Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "istruncstoreleg".
Did you mean:
istruncstorelegal
2012 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Replacing EVT:s with MVT:s (when possible)
...these cases?
For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT:
getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass
Regards,
Patrik Hägglund
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121203/d72ae610/attachment.htm...
2012 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Replacing EVT:s with MVT:s (when possible)
...gt; For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT:
>
> getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass
>
Please do. MVT is cheaper than EVT and conceptually cleaner when dealing with physical machine types. EVT should only be used in parts of the code generator that are "pre-legalizat...
2014 Nov 26
6
[LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote:
> > From: Daniel Sanders
> > Sent: 25 November 2014 17:39
> > To: Eric Christopher; Tom Stellard
> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu)
> > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
> >
> > > > > > I'd also like to propose the inclusion of
2012 Dec 06
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Replacing EVT:s with MVT:s (when possible)
...these cases?
For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT:
getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass
Please do. MVT is cheaper than EVT and conceptually cleaner when dealing with physical machine types. EVT should only be used in parts of the code generator that are "pre-legalization&qu...
2014 Nov 29
17
[LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
...view=rev
>
> Missing test from r216989
>
>
> Fix assigning garbage to floats in some cases:
>
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=217410&view=rev
>
> Set trunc store action to Expand for all X86 targets.
>
> When compiling without SSE2, isTruncStoreLegal(F64, F32) would return Legal, whereas with SSE2 it would return Expand. And since the Target doesn't seem to actually handle a truncstore for double -> float, it would just output a store of a full double in the space for a float hence overwriting other bits on the stack.
>
> Pa...