search for: isomorphism

Dear All, Sorry for the typoes earlier, let me repost the question. Suppose I want to generate sequences of length 3 from two symbols {1,2}, we get the following 8 sequences 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 However, I do not want all these 8 sequences. I call two sequencs to be isomorphic if one sequence could be obtained from the other by relabelling the symbols. For example,

...eir respective isomorphic data flow > graphs (say, put them into two separate functions) > 3. An exact graph based code folding outliner would be able to discover if > the two dataflow graphs are isomorphic (that is basically what I mean by > exact) and outline them. > 4. Thus, graph isomorphism on dags can be solved with such an algorithm > and thus the outlining problem is GI-hard and a polynomial time solution > would be a big breakthrough in CS. > First, you'd have to reduce them in both directions to prove that ;) All that's been shown is that you can reduce it to a...

On 9/29/2020 14:37, David Chisnall via llvm-dev wrote: > On 28/09/2020 15:45, Matt P. Dziubinski via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hey, I noticed this talk from the EuroLLVM 2015 >> (https://llvm.org/devmtg/2015-04/slides/pslp_slides_EUROLLVM2015.pdf) >> on the PSLP vectorization algorithm (CGO 2015 paper: >> http://vporpo.me/papers/pslp_cgo2015.pdf). >> >> Is anyone

Dear R users, i have this problem with matrices i want to check between two matrices if they are isomorphic i will give an example for what excactly i want   1 -1  1                                 -1  1   1 -1   1  -1                                1  -1  -1   1  1   -1                                1   1  -1 this two matrices are isomorphic beacause if i change the first 2 columns the matrices

Hi all, I want to find all the mappings of one graph in another graph, based on their vertex labels Is there any way to do this in igraph based on vertex labels. (as far as i know Igraph allows the subgraph isomorphism based only on vertex and edge colors) Eg: graph 1: x(1) x(2) x(2) y(3) y(4) x(1) z(5) x(2) graph 2: x(1) y(2) # the brackets contain the corresponding vertex ids i would like my output to contain the two mappings from graph 1 i.e x(2) y(3) & x(1) y(4) Regards, Himanshu Mittal [[alternati...

I have 3003 16x5 submatrices from a hadamard matrice of 16x15. I want to write an algorithm that check all of these 3003 matrices if they are isomorphic and i want to find and keep the non-isomorphic ones. Any help will be welcome.  [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R users,  I have 2 matrices dim(16x5) below and i want to write an algorithm that check the 2 matrices if they are isomorphic ones (Isomorphic matrices: if I change the rows or/and columns or/and zeros into 1 and 1 into zeros in a row(s) or column(s) are the 2 matrices identical). 0    0    0    0    0  1    0    1    0    1  0    1    1    0    0  1    1    0    0    1  0    0    0    1    1

In the current mangling scheme for overloaded intrinsics we include overloaded type names in the intrinsic name. For example: %struct.foobar = type { i32 } declare <4 x %struct.foobar*> @llvm.masked.load.v4p0struct.foobar(<4 x %struct.foobar*>*, i32, <4 x i1>, <4 x %struct.foobar*>) Verifier checks that an overloaded intrinsic name matches with its signature. When

While playing with SLPVectorizer, I notice that it will happily vectorize cases involving extractelement/insertelement, but won't vectorize isomorphic cases involving extractvalue/insertvalue (such as the attached example). Is that something that could be straightforward to add to SLPVectorizer, or are there some hard issue? In particular, the transformation would seem to require casts of

On 18 April 2016 at 19:22, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 04/18/2016 09:45 AM, Artur Pilipenko via llvm-dev wrote: > > In the current mangling scheme for overloaded intrinsics we include > overloaded type names in the intrinsic name. For example: > > %struct.foobar = type { i32 } > declare <4 x %struct.foobar*>

Am Mi., 29. Mai 2019 um 13:31 Uhr schrieb Shawn Landden via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:49 AM David Jones via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Under certain circumstances, my compiler outputs basic blocks having the same function: > > > > bb_97: ;

Is it legal to substitute non struct type instead of opaque type? For example: ; 1.ll declare void @F(i32*) ; 2.ll %T1 = type opaque declare void @F(%T1*) Is it normal to replace T1 with i32 here? If yes. Will the next types are isomorphic?: %T1 = type opaque { i32, %T1* } { i32, i32* } -Stepan.

i have this problem with matrices i want to check between two matrices if they are isomorphic i will give an example for what excactly i want   1 -1  1                                 -1  1   1 -1   1  -1                                1  -1  -1   1  1   -1                                1   1  -1 this two matrices are isomorphic beacause if i change the first 2 columns the matrices are identical

...eterministic algorithm for Matching Weighted Graphs with bounded degree. Now we all know Graph matching is non-tractable but when degree of vertex has upper bound are there any tractable algorithm? Does this special case comes under 'Finite Parameter Tractability' ? Also we know that Graph isomorphism where degree of vertex has upper bound has tractable algorithms. So will it be possible to reduce the Graph matching problem with bounded degree to Graph isomorphism of bounded degree problem then our original problem will have tractable solution. Appreciate any help or pointer which may take us c...

> > > I don't agree, but this is because I fail to see how the two > representations (the GCC-like one you've outlined and the current one with > the proposed extension) aren't completely isomorphic. Your proposal is: > > Lots of data structures are completely isomorphic in the same way, and in plenty of those cases, one is completely unusable, and the other

On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: > Is it legal to substitute non struct type instead of opaque type? > > For example: > ; 1.ll > declare void @F(i32*) > > ; 2.ll > %T1 = type opaque > declare void @F(%T1*) > > Is it normal to replace T1 with i32 here? Yes, the linker will do this, because it is forced to break type safety to link up the

OK. So if we have two modules with the same function name. This functions may not be isomorphic. For example, we can link this files, but the function types are not isomorphic: ; 1.ll %T1 = type opaque declare i32 @foo(%T1*) ; 2.ll define i32 @foo(i32* %v) {...something...} But at the same time we should not map next two functions (PR11627): ; 3.ll declare i32 @foo(i16* %v) ; 4.ll define

Dear R users, I want a help to write an algorithm for swapping rows and columns in a matrix thanks in advance [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm looking for where in the source recycling and vector multiplication+addition are defined. I see some stuff in ~/src/main/arithmetic.c. Is there anywhere else I should be looking as well? Cheers -- isomorphisms at sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org

On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:38, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2008 16:06:35 -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> On 2008-05-06, at 13:42, Hendrik Boom wrote: >> >>> One more question. I hope you're not getting tired of me already. >>> Does generating LLVM code have to proceed in any particular order? >>> >>> Of course, if I am writing