search for: iucar

Maybe Elliott? On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:01, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 6:06 AM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > >> > > Given the huge amount of builds (and rebuilds) in this process, I am >> > > strongly disinclined to attempt this work for...

...t; Also, Tom mixed in some version bumps to the rebuild, so we'd have to > check whether those would actually be okay in a released version. I > would also appreciate some review on new (mostly test) dependencies > for these bumps. > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 09:43, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > Maybe Elliott? > > > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:01, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > > > > > Tom > > > > &...

Hi all, Three months ago, I wrote to Martyn Plummer (to his Warwick email) and offered my help to maintain and modernize this [1] rather updated README, but received no response. Does anyone know how to reach him, or maybe I should contact CRAN directly? [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/redhat/README Regards, -- I?aki ?car

On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > Given the huge amount of builds (and rebuilds) in this process, I am > > strongly disinclined to attempt this work for Fedora 32 (the idea of > > hundreds of bodhi overrides does not fill me with joy), but I would not > > prevent some...

Oh, and maybe in this process we could add to all packages the requirement on R(ABI) = 4 that Tom implemented. On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:42, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > generates it. Hope it helps. > > I?aki > > On...

...-devel/r-svn/commit/f7c46500f455eb4edfc3656c3fa20af61b16abb7 > > Dirk > > | (or 86238 for the port to the release branch) should be easily > backported. > | > | (CC Luke in case there is more to it) > | > | - pd > | > | > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > | > > | > Dear R-core, > | > > | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's > Bugzilla. We > | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no > problem > | > there. However, F...

Hi, R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R packages that need to be rebuilt: R-ape-0:5.4-2.fc33.x86_64 R-expm-0:0.999.4-7.fc33.x86_64 R-gee-0:4.13.20-4.fc33.x86_64 R-gss-0:2.2.2-3.fc33.x86_64 R-igraph-0:1.2.5-3.fc33.x86_64 R-msm-0:1.6.8-5.fc33.x86_64 R-preprocessCore-0:1.50.0-4.fc33.x86_64 R-qtl-0:1.46.2-4.fc33.x86_64 R-quadprog-0:1.5.8-5.fc33.x86_64 Could

...;t be until this weekend. Also, Tom mixed in some version bumps to the rebuild, so we'd have to check whether those would actually be okay in a released version. I would also appreciate some review on new (mostly test) dependencies for these bumps. On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 09:43, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Maybe Elliott? > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:01, Tom Callaway <spotrh at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > > > Tom > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 6:06 AM I?aki Ucar...

Thanks again, unfortunately it still fails when mounting the drive on a windows machine (even using nolease) on our end. We will prepare a fully reproducible example using a virtual machine. This could take us a day or two. ++ On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 11:05, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 10:35, Alexandre Courtiol > <alexandre.courtiol at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks a lot for persevering. > > > > I?aki, that sounds very promising, could you please tell me what > software your SMB sh...

...eated the same issue with older RPMs. Please also find the configure log attached to this email. I see no significant differences, so this supports the hypothesis that the issue is in the mount. I?aki > > Best, > > Alex > > > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 21:08, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> Update: >> >> On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 17:40, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > >> > Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the issue here. :( I mounted a smb >> > share, created a symlink from...

Update: On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 17:40, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the issue here. :( I mounted a smb > share, created a symlink from ~/R, and installed dplyr without any > issue (apart from the installation process taking ages). Fortunately, > this rules out our binary R package...

...anks again, unfortunately it still fails when mounting the drive on a > windows machine (even using nolease) on our end. > We will prepare a fully reproducible example using a virtual machine. This > could take us a day or two. > ++ > > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 11:05, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 10:35, Alexandre Courtiol >> <alexandre.courtiol at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks a lot for persevering. >> > >> > I?aki, that sounds very promising, could you please tell me wh...

...c, evn$x)) user system elapsed 2.029 0.000 2.036 > system.time(test(C_test2, expr, evn)) user system elapsed 2.307 0.000 2.313 > system.time(test(C_test3, testFunc, evn$x)) user system elapsed 2.131 0.000 2.138 I?aki On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 20:35, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 19:41, King Jiefei <szwjf08 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > It is clear to see that calling an R function in R is the fast one, it is > > about 5X faster than ` R_forceAndCall ` and ` Rf_...

...it's even easier. But then I'd use Fedora as the base image instead, because you'll enjoy binary installations for most of CRAN via Copr [1]. You even have a docker image ready to go [2]. (Disclaimer: I'm the maintainer of that project). [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/iucar/cran/ [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/enchufa2/cran2copr/dockerfile -- I?aki ?car

...e it can offer still cannot beat R itself. It is interesting to see that C++ is worse than R in this special case despite there is a common belief that C++ code is the fast one... Anyway, thanks again for your suggestions and reference! Best, Jiefei On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:39 PM I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > For reference, your benchmark using UNWIND_PROTECT: > > > system.time(test(testFunc, evn$x)) > user system elapsed > 0.331 0.000 0.331 > > system.time(test(C_test1, testFunc, evn$x)) > user system elapsed > 2.029 0.0...

svn diff -c 86235 ~/r-devel/R (or 86238 for the port to the release branch) should be easily backported. (CC Luke in case there is more to it) - pd > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Dear R-core, > > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wonderin...

...lt;jeff at vtkellers.com> wrote: > > Could TCP_NODELAY and TCP_QUICKACK be exposed to the R user so that they might determine what is best for their potentially latency- or throughput-sensitive application? > > Best, > Jeff > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 14:05, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 02:22, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote: >>> It looks like R sockets on Linux could do with TCP_NODELAY -- without (status quo): >> How many network packets are generated with and without it? If...

...It is also the default in the EasyBuild foss compiler toolchain for HPC clusters: https://docs.easybuild.io/common-toolchains/ What would be a good way to suggest or construct an update? Best regards, George > Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:14:43 +0200 > From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Ucar?= <iucar at fedoraproject.org> > To: "r-devel at r-project.org" <R-devel at r-project.org> > Subject: [Rd] About FlexiBLAS in the R-admin docs > Message-ID: > <CALEXWq2x9gygnxt6S906BkQHd139CP783bTDQC4wmeM-uKuW3g at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=...

...tlas.so.3 R and then the symbols in libsatlas take precedence over libopenblas. Or a mix between both alternatives, i.e., setting LD_PRELOAD=/path/to/some/link R and then change that link to point to openblas, atlas... Whatever suits you best. I?aki On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 11:00, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Hi Gavin, > > On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 01:15, Gavin Simpson <ucfagls at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear list, > > > > What is the recommended incantation on Fedora 32 to swap out the > > openblas BLAS that the packaged...

...Which is also available as https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/f7c46500f455eb4edfc3656c3fa20af61b16abb7 Dirk | (or 86238 for the port to the release branch) should be easily backported. | | (CC Luke in case there is more to it) | | - pd | | > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: | > | > Dear R-core, | > | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem | > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I...