Displaying 20 results from an estimated 736 matches for "ixs".
Did you mean:
is
2002 Aug 29
0
yet another MDCT question
mdct.c, lines 436 onward (part of mdct_backward) state
{
DATA_TYPE *oX1=out+n2+n4;
DATA_TYPE *oX2=out+n2+n4;
DATA_TYPE *iX =out;
T =init->trig+n2;
do{
oX1-=4;
oX1[3] = MULT_NORM (iX[0] * T[1] - iX[1] * T[0]);
oX2[0] = -MULT_NORM (iX[0] * T[0] + iX[1] * T[1]);
oX1[2] = MULT_NORM (iX[2] * T[3] - iX[3] * T[2]);
oX2[1] =
2006 Dec 08
1
X using ATI ES1000: Failed to create write
I verified with my vendor that indeed we are using an ATI ES1000 Video
Card, not an Nvidia as previously thought.
I am getting the following error -any suggestions?
[38] -1 0 0x0000b400 - 0x0000b403 (0x4) IX[B]
[39] -1 0 0x0000b480 - 0x0000b487 (0x8) IX[B]
[40] -1 0 0x0000b800 - 0x0000b803 (0x4) IX[B]
[41] -1 0 0x0000b880 - 0x0000b887
2008 Jun 22
2
cant change settings in wine.cfg
I had wine loading Guild wars just fine, i am trying to get city of heroes to work properly, it loads but the graphics are not refreshing properly, eventually, about 30 seconds into the game the screen goes jittery, and displays hundreds of images of everything within view. if I do nothing for about 5 minutes, the screen goes back to normal, but only if i am looking at the ground or sky. it cant
2005 Mar 12
0
Image corruption with default X-server for Geforce 6600
Hi,
(This is a recend, as the original post was refused by the CentOS moderators
due to the size of the X-log file)
I''ve just installed the CentOS 4.0 RC1 for x86_64 -set on my new
Nforce4-based system with a PCIe GF6600-card.
When installing, the screen becomes garbled as the system enters X mode, but
installing with ''linux text'' works, until the system reboots and
1999 Oct 08
1
floor(NaN) problem fixed in massdist.c (PR#291)
Full_Name: Naoki Takebayashi
Version: 0.65.0+R-release.diff (Oct 6, 1999)
OS: Linux/Alpha
Submission from: (NULL) (129.79.224.171)
This will fix the "problem 2 (crash in fft)" in Bug ID #277
On Linux/Alpha, make check failed because R could not handle the following
example in base-Ex.R
##___ Examples ___:
# The Old Faithful geyser data
data(faithful)
:
:
## Missing values:
x <-
2023 Nov 14
1
data.frame weirdness
What is going on here? In the lines ending in #### the inputs and outputs
are identical yet one gives a warning and the other does not.
a1 <- `rownames<-`(anscombe[1:3, ], NULL)
a2 <- anscombe[1:3, ]
ix <- 5:8
# input arguments to #### are identical in both cases
identical(stack(a1[ix]), stack(a2[ix]))
## [1] TRUE
identical(a1[-ix], a2[-ix])
## [1] TRUE
res1 <-
2023 Nov 14
1
data.frame weirdness
They differ in whether the row names are "automatic":
> .row_names_info(a1)
[1] -3
> .row_names_info(a2)
[1] 3
Best,
-Deepayan
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 08:23, Gabor Grothendieck
<ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What is going on here? In the lines ending in #### the inputs and outputs
> are identical yet one gives a warning and the other does not.
>
>
2023 Nov 14
1
data.frame weirdness
In that case identical should be FALSE but it is TRUE
identical(a1, a2)
## [1] TRUE
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:58?AM Deepayan Sarkar
<deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> They differ in whether the row names are "automatic":
>
> > .row_names_info(a1)
> [1] -3
> > .row_names_info(a2)
> [1] 3
>
> Best,
> -Deepayan
>
> On Tue, 14 Nov
2009 May 17
1
X Windows has quit working
Hello,
Not sure when it stopped working as I don't use it often. Maybe since the
upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3. Can't say for sure as it's been a while since
tried to start X.
The errors I receive when startin X are:
(EE) I810(0): unknown reason for exception
(EE) I810(0): cannot continue
(EE) I810(0): VBE initialization failed
(EE) Screen(s) found but none have a usable configuration
2023 Nov 14
1
data.frame weirdness
Also why should that difference result in different behavior?
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:38?AM Gabor Grothendieck
<ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In that case identical should be FALSE but it is TRUE
>
> identical(a1, a2)
> ## [1] TRUE
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:58?AM Deepayan Sarkar
> <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
2016 Aug 25
1
sort.int(c(2, NA, 4), index.return=TRUE, na.last=NA, method)$ix differ for method="radix" and "shell"/"quick" (+ new default in R-devel)
Does sort.int(c(2,NA,4), index.return=TRUE, na.last=NA,
method="radix")$ix give the intended result, because I get:
> sort.int(c(2,NA,4), index.return=TRUE, na.last=NA, method="radix")
$x
[1] 2 4
$ix
[1] 1 3
With method="shell" and method="quick" in R devel, I get:
> sort.int(c(2,NA,4), index.return=TRUE, na.last=NA, method="shell")
$x
2023 Nov 14
1
data.frame weirdness
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 09:41, Gabor Grothendieck
<ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also why should that difference result in different behavior?
That's justifiable, I think; consider:
> d1 = data.frame(a = 1:4)
> d2 = d3 = data.frame(b = 1:2)
> row.names(d3) = c("a", "b")
> data.frame(d1, d2)
a b
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 1
4 4 2
> data.frame(d1,
2016 Jul 28
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_LPC_analysis_filter() for ARM NEON
Created corresponding unit test.
---
silk/LPC_analysis_filter.c | 8 +-
silk/SigProc_FIX.h | 8 +-
silk/arm/LPC_analysis_filter_arm.h | 60 +++++++
silk/arm/LPC_analysis_filter_neon_intr.c | 176 +++++++++++++++++++++
silk/arm/arm_silk_map.c | 14 ++
2012 Oct 20
2
Help with programming a tricky algorithm
Hi All,
I'm a little stumped by the following problem. I've got a dataset with
the following structure:
idxy ix iy country (other variables)
1 1 1 c1 x1
2 1 2 c1 x2
3 1 3 c1 x3
. . . . .
3739 55 67 c7 x3739
3740 55 68 c7 x3740
where ix and
2012 May 01
3
Data frame vs matrix quirk: Hinky error message?
AdvisoRs:
Is the following a bug, feature, hinky error message, or dumb Bert?
> mtest <- matrix(1:12,nr=4)
> dftest <- data.frame(mtest)
> ix <- cbind(1:2,2:3)
> mtest[ix] <- NA
> mtest
[,1] [,2] [,3]
[1,] 1 NA 9
[2,] 2 6 NA
[3,] 3 7 11
[4,] 4 8 12
## But ...
> dftest[ix] <- NA
Error in `[<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, ix, value
2008 Mar 24
4
Ati Low Perfomance
I have such problem: When i start Warcraft 3 (or WOW) in opengl mode (or DirectX, no matter) i got theese lines in console:
> ibGL error: drmMap of framebuffer failed (Cannot allocate memory)
> libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering
Game works fine but low perfomance. I really can't find solution in the internet.
My system:
Ati X1600 Mobility Radeon - ATI 8.3
2007 Nov 01
4
Looking for NV44 testers?
Hi all,
I tried the latest nouveau & drm drivers (both were git from today) on
my Geforce 6200 TM and - like all versions I tried before - it locks up
my computer that a hard reset is needed. :-(
On Screen is only a some pixel wide vertical stripe
Here ist the x-org log:
----------------------
X.Org X Server 1.4.0
Release Date: 5 September 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build
2006 May 14
1
Dragable element
Hey all
Im having a problem... Ok, this is the situation...
I have a small product image, on which ive floated a div over it, and
defined it as draggable. Now, this works, and i can drag it around no
problem. great. but then, what i want to do is, based on the location of
that dragable element from the top and the left, to move (using the
Effect.MoveBy method) a larger image - so effective
2007 Aug 09
4
[Bug 11919] New: XServer fails to open DRM
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11919
Summary: XServer fails to open DRM
Product: xorg
Version: 7.2
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
ReportedBy:
2012 May 20
5
removeing only rows/columns with "na" value from square ( symmetrical ) matrix.
I have some square matrices with na values in corresponding rows and
columns.
M<-matrix(1:2,10,10)
M[6,1:2]<-NA
M[10,9]<-NA
M<-as.matrix(as.dist(M))
print (M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 0 2 1 2 1 NA 1 2 1 2
2 2 0 1 2 1 NA 1 2 1 2
3 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
4 2 2 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2
5 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 2
6 NA NA 2 2 2 0 1 2 1 2
7 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 2
8