search for: ivs

Hi guys i found this encryption decryption in php and try to convert it in rails but i am unable to successfully convert it. So plz help me. I you write the whole conversion code then it will be great. PHP code is like this ================ # #/********************************************** #** #** MD5 block cypher #** #** Author..: leapinglangoor [

Full_Name: Benjamin Tyner Version: 2.1.0, 4/18/2005 OS: i686-redhat-linux-gnu Submission from: (NULL) (4.64.8.220) # Just run my.test() below in a newly opened R session. Once too many models have been fit (~20 on my system), the computed standard error jumps to a different value. This is (superficially) due to a different residual sum of squares, not a different one.delta. No other aspect of

Dear guRus, I am trying to replace "~" by "$\sim$" for TeX. However, I can't get the backslash to work. I would like to turn "DV~IV" into "DV$\sim$IV". sub("~","$\sim$","DV~IV") => "DV$sim$IV" sub("~","$\\sim$","DV~IV") => "DV$sim$IV"

Hi all, A suggestion derived from discussions amongst a number of R users in my research group: set the default column names produced by aggregate () equal to the names of the objects in the list passed to the 'by' object. ex. it is annoying to type with( my.data ,aggregate( my.dv ,list( one.iv = one.iv ,another.iv = another.iv ,yet.another.iv = yet.another.iv )

Dear R users, I would like to extract df and Mean Sq values. I tried several things (e.g., str(model1), names(model1)) but I can't find a way to extract these values. I also tried to search using RSiteSearch. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Taka, model1<-aov(dv~iv.1*iv.2*iv.3) summary(model1) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq iv.1 1 3.200 3.200

Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq notifier bit vectors, because hypervisor needs to write these bits. Let us make sure we allocate DMA memory for the notifier bit vectors by replacing the kmem_cache with a dma_cache and kalloc() with cio_dma_zalloc(). Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott at

This is a simple problem that has stumped me: I'm trying to loop through a few dozen variable names in graphs. I've tried various approaches like this: attach(mydata) ivs <- c("oneiv", "anotheriv", "yetanotheriv") dvs <- c("onedv", "anotherdv", "yetanotherdv") for (iv in ivs) { for (dv in dvs) { graphname <- paste(iv, dv, ".png", sep = "") png(file=graphname, width=300, height=3...

Hi, I want to use loop unrolling pass, however, I find that loop unrolling will introduces conditional branch at end of every "unrolled" part. For example, consider the following code *void foo( int n, int array_x[])* *{* * for (int i=0; i < n; i++)* * array_x[i] = i; * *}* Then I use this command "opt-3.5 try.bc -mem2reg -loops -loop-simplify -loop-rotate -lcssa

Thank you for your thoughts, Hal. More information below... On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: On 09/13/2017 01:01 PM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev wrote: … snip For example, the following IR will produce different sets of IV users if either: i) The order of the PHI nodes in the %loop block are reordered; or ii) The

From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq notifier bit vectors, because hypervisor needs to write these bits. Let us make sure we allocate DMA memory for the notifier bit vectors by replacing the kmem_cache with a dma_cache and kalloc() with cio_dma_zalloc(). Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> ---

Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq notifier bit vectors, because hypervisor needs to write these bits. Let us make sure we allocate DMA memory for the notifier bit vectors by replacing the kmem_cache with a dma_cache and kalloc() with cio_dma_zalloc(). Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott at

From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq notifier bit vectors, because hypervisor needs to write these bits. Let us make sure we allocate DMA memory for the notifier bit vectors by replacing the kmem_cache with a dma_cache and kalloc() with cio_dma_zalloc(). Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com>

Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq notifier bit vectors, because hypervisor needs to write these bits. Let us make sure we allocate DMA memory for the notifier bit vectors. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> --- arch/s390/include/asm/airq.h | 2 ++ drivers/s390/cio/airq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4

On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: On 09/14/2017 10:43 AM, Daniel Neilson wrote: Thank you for your thoughts, Hal. More information below... On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: On 09/13/2017 01:01 PM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev wrote: … snip For

Dear Lister, I have a question about variable selection for regression. if the IV is not significantly related to DV in the bivariate analysis, does it make sense to include this IV into the full model with multiple IVs? Thank you so much! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

David/All, Just a quick question about NSW/NUW bits, if you've got a second. I noticed you've been doing a little work on this as of late. I have a bit of code that looks like the following: %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 %2 = add i64 %indvars.iv.next, -1 %tmp = trunc i64 %2 to i32 %cmp = icmp slt i32 %tmp, %0 br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label

I've CC'ed Chad Rosier as I think this behaviour is a side-effect of his revert of IndVarSimplify.cpp (git c6b1a7e577a0b9e9cff9f9b7ac35a2cde7c448d8, SVN 217962). The change basically makes the IndVar pass change: ; <label>:4 ; preds = %6, %0 %i.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %0 ], [ %11, %6 ] %5 = icmp eq i32 %i.0, 0 br i1 %5, label %6, label %17 To:

On 09/14/2017 10:31 PM, Daniel Neilson wrote: > > >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov >> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> >> On 09/14/2017 10:43 AM, Daniel Neilson wrote: >>> Thank you for your thoughts, Hal. More information below... >>> >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Hal Finkel

Hi, Mehdi, For example, I have this very simple source code: void foo( int n, int array_x[]) { for (int i=0; i < n; i++) array_x[i] = i; } After I use "clang -emit-llvm -o bc_from_clang.bc -c try.cc", I get bc_from_clang.bc. With my code (using LLVM IRbuilder API), I get bc_from_api.bc. Attachment please find thse two files. I also past the IR here.

Hi all, I’ve most recently been grappling with a difficult to reproduce bug. I’ve traced the source of the difficulty in reproduction to the IVUsers analysis pass that is used by Loop Strength Reduction. Specifically, the IVUsers pass’s output is very sensitive to both the use list ordering of the instructions that it is looking at and the ordering of the Phi nodes in the header block of the loop