search for: it'd

Hi Andres, A topic that I'd find interesting is what it'd take to make it easier to > use profile guided optimization in the context of JIT. A few years back > I crudely hacked this together, but it was fairly ugly. It'd be nice to > make that easier. Possibly too complicated for that type of session? We couldn't go into detail,...

hi, it'd be useul if the centosplus and contrib directory can contain a small readme file or some kind of documentaion about the rpm inside. currently there is not any kind of such docs (ok johnny send a description about the kernel rpms, but if someone missed that email). eg the postfix rpm has the s...

I've been having some odd problems with samba and it's libsmb/nmblib parts. It seems to be trying to transmit data to the .63 of my netblock, i.e. the IP of the machine would be 24.240.60.20, it'd be trying to transmit to 24.240.60.63. I've changed IPs about 15 times since, and it does it to each different block I change to...

Hi Geoff, Importing symbols into the JIT from an object file or static library...? Sure! Are you interested in doing this with the C API, LLJIT, or raw OrcV2 components? The high-level answer here (which we can dig into further in the BoF) is: For object files: - For raw OrcV2 components you'll want to create an RTDyldObjectLinkin...

Hi All, The 2020 Virtual LLVM Developer's Meeting is coming up the week after next. I'll be hosting a JIT Birds-of-a-Feather session on Thursday the 8th at 10:55am PDT (See http://llvm.org/devmtg/2020-09/schedule/). I'm planning to run this more like a Round Table: Minimal introduction, plenty of time for discussion. Does anyone have any LLVM JIT related topics that they would particularly like to...

Hello, It looks like the "Getting Started" is missing some info about the gcc 4.0 frontend. Since it doesn't follow the setup of the cfrontend/gcc3.4 package, a couple sections describing the front end don't cover the gcc4 package. Here are the couple things I'd wish could be fleshed...

Le mardi 17 janvier 2017 ? 9:20 +1100, Darren Tucker a ?crit : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Romain Vimont <rom at rom1v.com> wrote: > [...] > > As a consequence, in particular, a SOCKS5 server started with "ssh -D" > > cannot proxify UDP packets. > > > > Are there deep reasons why OpenSSH does not implement...

Hi Geoff, We use LLJIT. Do addObjectFile() and StaticLibraryDefinitionGenerator work > for ELF objects? They do. :) I've not tested StaticLibraryDefinitionGenerator extensively on Linux. but we have a regression test checking basic usage. If you run into any trouble at all please file a bug and assign it to me....

I hate to use that "noob" word, but in this case I think it might be proper. Our company is getting ready to get rid of Netware and start using Samba. It will require that users log in and by doing so, have a login script map drives to particular drive letters base on either their user or group. I've been administering Centos servers for quite a w...

Is there a way using dovecot facilities to block an IP from attempting POP3 connections (similar to the sendmail access file for smtp connections)? I usually do this at my border firewall, but if there's a quick and dirty way in dovecot to do this, it'd make life a little simpler. Thanks steve campbell

Hi all, I made a new markdown editor for Mac, named Mou - http://mouapp.com It's still in early beta stage. Requires OS X 10.7+ to run. Let me know how do you think about it. :) Kudos to John Gruber who invented Markdown language, as always! :) Best regards, Chen Luo

...ory locations or evaluating expressions, etc... I just want to be able to say during an optimization pass what the best guess for the source location and variable names are for a value or instruction that the pass is doing something interesting to. Because I don't need to support the functionality of a debugger with this, it is OK if that best guess contains more than one possibility, as long as it isn't a huge number of possibilities. The idea is that I'm producing information for a programmer who needs to know what is going on during optimization, so I want to give them as much de...

Hi, I am working on using LLVM to compile parts of longrunning PostgreSQL queries into native code for faster code execution. As postgres is, nearly, entirely written in C and has long-lived (5 years) supported branches (making the higher API stability important), I'm currently using the C API. I started out using MCJIT but it looks like that's slowly on the way out. My current concern is that neither the ORC MCJIT replacement, nor the ORC C binding...

Renato, >> cortex-a9 sounds fine. It'd be cool if we verified those binaries >> run on a cortex-a8 and a cortex-a15, too. It'd be very, very strange >> if they didn't, but hey, catching very, very strange problems is what >> release testing is for, right? :) > Actually, this is a good idea, I'll se...

...ve been thinking of adding an instruction, and I'm following the > > advice in the docs to consult the list before doing something rash. > > Always a good idea! :) Instead of adding an instruction, I'd suggest > adding an intrinsic. You can mark intrinsics as not reading/writing to > memory (see lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp for example, look for > llvm.isunordered to see how it is handled). OK, I didn't know about that - thanks. > > What I want to do is provide a way to identify variable names and > > source locations that doesn't affe...

> > - kate support (what else) - this bumps the Javascript API to 1.1 > > I've not yet committed this to trunk. It does sound pretty cool Can you let me know the reasons (eg, wanting to test first, concerns over the substance of the changes, or other) ? There were no comments so far about the changes to the Javascript API, so I'll assume people have no problem with those ? Cheers

Hi Dave, To confirm - I have no plans to remove MCJIT. I don't want to change any >> behavior for existing clients. The new stuff is opt-in. >> > > Why not? We did work to remove the legacy JIT in favor of MCJIT for the > usual reasons (less code/maintenance burden/etc) - it'd seem unfortunate to > then go back to maint...

On Apr 3, 2013, at 2:07 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 1 April 2013 22:05, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > We would like to support ARM again. > > Hi Bill, > > Glad you asked! ;) > > I'm getting the test-suite bot green (a few minor tweaks and we're good) and that should get us well ahead of what we've ever been on ARM. Though, bootstrapping seem to fails a few check-all tests. I'll look into that as soon as the test-suite bot is fully green. > > Just to make sure we're talking ab...

On 23 May 2016 at 15:01, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There was, a long time ago, a backend that actually targetted C. It was > deleted in 2012 at r153307. It was largely unmaintained, and its tests were failing all the time when we targeted other architectures. I think it'd be cool to have a back-end targeting C/C++, but it'd have to be reasonably self-contained and updated to continue in tree. cheers,...

Dear list, I have a small feature request regarding the implementation of 'file.path()': It'd be great if 'file.path()' would allow to specify an input *vector* instead of solely rely on a specification via the three dot argument. AFAIU, currently it's only possible to "manually" specify each path component via the three dot argument: > file.path(letters[1...