Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "isunpckl_v_undef_mask".
2010 Sep 21
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX
...------------
r112805 | bruno | 2010-09-01 21:20:26 -0700 (Wed, 01 Sep 2010) | 1 line
Move condition out to prepare for more matching
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r112804 | bruno | 2010-09-01 20:57:58 -0700 (Wed, 01 Sep 2010) | 1 line
Remove checking for isUNPCKL_v_undef_Mask, the specific node is already emitted for it
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This one maybe caused the MMX regression?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r112806 | bruno | 2010-09-01 22:23:12 -0700 (Wed, 01 Sep 2010) |...
2010 Sep 08
8
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Nicolas Capens
<nicolas.capens at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> It's not broken, but the performance is crippled.
>
> I noticed that the code still contains some MMX instructions, but several
> operations get expanded (apparently swizzling and such get expanded to a
> large number of byte moves).
I think some changes related to