search for: ivatel

No, I would (probably) not, but I consider samba better product and with it's open nature more versatile. Anyway, thank you for clarification. ________________________________ Od: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> za u?ivatele Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Odesl?no: ?tvrtek 5. ledna 2023 14:12 Komu: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org> Kopie: Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> P?edm?t: Re: [Samba] Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash? On 05/01/2023 1...

It works for us without problems. We would like to improve security though, so I'm looking for information whether it's possible to use different hash in samba. ________________________________ Od: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> za u?ivatele Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Odesl?no: ?tvrtek 5. ledna 2023 12:15 Komu: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org> Kopie: Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> P?edm?t: Re: [Samba] Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash? On 05/01/2023 1...

On 05/01/2023 12:18, Edward Graham via samba wrote: > It works for us without problems. We would like to improve security though, so I'm looking for information whether it's possible to use different hash in samba. No, would you ask this question about Microsoft AD ? Rowland

On 05/01/2023 10:13, Edward Graham via samba wrote: > Hi, > > we sync our password from other system by directly setting unicodePwd in samba database file. We would like to drop the insecure hash stored in other system and replace it with something newer and more robust. > > Documentation on page

...? rychleji ne? jak?koli jin? medikament: a? do dosa?en? ocelov? tvrd?ho a stoj?c?ho org?nu to po u?it? pilulky trvalo v?pr?m?ru 20 minut. ? zv?t?uje penis: po u?it? penis vyrostl pr?m?rn? o 5 cm do d?lky a byl o 1 cm tlust??. ? je zv??en? kvalita orgasmu, a to jak u mu?e, tak i u ?eny:U?ivatel? Tigry poskytuj? zpr?vy o intenzivn?j??m orgasmu a tak? partnerky potvrzuj? n?r?st intenzity orgasmu na trojn?sobek. ? VA?E SPECI?LN? NAB?DKA PLAT? JENOM PRO DNE?EK! ZA KA?DOU ZAKOUPENOU PILULKU DOSTANETE JEDNU PILULKU ZDARMA!...

Hello! I am not able to joing new Samba DC to existing domain: Linux side: OS: Centos 7 Samba version: 4.9.8 (Tranquil repo) Hostname: adserver9 Windows side: OS: Windows Server 2016 Domain/forrest level: Windows Server 2008 R2 Hostname: adserver8 Domain: spcr.local I am following this guide: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory I am getting this

Folks: Over the years, many people -- including some who I would consider real expeRts -- have criticized factors and advocated the use (sometimes exclusively) of character vectors instead. I would just like to point out that, for me, factors provide one feature that I find to be very convenient: ordering of levels. ** As an example, suppose one has a character vector of labels

Hi, After our upgrade from Samba 3.x to 4.1.6 we are having major performance issues. Today, I've been able to nail it down to a simple test case. What strikes me is that Windows XP takes about 25 seconds for one job, while it only costs 3 seconds on Windows 7. I have two tests: 1000 files of 10k each (total ~10Mb): * Linux on localhost or a remote host (1GE or 10GE): 5.5 seconds *