Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ispostdom".
2017 Dec 08
3
Issue with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
...e
diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/DominanceFrontier.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/DominanceFrontier.h
index a304dff..e743d2d 100644
--- a/include/llvm/Analysis/DominanceFrontier.h
+++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/DominanceFrontier.h
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ protected:
static constexpr bool IsPostDominators = IsPostDom;
public:
- DominanceFrontierBase() = default;
+ DominanceFrontierBase() { }
/// getRoots - Return the root blocks of the current CFG. This may include
/// multiple blocks if we are computing post dominators. For forward
seems to fix the problem and I...
2017 Jul 17
2
An update on the DominatorTree and incremental dominators
...uses it only when
ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECK is enabled, or when the -verify-dom-info command
line option is set to 1. Some of the transforms assume that calling
DT.verifyDomTree() is fast, so we cannot turn it on by default.
-
Dominators and Postdominators are now different types, i.e. IsPostDom is
a template argument and not a runtime value. It is no longer possible to
assign a PostDomTree to a DomTree (or the other way round).
And now the big thing: support for incremental updates (insertEdge and
deleteEdge) has just landed upstream. This should make updating
DominatorTree much e...
2009 Jun 02
3
[LLVMdev] Is there a control dependence graph builder?
Hi,
In browsing through the LLVM source, I don't currently see an implementation
for a control dependence graph builder. Am I overlooking something?
It doesn't look like LLVM currently provides a way to build the
post-dominance frontier of the reverse CFG, either. Dominators.h mentions
forward dominators, but I believe all this is referring to is dominators as
opposed to post-dominators,