search for: item_text

...but I fairly often want to loop over a control with multiple items (eg Choice, ListCtrl, ListBox) to find or alter a particular item. So for those classes I wonder if we should add an ''each'' method that passes in turn each valid index into the widget: listbox.each { | i | set_item_text(i, item_text(i).upcase) } Or even: listbox.each { | i | self.item_text[i] = item_text[i].upcase } Anyway, shout if you love this or hate these... cheers alex

Hi When GenericDirCtrl#re_create_tree is called in order to refresh the tree with any possible changes made to the file system since it was loaded, it doesn''t re-expand all the tree items that were expanded prior to calling re_create_tree. I''m working on a solution to note all open tree items and after re_create_tree manually expand the items that are still present in the tree.

...en want to loop over a >control with multiple items (eg Choice, ListCtrl, ListBox) to find or >alter a particular item. So for those classes I wonder if we should add >an ''each'' method that passes in turn each valid index into the widget: > >listbox.each { | i | set_item_text(i, item_text(i).upcase) } > Everything that makes wxRuby looks more Ruby is good. Nevertheless, I don''t know if I will use this feature often. Cheers. Chauk-Mean.

...9; page_number: 5 row_text_width: email_address_yn: N survey_id: 153 other_yn: N random_answer_order_yn: N database_dsn: '''' image_width: '''' other_display_type: subitem_count: answer_total: item_text: "<span style=\"font-weight:bold\">When a good has positive network externalities, this means that when using the product:</span>" order_number: 26 item_alias: '''' image_path: '''' maximum_number_respo...

..._html :bottom,:partial, :partial => ''item'', :object => Item.new(:item_property => "Some text") #adding this parameter creates a problem end end[/code] [code=_item.rhtml] ... <%= f.hidden_field :item_property, :index => nil %> <%= f.text_field :item_text, :index => nil %>[/code] [code=index.rhtml] <%= add_link "+Add Field Dinamically" %>[/code] Does anybody know how to define a property of a new object in this context? I''ve been trying to figure it out for a month, so any help is very appreciated. Thanks Nacho --~--...