search for: j14

...[2]     b2  <- pars[3]    rho <- pars[4]   f1 <- pars[1]*pars[2] f2 <- pars[1]*(pars[1]+1)*pars[2]^2 f3 <- pars[1]*(pars[1]+1)*pars[3]^2 f4 <- pars[1]*pars[2]*pars[3](pars[1]+pars[4]) fval  <- c(f1,f2,f3,f4) ## jacobian matrix j11 <- pars[2] j12 <- pars[1] j13 <- 0 j14 <- 0 j21 <-  (2*pars[1]+1)*pars[2]^2 j22 <-  2*pars[2]*pars[1]*(pars[1]+1) j23 <-  0 j24 <-  0 j31 <- (2*pars[1]+1)*pars[3]^2 j32 <- 2*pars[3]*pars[1]*(pars[1]+1) j33 <- 0 j34 <- 0 j41 <- pars[2]*pars[3]*(2*pars[1]+pars[4]) j42 <- pars[3]*(pars[3]^2+pars[3]*pars[4]...

...sed ~10 tests to fail, > where fail = either segv or produce the wrong output), but it did end > up breaking things. I don't recall if standalone CFL-AA causes > miscompiles, but I highly doubt the breakages I observed were > BasicAA's fault. > > WRT speed, `time make -j14` on my box (6c/12t) didn't show a > meaningful increase in compile time when CFL-AA gets enabled (read: it > got lost in the noise). So, I agree that it's probably fast enough at > the moment; if we want to enhance it, we should focus on making it > bootstrap clang+LLVM/maki...

...e many new errors (I think it caused ~10 tests to fail, where fail = either segv or produce the wrong output), but it did end up breaking things. I don't recall if standalone CFL-AA causes miscompiles, but I highly doubt the breakages I observed were BasicAA's fault. WRT speed, `time make -j14` on my box (6c/12t) didn't show a meaningful increase in compile time when CFL-AA gets enabled (read: it got lost in the noise). So, I agree that it's probably fast enough at the moment; if we want to enhance it, we should focus on making it bootstrap clang+LLVM/making it more accurate. On...

...>> where fail = either segv or produce the wrong output), but it did end >> up breaking things. I don't recall if standalone CFL-AA causes >> miscompiles, but I highly doubt the breakages I observed were >> BasicAA's fault. >> >> WRT speed, `time make -j14` on my box (6c/12t) didn't show a >> meaningful increase in compile time when CFL-AA gets enabled (read: >> it got lost in the noise). So, I agree that it's probably fast enough >> at the moment; if we want to enhance it, we should focus on making it >> bootstrap...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org>, "George Burgess IV" > <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Jia Chen" > <jchen at cs.utexas.edu> > Sent: Monday,

...0.7f0, 2 processors, PowerPC 970 (2.2), 2 GHz, 8 GB Graphics: ATI Radeon 9600 Pro, ATY,RV350, AGP, 64 MB Memory Module: DIMM0/J11, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM1/J12, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM2/J13, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM3/J14, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM4/J41, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM5/J42, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM6/J43, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM7/J44, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Modem: MicroDash, UCJ, V.92, 1.0F, APPL...

...0.7f0, 2 processors, PowerPC 970 (2.2), 2 GHz, 8 GB Graphics: ATI Radeon 9600 Pro, ATY,RV350, AGP, 64 MB Memory Module: DIMM0/J11, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM1/J12, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM2/J13, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM3/J14, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM4/J41, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM5/J42, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM6/J43, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Memory Module: DIMM7/J44, 1 GB, DDR SDRAM, PC3200U-30330 Modem: MicroDash, UCJ, V.92, 1.0F, APPL...