Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "ivo_mmm".
Did you mean:
io_mem
2005 Nov 28
1
Big issue regarding channel order mapping in 5.1 has been reported
I know there's a bug tracker, and that is exactly the reason why I am
posting this on the dev list. There has been a report from one of the foobar
developers regarding oggenc on the HA forums, but he later posted it at the
bug tracker as well. Three weeks have passed and no one seems to have
noticed it was there.
~*~
URL: http://trac.xiph.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/736
Subject:
2006 Jan 17
1
What the heck? A Vorbis scam?
Just today I received a weird e-mail that contained a worm (WORM_GREW.A)
attached to it.
From : Vinoth Kumar <vinoth@vinjey.com>
Sent : Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:29 PM
To : <ivo_mmm@hotmail.com>
Subject : Fw: Funny :)
Attachment : Attachments001.BHX (0.13 MB)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from vinoth ([59.144.59.103]) by bay0-mc4-f5.bay0.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:29:42 -0800
X-Message-Info: 6sSXyD95QpUgYwp2Wfb2whj19geGWFOxReSMB...
2005 Nov 05
1
New release of aoTuV
For those who missed it, there's a new release of aoTuV (beta 4.5).
According to Aoyumi-san, there's some new tuning for audio below quality set
3 (-q3), but I have not tested it myself yet.
I wonder when Monty will actually check the new versions of aoTuV and merge
them with main trunk. Latest tests on HA show the latest tunings of
Aoyumi-san have matured Vorbis a lot, and
2005 Dec 31
0
Losing definition on the midrange on latest encoders
I have found the following opinion on Vorbis' talk page at wikipedia. It
might be something interesting to consider, I suppose.
~*~
"Quality settings run from -1 to 10 and are an arbitrary metric; files
encoded at -q5, for example, should have the same quality of sound in all
versions of the encoder, but newer versions should be able to achieve that
quality with a lower