search for: isohybridization

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 465 matches for "isohybridization".

2014 Jun 21
2
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi, > > > Not being compatible with EFI/GPT is already a problem for the Perl > > variant. > > The relation of both is: > > isohybrid.in/.pl is being left behind. > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/utils/Makefile > has: > SCRIPT_TARGETS += isohybrid.pl # about to be obsoleted > > isohybrid.c replaces it feature-wise
2014 Jun 20
3
[PATCH] isohybrid: fix overflow on 32 bit system
When call isohybrid with option '-u', it overflows on a 32 bits host. It seeks to 512 bytes before the end of the image to install gpt header. If the size of image is larger than LONG_MAX, it overflows fseek() and cause error: isohybrid: image-x86-64-20140505110100.iso: seek error - 8: Invalid argument Replace fseek with fseeko to fix this issue. Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang at
2010 Apr 12
2
Patch to port isohybrid.pl to isohybrid.c
Hello all, Past few days I was working on porting the isohybrid perl script to c. (-> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/ticket/15) The first patch towards the same is attached with this mail. And the same could also be accessed from: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/syslinux-3.86-isohybrid.patch I would really appreciate it if somebody could have a look at it and let me know
2014 Jun 21
2
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi, > > Ady: > > Since both included variants are currently different, and both > > variants have problems > > I am not aware of problems of the perl version. It is just lacking > the newer features which support EFI/GPT and Mac/APM. > The known bugs of isohybrid.c are with those newer features. > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2012-May/017843.html >
2012 Jun 09
5
Build failure for isohybrid
Dear list, I have been trying to debug a build failure for a while in the utils directory on isohybrid which seems to be distro specific. On Fedora 17 64bit the build completes without problems, but under both Ubuntu 32/64bit 11.10 and 12.04 I get the following: tim at oxygen:/usr/src/git/syslinux/utils$ make gcc -O2 -luuid -o isohybrid isohybrid.o isohdpfx.o isohybrid.o: In function
2014 Jun 22
16
Announcing a patch series for isohybrid.c
Hi, following will be 6 patch proposals for isohybrid.c 1: Encode GPT partition names as UTF-16LE 2: Correct blocking factor in APM partition block counts 3: Correct end block address of first GPT partition 4: Write GPT backup to the very end of the image 5: Change all fseek(3) to fseeko(3) 6: Introduce option --mbr and make isohybrid.c compilable standalone If the form needs adjustments,
2014 May 12
4
[PATCH] isohybrid: fix overflow on 32 bit system
When call isohybrid with option '-u', it overflows on a 32 bits host. It seeks to 512 bytes before the end of the image to install gpt header. If the size of image is larger than LONG_MAX, it overflows fseek() and cause error: isohybrid: wrlinux-image-x86-64-20140505110100.iso: seek error - 8: Invalid argument Check the offset and call fseek() multi-times if offset is too large.
2014 Jun 22
5
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi, > > > All the "isohybrid.exe" I know of are based on the Perl variant. > > I just got one from > http://www.filewatcher.com/m/isohybrid.exe.39568-0.html > > Its strings seem not to stem from isohybrid.pl. > > Digging in slitaz source brought a shell script (that would be > variant #5 then): >
2015 Feb 17
0
isohybrid and ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes vs. VirtualBox
> Hi, > > at [Tails] we're in the process of shipping hybrid ISO images by > default again. We're using `isohybrid -h 255 -s 63' to do that (thanks > to the advice we got on this mailing-list a few months ago!). > > And then, we've discovered that sometimes, isohybrid produces ISO > images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes. > > Who cares?
2015 Feb 17
2
isohybrid and ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes vs. VirtualBox
Hi, at [Tails] we're in the process of shipping hybrid ISO images by default again. We're using `isohybrid -h 255 -s 63' to do that (thanks to the advice we got on this mailing-list a few months ago!). And then, we've discovered that sometimes, isohybrid produces ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes. Who cares? ... may you ask. Well, apparently, VirtualBox does:
2014 Jun 22
0
isohybrid has 2 variants
Hi, > All the "isohybrid.exe" I know of are based on the Perl variant. I just got one from http://www.filewatcher.com/m/isohybrid.exe.39568-0.html Its strings seem not to stem from isohybrid.pl. Digging in slitaz source brought a shell script (that would be variant #5 then): http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/file/313b384e2a06/syslinux/stuff/tools/isohybrid.sh But isohybrid.exe must
2014 Jun 21
4
isohybrid has 2 variants
>What I reminder from it: > > The first "isohybrid" was in perl. > But that made perl a run-time dependency. > > A compiled version of "isohybrid" removed that > run-time dependency on perl. > > >What I think of it: > > The Perl variant of isohybrid should be removed > from the source tree. One advantage of the Perl one for me
2014 May 12
2
[PATCH] isohybrid: fix overflow on 32 bit system
On 2014?05?12? 10:49, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/11/2014 06:56 PM, Kai Kang wrote: >> When call isohybrid with option '-u', it overflows on a 32 bits host. It >> seeks to 512 bytes before the end of the image to install gpt header. If >> the size of image is larger than LONG_MAX, it overflows fseek() and >> cause error: >> >> isohybrid:
2014 May 13
2
[PATCH] isohybrid: fix overflow on 32 bit system
On 2014?05?12? 22:38, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > That is because it needs to use fseeko() and use off_t. Do you mean it does need a patch for isohybrid.c. And the patch looks like: #if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64 fseeko(...) #else fseek(...) Regards, Kai > > On May 11, 2014 11:53:17 PM PDT, Kang Kai <Kai.Kang at windriver.com> wrote: >> On 2014?05?12? 10:49, H. Peter
2015 Feb 18
3
isohybrid and ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes vs. VirtualBox
Hi, it would be interesting to know for what solution TAILS decides and whether any problems arise with it. ------------------------------------------------------- On with the fundamental discussion of MBR cylinders: Ady wrote: > 1_ The resulting ISO9660 file system size shall be a multiple of 2048 > (bytes_per_sector). The known ISO production programs comply to this condition.
2014 Jun 21
0
isohybrid has 2 variants
Hi, > Not being compatible with EFI/GPT is already a problem for the Perl > variant. The relation of both is: isohybrid.in/.pl is being left behind. http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/utils/Makefile has: SCRIPT_TARGETS += isohybrid.pl # about to be obsoleted isohybrid.c replaces it feature-wise and adds new features. Only those new features contain the bugs,
2014 Jun 24
2
[syslinux:master] isohybrid: Function to write UTF-16LE strings
Op 2014-06-23 om 20:09 schreef syslinux-bot for H. Peter Anvin: > Commit-ID: f9dad5340bcefe34d860e991e8743be01a4d6c3c > Gitweb: http://www.syslinux.org/commit/f9dad5340bcefe34d860e991e8743be01a4d6c3c > Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:06:51 -0700 > Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > CommitDate: Mon, 23
2015 Feb 18
0
isohybrid and ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes vs. VirtualBox
> Hi, > > it would be interesting to know for what solution > TAILS decides and whether any problems arise with it. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > On with the fundamental discussion of MBR cylinders: > > Ady wrote: > > 1_ The resulting ISO9660 file system size shall be a multiple of 2048 > > (bytes_per_sector). > >
2014 Jun 24
2
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi, > > i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on > the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki. > > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid > > Review and proposals are appreciated. > > The reference to "above mkisofs command" anticipates the final > position of this text at the end
2015 Apr 05
4
Is efiboot.img required?
Hi, i wrote: > > Well, it is about really usable capabilities of isohybrid, Ady wrote: > but their practical combination, usage, effects, > goals... are not expressed clearly enough for the common user to put in > practice. How to express the embarrassing fact that ISOLINUX is not ready for UEFI but isohybrid is ? http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Isohybrid#UEFI would