Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "iteratee".
Did you mean:
iterate
2016 May 31
0
Fwd: [PATCH] D20841: TII: Add documentation about conditional exits. NFC
...le conditional returns on PPC, but the
currently documented API for AnalyzeBranch doesn't support it.
I propose the following enhancement to the API so that I can teach
AnalyzeBranch about conditional return instructions.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kyle Butt <kyle+llvm at iteratee.net>
Date: Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:07 PM
Subject: [PATCH] D20841: TII: Add documentation about conditional exits. NFC
To: kyle+llvm at iteratee.net
Cc: llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
iteratee created this revision.
iteratee added a subscriber: llvm-commits.
iteratee set the repository for this...
2017 Jan 10
2
[PATCHish] IfConversion; lost edges for some diamonds
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Peter A Jonsson <pj at sics.se> wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
>
> my apologies for mailing you directly but it seems new user creation is
> disabled on the llvm bugzilla.
>
> We sometime lose edges during IfConversion of diamonds and it’s not
> obvious how to reproduce on an upstream target. The documentation for
> HasFallThrough says *may*
2017 Sep 19
0
RFC: Trace-based layout.
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:17 PM, Kyle Butt <iteratee at google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com <mailto:atrick at apple.com>> wrote:
>
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 6:53 PM, Kyle Butt via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org...
2016 Aug 03
2
Need help debugging a PowerPC problem
Hi,
I need help debugging a problem a problem that only shows up on PowerPC with one of my commits in the generic CodeGen parts of llvm.
I'd apreciate it if someone with access to a PowerPC system could take a look at this: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23097 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D23097>
- Matthias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2016 Dec 14
1
AtomicExpandPass and branch weighting
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:34 PM, James Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote:
> Seems reasonable.
>
> I'd note additionally that on some architectures, that the success block
> *must* be the fallthrough case (that is to say: you must not have any taken
> branches between the load-linked and store-conditional) in order to have an
> architectural guarantee that two such
2017 Sep 19
2
RFC: Trace-based layout.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 6:53 PM, Kyle Butt via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I plan on rewriting the block placement algorithm to proceed by traces.
>
> A trace is a chain of blocks where each block in the chain may fall
> through to
> the successor in the chain.
2016 Feb 22
4
[PPC] Linker fails on -fstack-protector
I found a bit weird to use address space for this, since the offset of
getting stack_guard in TCB is, unfortunately, negative:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/rs6000/linux64.h#L610
In my understanding an address space is referring to a segment register
(-on powerpc 32bit; or SLB entry on powerpc 64bit?) with a non-negative
offset value, so that it's actually accessing
2017 Apr 19
3
[RFC] Adding CPS call support
> The semantics around inlining alone are problematic enough to warrant serious hesitation.
There are nicer ways to embed CPS call/return into LLVM; I just figured that there would not be much support for adding a new terminator because it would change a lot of code. Ideally we would have a block terminator like:
cps call ghccc @bar (.. args ..) returnsto label %retpt
Where the