search for: jamatos

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > i...

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to > > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. > > > > Tom > > I have re/...

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 19:03, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 29 June 2020 13.46.02 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't > > follow any particular order (they don't need to, because nothing > > really changed). > > > >...

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 15:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbu...

I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. One functionality that I think it would be nice to have would to update a given spec file with the updated dependencies. What do you think of this? Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora > > R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). > With > > the exception of...

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 11:05, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Friday, 3 July 2020 18.36.17 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Nice! What if we create a group "R" on Pagure and a repo > > "fedora-scripts" or something like that? > > I would like to improve the scripts but FWIW here it comes a ro...

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 14:25, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > Again you guessed right, that was the main idea. :-) > As I told above and to reiterate it, the idea of this work is to make it easier to automate the > process. Similarly to how we do the mass builds for all the packages. But the mass rebuild process is very...

There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user had problems updating R 4.0.2: "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users at lists.fedoraproject.org/ thread/2FFST3GWZCNM45SX53VKB255TO4LOV4C/ TLDR; as far as I can see the user had installed (as root) a package from cran and had installed

On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 19:01, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the...

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 13:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the...

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably

On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 21:41, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 11 May 2020 16.47.55 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > AFAIK, there's this commitment only for patch versions. In fact, the > > path for the personal library is: > > > > ~/R/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-library/<major>.<minor>/...

On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 00:23, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Thursday, 14 May 2020 21.30.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Mmmh... but then you have to change that in the packages' SPEC and > > rebuild them anyway when you update R. So... what's the advantage of > > this? > > We already have oth...

On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 11:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Thursday, 14 May 2020 23.58.02 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > But we still have to rebuild the packages anyway, and this setup > > doesn't force us to actually rebuild them, nor the user to update > > them. So a user could end up with R major.mi...

On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 00:49, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > If we take the example from python where I have installed versions from python > 3.4 to 3.9 (that is yet in alpha stage). > > # rpm -qf /usr/bin/python3.? > python34-3.4.10-10.fc32.x86_64 > python35-3.5.9-1.fc32.x86_64 > python36-3.6.10-2.fc32.x86_...

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 14.01.39 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined? I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I know but time flies). I am a provenpackager so that I can drive the process. Regards, -- Jos? Ab?lio [[alternative HTML

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 17:01, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 14.01.39 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > > > Tom > > What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined? > > I asked this since this procedure will happen...

On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.10.07 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the > release version and send builds to that side tag *in order*. The part that worries me is the *in order*. :-) Do we need to do bootstrap builds that are later replaced by the real builds? Because other than that it is business as usual. :-) -- Jos? Ab?lio

On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.44.14 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > Oh, and maybe in this process we could add to all packages the > requirement on R(ABI) = 4 that Tom implemented. For that we need to start with rawhide and then change the R-rpm-macros package. Probably it should be enough to change the /usr/lib/rpm/R-deps.R script to add Requires: R(ABI)=4.0 I suggest to continue this as is