Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "isvn00".
Did you mean:
hsv400
2010 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] [patch] MicroBlaze Backend
...tionDAG &DAG) {
Likewise
>+def : Proc<"v400", []>;
>+def : Proc<"v500", []>;
>+def : Proc<"v600", []>;
>+def : Proc<"v700", []>;
>+def : Proc<"v710", []>;
What's the difference between them then? isVN00() predicates are not used.
>+ DataLayout(std::string("E-p:32:32-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-n32")),
I'm confused. What are the native types for this arch?
>+static cl::opt<bool> HasFPUOpt(
>+ "mb-has-fpu",
As Jakob already said - remove these, you should use subtar...
2010 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] MicroBlaze Backend
On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Wesley Peck wrote:
> I have been working on a LLVM backend for the MicroBlaze soft-processor:
> http://www.xilinx.com/tools/microblaze.htm
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroBlaze
Very Cool!
> Attached is the initial MicroBlaze patch. It does the following:
> 1. Adds mblaze as a target in configure and configure.ac
> 2. Adds mblaze specific
2010 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] MicroBlaze Backend
...>> +def : Proc<"v400", []>;
>> +def : Proc<"v500", []>;
>> +def : Proc<"v600", []>;
>> +def : Proc<"v700", []>;
>> +def : Proc<"v710", []>;
> What's the difference between them then? isVN00() predicates are not used.
These have not been completed yet. Some of the earlier processors don't support all of the instructions but I have not gotten around to enumerating all of the features that each processor supports. This will probably be done for the next patch.
>
>> + Dat...
2010 Jan 29
3
[LLVMdev] [patch] MicroBlaze Backend
I have been working on a LLVM backend for the MicroBlaze soft-processor:
http://www.xilinx.com/tools/microblaze.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroBlaze
Attached is the initial MicroBlaze patch. It does the following:
1. Adds mblaze as a target in configure and configure.ac
2. Adds mblaze specific intrinsics in include/llvm/IntrinsicsMBlaze.td and include/llvm/Intrinsics.td
3. Adds mblaze