Displaying 20 results from an estimated 465 matches for "isohybridization".
2014 Jun 21
2
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi,
>
> > Not being compatible with EFI/GPT is already a problem for the Perl
> > variant.
>
> The relation of both is:
>
> isohybrid.in/.pl is being left behind.
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/utils/Makefile
> has:
> SCRIPT_TARGETS += isohybrid.pl # about to be obsoleted
>
> isohybrid.c replaces it feature-wise
2014 Jun 20
3
[PATCH] isohybrid: fix overflow on 32 bit system
When call isohybrid with option '-u', it overflows on a 32 bits host. It
seeks to 512 bytes before the end of the image to install gpt header. If
the size of image is larger than LONG_MAX, it overflows fseek() and
cause error:
isohybrid: image-x86-64-20140505110100.iso: seek error - 8: Invalid argument
Replace fseek with fseeko to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang at
2010 Apr 12
2
Patch to port isohybrid.pl to isohybrid.c
Hello all,
Past few days I was working on porting the isohybrid perl script to c.
(-> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/ticket/15)
The first patch towards the same is attached with this mail. And the same could also be accessed
from: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/syslinux-3.86-isohybrid.patch
I would really appreciate it if somebody could have a look at it and let me know
2014 Jun 21
2
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi,
>
> Ady:
> > Since both included variants are currently different, and both
> > variants have problems
>
> I am not aware of problems of the perl version. It is just lacking
> the newer features which support EFI/GPT and Mac/APM.
> The known bugs of isohybrid.c are with those newer features.
> http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2012-May/017843.html
>
2012 Jun 09
5
Build failure for isohybrid
Dear list,
I have been trying to debug a build failure for a while in the utils
directory on isohybrid which seems to be distro specific.
On Fedora 17 64bit the build completes without problems, but under both
Ubuntu 32/64bit 11.10 and 12.04 I get the following:
tim at oxygen:/usr/src/git/syslinux/utils$ make
gcc -O2 -luuid -o isohybrid isohybrid.o isohdpfx.o
isohybrid.o: In function
2014 Jun 22
16
Announcing a patch series for isohybrid.c
Hi,
following will be 6 patch proposals for isohybrid.c
1: Encode GPT partition names as UTF-16LE
2: Correct blocking factor in APM partition block counts
3: Correct end block address of first GPT partition
4: Write GPT backup to the very end of the image
5: Change all fseek(3) to fseeko(3)
6: Introduce option --mbr and make isohybrid.c compilable standalone
If the form needs adjustments,
2014 May 12
4
[PATCH] isohybrid: fix overflow on 32 bit system
When call isohybrid with option '-u', it overflows on a 32 bits host. It
seeks to 512 bytes before the end of the image to install gpt header. If
the size of image is larger than LONG_MAX, it overflows fseek() and
cause error:
isohybrid: wrlinux-image-x86-64-20140505110100.iso: seek error - 8: Invalid argument
Check the offset and call fseek() multi-times if offset is too large.
2014 Jun 22
5
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi,
>
> > All the "isohybrid.exe" I know of are based on the Perl variant.
>
> I just got one from
> http://www.filewatcher.com/m/isohybrid.exe.39568-0.html
>
> Its strings seem not to stem from isohybrid.pl.
>
> Digging in slitaz source brought a shell script (that would be
> variant #5 then):
>
2015 Feb 17
0
isohybrid and ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes vs. VirtualBox
> Hi,
>
> at [Tails] we're in the process of shipping hybrid ISO images by
> default again. We're using `isohybrid -h 255 -s 63' to do that (thanks
> to the advice we got on this mailing-list a few months ago!).
>
> And then, we've discovered that sometimes, isohybrid produces ISO
> images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes.
>
> Who cares?
2015 Feb 17
2
isohybrid and ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes vs. VirtualBox
Hi,
at [Tails] we're in the process of shipping hybrid ISO images by
default again. We're using `isohybrid -h 255 -s 63' to do that (thanks
to the advice we got on this mailing-list a few months ago!).
And then, we've discovered that sometimes, isohybrid produces ISO
images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes.
Who cares? ... may you ask. Well, apparently, VirtualBox does:
2014 Jun 22
0
isohybrid has 2 variants
Hi,
> All the "isohybrid.exe" I know of are based on the Perl variant.
I just got one from
http://www.filewatcher.com/m/isohybrid.exe.39568-0.html
Its strings seem not to stem from isohybrid.pl.
Digging in slitaz source brought a shell script (that would be
variant #5 then):
http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/file/313b384e2a06/syslinux/stuff/tools/isohybrid.sh
But isohybrid.exe must
2014 Jun 21
4
isohybrid has 2 variants
>What I reminder from it:
>
> The first "isohybrid" was in perl.
> But that made perl a run-time dependency.
>
> A compiled version of "isohybrid" removed that
> run-time dependency on perl.
>
>
>What I think of it:
>
> The Perl variant of isohybrid should be removed
> from the source tree.
One advantage of the Perl one for me
2014 May 12
2
[PATCH] isohybrid: fix overflow on 32 bit system
On 2014?05?12? 10:49, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/11/2014 06:56 PM, Kai Kang wrote:
>> When call isohybrid with option '-u', it overflows on a 32 bits host. It
>> seeks to 512 bytes before the end of the image to install gpt header. If
>> the size of image is larger than LONG_MAX, it overflows fseek() and
>> cause error:
>>
>> isohybrid:
2014 May 13
2
[PATCH] isohybrid: fix overflow on 32 bit system
On 2014?05?12? 22:38, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> That is because it needs to use fseeko() and use off_t.
Do you mean it does need a patch for isohybrid.c. And the patch looks like:
#if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64
fseeko(...)
#else
fseek(...)
Regards,
Kai
>
> On May 11, 2014 11:53:17 PM PDT, Kang Kai <Kai.Kang at windriver.com> wrote:
>> On 2014?05?12? 10:49, H. Peter
2015 Feb 18
3
isohybrid and ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes vs. VirtualBox
Hi,
it would be interesting to know for what solution
TAILS decides and whether any problems arise with it.
-------------------------------------------------------
On with the fundamental discussion of MBR cylinders:
Ady wrote:
> 1_ The resulting ISO9660 file system size shall be a multiple of 2048
> (bytes_per_sector).
The known ISO production programs comply to this condition.
2014 Jun 21
0
isohybrid has 2 variants
Hi,
> Not being compatible with EFI/GPT is already a problem for the Perl
> variant.
The relation of both is:
isohybrid.in/.pl is being left behind.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/utils/Makefile
has:
SCRIPT_TARGETS += isohybrid.pl # about to be obsoleted
isohybrid.c replaces it feature-wise and adds new features.
Only those new features contain the bugs,
2014 Jun 24
2
[syslinux:master] isohybrid: Function to write UTF-16LE strings
Op 2014-06-23 om 20:09 schreef syslinux-bot for H. Peter Anvin:
> Commit-ID: f9dad5340bcefe34d860e991e8743be01a4d6c3c
> Gitweb: http://www.syslinux.org/commit/f9dad5340bcefe34d860e991e8743be01a4d6c3c
> Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:06:51 -0700
> Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com>
> CommitDate: Mon, 23
2015 Feb 18
0
isohybrid and ISO images whose size is not a multiple of 2048 bytes vs. VirtualBox
> Hi,
>
> it would be interesting to know for what solution
> TAILS decides and whether any problems arise with it.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> On with the fundamental discussion of MBR cylinders:
>
> Ady wrote:
> > 1_ The resulting ISO9660 file system size shall be a multiple of 2048
> > (bytes_per_sector).
>
>
2014 Jun 24
2
isohybrid has 2 variants
> Hi,
>
> i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on
> the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki.
>
> http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid
>
> Review and proposals are appreciated.
>
> The reference to "above mkisofs command" anticipates the final
> position of this text at the end
2015 Apr 05
4
Is efiboot.img required?
Hi,
i wrote:
> > Well, it is about really usable capabilities of isohybrid,
Ady wrote:
> but their practical combination, usage, effects,
> goals... are not expressed clearly enough for the common user to put in
> practice.
How to express the embarrassing fact that ISOLINUX is
not ready for UEFI but isohybrid is ?
http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Isohybrid#UEFI
would