search for: itsecureadmin

Good morning to everybody, I?m using centos 5.6 with samba 3.5.4, I?m having troubles mapping groups in samba, I write net groupmap list, and It doesn?t show any groups, nothing, This is driving me crazy, please if somebody can give me a hand with this, I will be thankful forever.!!! Best Regards Francisco.

The last update for CentOS 5.6 included a new kernel. Now when I boot there is a message on the console saying "mounting cifs: Password". If someone presses enter it continues to boot. This is very inconvenient, since I access my machine by ssh. Is there some way to get it to boot without pausing? Thanks, John -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft,

Folks, I'm working on troubleshooting an installation where Samba 3.0.2x is joined to the domain. If I issue the command "wbinfo -t" it shows the secret is correct. If issues "wbinfo -u" or "wbinfo -g" they give an error about being unable to retrieve any users or groups. Just to test whether I could authenticate against the domain, I tried using ntlm_auth

I'm having trouble getting openldap through its initial setup. I created a /etc/openldap/slap.conf file with a default rootdn and rootpw, and they didn't seem to take effect. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I found that if there is a config directory at /etc/openldap/slapd.d, it will ignore slapd.conf. I can't figure out how to translate slapd.conf into the (new?) standard

Here's a thought I just thunk, folks: some scum, apparently in eastern Europe, has harvested my email, and is using it in the Reply-To: in its spamming efforts. Now, I realize that some mails go out from noreply, but other than that, is there a good reason why a mailserver would not be configured to send delivery failure to *both* Reply-To and From? mark

I can't seem to find the answer to this question via web search... I changed some hardware on a server, and upon powering it back on, got the "/dev/xxx has gone 40 days without being check, check forced" message. Now it's running fsck on a huge (2 TB) ext3 filesystem (5400 RPM drives no less). How can I stop this in-progress check? Ctrl-C doesn't seem to have any effect.

Hello Dovecot users, In the last week two nasty bugs were found in the new Sieve implementation. Primarily, the include extension did not work when a compiled binary was loaded from disk. This is something that is still not tested by the test suite, giving this bug the opportunity to slip through. Also, the value matching implementation would sometimes cause a assertion failure. Other than

Hello Dovecot users, In the last week two nasty bugs were found in the new Sieve implementation. Primarily, the include extension did not work when a compiled binary was loaded from disk. This is something that is still not tested by the test suite, giving this bug the opportunity to slip through. Also, the value matching implementation would sometimes cause a assertion failure. Other than