Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "jail_attach".
2004 Feb 27
0
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail
...rator to lock up a
process and all its descendants inside a closed environment with very
limited ability to affect the system outside that environment, even
for processes with superuser privileges. It is an extension of, but
far more stringent than, the traditional Unix chroot(2) system call.
The jail_attach(2) system call, which was introduced in FreeBSD 5
before 5.1-RELEASE, allows a non-jailed process to permanently move
into an existing jail.
II. Problem Description
A programming error has been found in the jail_attach(2) system call
which affects the way that system call verifies the privilege...
2004 Feb 27
0
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail
...rator to lock up a
process and all its descendants inside a closed environment with very
limited ability to affect the system outside that environment, even
for processes with superuser privileges. It is an extension of, but
far more stringent than, the traditional Unix chroot(2) system call.
The jail_attach(2) system call, which was introduced in FreeBSD 5
before 5.1-RELEASE, allows a non-jailed process to permanently move
into an existing jail.
II. Problem Description
A programming error has been found in the jail_attach(2) system call
which affects the way that system call verifies the privilege...
2004 Jul 07
0
jailutils security issue, and possible issue with 'jail'
...ecurity.html
It's not a very big issue (unless I'm missing something), simply one of
leaking the host environment into the jail.
This might be used legitimately in certain cases, but in most cases it's
probably a good idea to clear out the environment before executing the
jail() or jail_attach() syscalls.
The 'jstart' utility included in jailutils does this and it would
probably be a good addition to 'jexec' and/or 'jail'.