Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "itsite".
Did you mean:
insite
2002 Oct 10
2
multiple sessions to same destination
Hi All,
I had a look in archives but no joy.
I just want to know before i deploy - if there is any problem with having
multiple rsync sessions from many source locations all to same destination
server ( all copying to different file systems obviously ) ?? Its jusat that
i see on the destination machine a process rsync -server being called
whenever a client connects.
Thanks !
Laurence
2002 Oct 11
4
Problem with checksum failing on large files
I'm having a problem with large files being rsync'd twice because of the
checksum failing. The rsync appears to complete on the first pass, but then
is done a second time (with second try successful). When some debug code was
added to receiver.c, I saw that the checksum for the remote file & the temp
file do not match on the first try, so (as expected) it repeats the rsync &
the
2002 Sep 27
0
Server writes...?
...hat the
last person (the 3rd team member to connect to BigServer) gets to upload
the final, uncorrupted version of "bigfile.mov" to BigServer?
Any help is greatly appreciated. I've read all the docs I could
find but did not see this addressed.
Thank You,
Derek Simkowiak
dereks at itsite dot com
P.S.> The above is a hypothetical that illustrates my question. My
real-world use is using a FAM/IMON-like trigger mechanism to have rsync
automatically distribute updated files to nodes of an LVS cluster. The
actual trigger mechanism is Linux 2.4's dnotify signal, chosen over
FAM...
2002 Sep 27
2
Rsync synchronizes unchanged files
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I wish to use rsync to synchronize a whole fat32 (MSWindows) partition
mounted into a linux system. I run rsync from linux.
The problem is rsync synchronizes most of the data even if the data hasn't
changed since the original image was made.
I used the -avz parameters to do the backup and the same for restoration.
Also I've tried just -rvz. It
2002 Nov 05
1
"Doh!", or: The Sync'ing Feeling I Get With Recursion
This message describes (imho) a behaviour bug in rsync. I'm going
to submit a patch, but before I dive into the code I want to know what the
actual desired behaviour should be. In other words, please comment.
I have some directories I want to keep synchronised between two
machines (call them "master" and "backup").
Every now and then someone deletes a file on