search for: isoptim

...6 %d) #4 !dbg !69 { entry: %d.addr = alloca i16, align 1 %i = alloca i16, align 1 ... } !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} !llvm.module.flags = !{!84, !85} !llvm.ident = !{!86} !0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.8.0 Revision 72230", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: 1, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !3, subprograms: !12, globals: !73) ... !12 = !{!13, !54, !57, !60, !61, !62, !65, !66, !67, !68, !69} !13 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !14, file: !14, line: 15, type: !15, isLocal: false, isDefin...

...%d.addr = alloca i16, align 1 %i = alloca i16, align 1 ... } !llvm.dbg.cu<http://llvm.dbg.cu> = !{!0} !llvm.module.flags = !{!84, !85} !llvm.ident = !{!86} !0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.8.0 Revision 72230", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: 1, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !3, subprograms: !12, globals: !73) ... !12 = !{!13, !54, !57, !60, !61, !62, !65, !66, !67, !68, !69} !13 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !14, file: !14, line: 15, type: !15, isLocal: false, isDefin...

...= alloca i16, align 1 > > ... > > } > > > !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} > > !llvm.module.flags = !{!84, !85} > > !llvm.ident = !{!86} > > > !0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: > "clang version 3.8.0 Revision 72230", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, > emissionKind: 1, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !3, subprograms: !12, globals: > !73) > > ... > > !12 = !{!13, !54, !57, !60, !61, !62, !65, !66, !67, !68, !69} > > !13 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !14, file: !14, line: &...

...16, align 1 > > ... > > } > > > > !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} > > !llvm.module.flags = !{!84, !85} > > !llvm.ident = !{!86} > > > > !0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: > "clang version 3.8.0 Revision 72230", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, > emissionKind: 1, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !3, subprograms: !12, globals: > !73) > > ... > > !12 = !{!13, !54, !57, !60, !61, !62, !65, !66, !67, !68, !69} > > !13 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !14, file: !14, line: &...

...%i = alloca i16, align 1 > ... > } > > !llvm.dbg.cu <http://llvm.dbg.cu/> = !{!0} > !llvm.module.flags = !{!84, !85} > !llvm.ident = !{!86} > > !0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.8.0 Revision 72230", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: 1, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !3, subprograms: !12, globals: !73) > ... > !12 = !{!13, !54, !57, !60, !61, !62, !65, !66, !67, !68, !69} > !13 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "main", scope: !14, file: !14, line: 15, type: !15, isLocal: fa...

I'm not as familiar with all the ins and outs of metadata as maybe I should be, but ultimately the inlined function should have a DWARF description contained within the description of the caller (which is why you're seeing the call to constructAbstractSubprogramScopeDIE). That suggests that the DISubprogram for the inlined function ought to remain, and its scope should be the

Hi - attached is a patch to enable building DragonEgg (x86_64) for LLVM3.3 and LLVM3.4. That is, add these changes to the 3.3 release, and it becomes possible to build DragonEgg against a llvm3.4 compiler. Regards, Richard Gorton Cognitive Electronics rcgorton at cog-e.com ---------- -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name:

...metadata !31), !dbg !50 ... rest of function code } !46 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass", linkageName: "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !15, file: !1, line: 1, type: !25, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial | DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, declaration: !47, variables: !2) and the cloned function: ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable define linkonce_odr void @_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2EvCloned(%struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, { [6 x i8*] }* %newparam) unnamed_addr #4 align 2 !dbg !73 { entry: %this.addr = alloca...

Hi all, I would like to understand the strip-dead-debug-info transformation. In my test case there is a static inline function with two local variables. It appears that the function is already inlined before strip-dead-debug-info starts its work. As a result the DICompileUnit is cleaned and its subprograms list has no reference to the DISubprogram for the inlined function, but as there is

...FunctionPass Manager Module Verifier Bitcode Writer !dbg attachment points at wrong subprogram for function !16 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "caller", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 11, type: !17, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 12, flags: DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: true, variables: !19) void ()* @caller %call.i = call i32 (i32, i8*, i8*, ...) @__android_log_print(i32 3, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([5 x i8], [5 x i8]* @.str.3, i32 0, i32 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([9 x i8], [9 x i8]* @.str.1.4, i32 0, i32 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([111 x i8],...

...return p->x; } int bar() { A a; return foo<B>(&a); } Reason for this behavior is the explicit cast "(T*)", which leads into the following IR: !0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C_plus_plus, file: !1, producer: "clang version 3.9.0 (trunk 267335)", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !2, retainedTypes: !3) !3 = !{!4} !4 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_pointer_type, baseType: !5, size: 32, align: 32) <----------------- No Scope, leads to compile unit scope!! !5 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_typedef, name: "T&quot...

...t; Module Verifier > Bitcode Writer > !dbg attachment points at wrong subprogram for function > !16 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "caller", scope: !1, file: !1, line: > 11, type: !17, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 12, flags: > DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: true, variables: !19) > void ()* @caller > %call.i = call i32 (i32, i8*, i8*, ...) @__android_log_print(i32 3, i8* > getelementptr inbounds ([5 x i8], [5 x i8]* @.str.3, i32 0, i32 0), i8* > getelementptr inbounds ([9 x i8], [9 x i8]* @.str.1.4, i32 0, i32 0), i8* > getelement...

...ws.llvm.org/D74470, I am trying to move five of the DIFlags to DISPFlag for the moment namely DIFlagExplicit, DIFlagPrototyped, DIFlagNoReturn, DIFlagThunk, DIFlagAllCallsDescribed. The llvm ir format for DISubprogram currently has backword compatibility where the isLocal, isDefinition, virtuality, isOptimized and SPFlags are mutually exclusive. My question is, is it a good idea to remove the booleans support'(isLocal, isDefinition) and move most of it to spflags and flags in llvm ir? The llvm ir backward compatibility does not list the clear requirements on documentations page. This change affec...

...rifier >> Bitcode Writer >> !dbg attachment points at wrong subprogram for function >> !16 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "caller", scope: !1, file: !1, line: >> 11, type: !17, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 12, flags: >> DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: true, variables: !19) >> void ()* @caller >> %call.i = call i32 (i32, i8*, i8*, ...) @__android_log_print(i32 3, i8* >> getelementptr inbounds ([5 x i8], [5 x i8]* @.str.3, i32 0, i32 0), i8* >> getelementptr inbounds ([9 x i8], [9 x i8]* @.str.1.4, i32 0, i32 0), i8*...

...of function code > > } > > !46 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass", linkageName: > "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !15, file: !1, line: 1, type: !25, isLocal: > false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial | > DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, declaration: !47, > variables: !2) > > > and the cloned function: > > ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable > define linkonce_odr void @_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2EvCloned(%struct.MyFunnyClass* > %this, { [6 x i8*] }* %newparam) unnamed_addr #4 align 2 !d...

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 6:52 AM <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Xin > > Tong via llvm-dev > > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 9:33 PM > > To: llvm-dev > > Subject: [llvm-dev] ThinLTO Bug ? > > > > Hi > > > > I

...f" } attributes #3 = { nounwind readnone speculatable } attributes #4 = { argmemonly nounwind } !llvm.module.flags = !{!0} !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1} !0 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2, producer: "zig 0.0.0", isOptimized: false, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !3, globals: !47) !2 = !DIFile(filename: "test", directory: ".") !3 = !{!4, !40} !4 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_enumeration_type, name: "Os", scope: !5, file: !5, line: 1, baseType: !6, size: 8, align: 8...

...>>>> } >>>> >>>> !46 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass", linkageName: "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !15, file: !1, line: 1, type: !25, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial | DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, declaration: !47, variables: !2) >>> >>> and the cloned function: >>> >>>> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable >>>> define linkonce_odr void @_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2EvCloned(%struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, { [6 x i8*] }*...

...#5 = { nounwind readnone } attributes #6 = { nobuiltin } attributes #7 = { alwaysinline nobuiltin } !llvm.module.flags = !{!0} !llvm.dbg.cu = !{!1} !0 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} !1 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C99, file: !2, producer: "zig 0.0.0", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, enums: !3, globals: !12) !2 = !DIFile(filename: "test", directory: ".") !3 = !{!4} !4 = !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_enumeration_type, name: "GlobalLinkage", scope: !5, file: !5, line: 126, baseType: !6, size: 8, a...

Hello, One of my Julia programs failed to execute with the following error, DICompileUnit not listed in llvm.dbg.cu !11 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C89, file: !3, producer: "julia", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0,emissionKind: FullDebug, enums : !12) This was generated by verifyModule(*GPUModule,&(llvm::errs())From whithin PPCGCodeGeneration.cpp in Polly. >From <llvm_src>/test/Verifier/dbg-orphaned-compileunit.ll, I understand that the debug info, of a compile uni...