search for: jackasses

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3768 Summary: --no-specials in Rsync 2.6.8 breaks compatibility with 2.6.0-r6 Mirroring system Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hello, I've Googled and done some mailing list searches, but can't figure out the following . When a user on a Windows 2000 machine attempts to change their password, the change gets applied to /etc/passwd, but not to smbpasswd. The error I receive from Windows is: "The system cannot change your password right now because the domain .. Is not available". (The domain is

Greetings everybody! I started looking more thoroughly at gnome-window-decorator.c and now my head spins and "hurts" and believe that I'm not going to achieve anything serious in terms of tweakable shadows anytime soon. It's far more difficult than I expected. While I (believe) to understand now the shadows are drawn, I currently don't get why there are 12 shadow-quads and

...he XMS access functions don't seem to be applicable, either. The whole point of using the INT 15h, AH=87h interface is to let things like EMM386.EXE be able to do the "right thing" when entering protected mode directly isn't an option. Microsoft. What an astonishing bunch of jackasses. I'm thinking of producing an alternate version of MEMDISK which uses "raw" high memory accesses. I've already confirmed that it can boot this version of DOS. -hpa

why do you not simply shut up? # sieve rule require ["imap4flags"]; # rule:[reindl] if allof (header :contains "From" "h.reindl at thelounge.net") { setflag ["\\Seen","\\Flagged"]; stop; }

On 04/05/2011 03:06 PM, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > Message: 12 > Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:36:21 -0500 > From: Sherwood McGowan<sherwood.mcgowan at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Iptables configuration to handle brute, > force registrations? > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at

I got some weird mail back, claiming that my e-mail was blocked, w/o indicating what server was blocked, after the mail appeared in the mailing list. Is this some BS shakedown? I use postfix on a DSL line forwarding to earthlink, this is hardly something that should be rare in the BSD world... the mail appeared to come from a web mail server and the first link has the following lovely text:

Hey Everyone, We are in the works of planning a new * installation for our company. We have 20 users in our main office and 5 users in a remote office a couple of states away. Our call volume for the main office will be anywhere from 5-10 concurrent calls. The remote office will have about 3 heavy users with two users making calls occasionally. Right now we have an existing PBX. We have a

Hi, all I am a pabx vendor from Singapore. Recently we are going to implement a failover solution for our customers using heartbeat, the asterisk server can failover perfectly, however the g729 codec canot work, because it is binded the mac address, we have bought two set of licenses, can you provide us some workaround for this scenario? Regards, Liangliang

Remember James McGovern and his articles about Rails and enterprise? Well... Check this one out where he "puts his money where his mouth is" http://duckdown.blogspot.com/2006/04/ruby-community-proved-mcgovern-wrong.html -- -------------- Jon Gretar Borgthorsson http://www.jongretar.net/

Hi List I need a quality US 800 DID over IAX for my Asterisk server, preferably one that doesn't cost the earth. Any suggestions please? Thanks -- Chris Blunt Entropy IT Ltd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061220/4919f3cb/attachment.htm