C API, but I'm not opposed to providing C bindings that will
> probably be reasonably stable in practice (though with no guarantees). I've
> actually already knocked up some tri...
2015 Sep 08
2
Improve JIT C API
..., 2015 at 10:41 PM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:55 AM, Eric Christopher via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:37 PM Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jauhien,
>>
>> A few people have requested a C API for ORC. I don't think ORC's ready
>> for a stable C API, but I'm not opposed to providing C bindings that will
>> probably be reasonably stable in practice (though with no guarantees). I've
>> actually already...