search for: isohdppx_f

...syslinux itself) with the following files at least (found by git status in the gnu-efi submodule): gnu-efi-3.0/gnuefi/crt0-efi-ia32.o gnu-efi-3.0/lib/libefi.a After removing these and the bios, efi32 and efi64 subdirectories, the build failed ending with the following messages: [...] gcc -Wp,-MT,isohdppx_f.o,-MD,./.isohdppx_f.o.d -m32 -march=i386 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -msoft-float -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=0 -falign-ju...

...yslinux.git > > These changes fixed my issues (aside from the concurrency issue which > 2-3 passes solves for me). Now this shows me something I haven't ever seen. Build continuing in the background after the main process exits? wferi at lant:~/syslinux/genec$ make [...] gcc -Wp,-MT,isohdppx_f.o,-MD,./.isohdppx_f.o.d -m32 -march=i386 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -fno-stack-protector -fwrapv -freg-struct-return -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -msoft-float -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=0 -falign-ju...

Hi, The internal Gnu-EFI build gives me grief: * efi/check-gnu-efi.sh: uses realpath, which is not available on my Debian wheezy system. I now use readlink -f, but wonder if it's needed at all. * efi/build-gnu-efi.sh: uses realpath, like above, and also pushd/popd, which is not built into a standard Bourne shell invoked by #!/bin/sh. Again I wonder what's the point of it, as

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: > Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: >>> >>>> * make spotless still fails after working around

...is space _now_, > why not? I still agree. But while answering Ady's questions i get to a question of my own: Do all six fixed isohdp*.bin variations still fit into 432 bytes ? mbr/Makefile builds among other MBRs: isohdpfx.bin isohdppx.bin isohdpfx_c.bin isohdppx_c.bin isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin Their purpose is explained in the table at http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=Isohybrid#MBR_selection Have a nice day :) Thomas

....7095396 100644 --- a/mbr/Makefile +++ b/mbr/Makefile @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ include $(MAKEDIR)/embedded.mk all: mbr.bin altmbr.bin gptmbr.bin isohdpfx.bin isohdppx.bin \ mbr_c.bin altmbr_c.bin gptmbr_c.bin isohdpfx_c.bin isohdppx_c.bin \ - mbr_f.bin altmbr_f.bin gptmbr_f.bin isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin + mbr_f.bin altmbr_f.bin gptmbr_f.bin isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin \ + isohdpfv.bin isohdppv.bin %.o: %.S $(CC) $(MAKEDEPS) $(SFLAGS) -Wa,-a=$*.lst -c -o $@ $< diff --git a/mbr/checksize.pl b/mbr/checksize.pl index 4b42327..1fb2a86 100755 --- a/mbr/checksize.pl +++ b/mbr/checksize.pl @...

Hi, On 23/06/2014 12:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote:> Hi, > > i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on > the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki. > > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid > > Review and proposals are appreciated. Caveat emptor: this is a review by an end user (not a developer), who

...OKEN/utils/Makefile 2016-03-04 17:24:16.387537657 +0100 @@ -28,17 +28,17 @@ ASIS = $(addprefix $(SRC)/,keytab-lilo TARGETS = $(C_TARGETS) $(SCRIPT_TARGETS) -ISOHDPFX = $(addprefix $(OBJ)/,../mbr/isohdpfx.bin ../mbr/isohdpfx_f.bin \ - ../mbr/isohdpfx_c.bin \ - ../mbr/isohdppx.bin ../mbr/isohdppx_f.bin ../mbr/isohdppx_c.bin) +ISOHDPFX = $(addprefix $(OBJ)/,../bios/mbr/isohdpfx.bin ../bios/mbr/isohdpfx_f.bin \ + ../bios/mbr/isohdpfx_c.bin \ + ../bios/mbr/isohdppx.bin ../bios/mbr/isohdppx_f.bin ../bios/mbr/isohdppx_c.bin) all: $(TARGETS) %.o: %.c $(CC) $(UMAKEDEPS) $(CFLAGS) -c -o...

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:13:28PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > Do all six fixed isohdp*.bin variations still fit into 432 bytes ? > > mbr/Makefile builds among other MBRs: > isohdpfx.bin isohdppx.bin isohdpfx_c.bin isohdppx_c.bin > isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin Yes. I make my changes in my syslinux git clone. All of the above is build from isohdpfx.S with different #defines active. Building them runs a check with checksize.pl that fails if they go beyond what's defined in checksize.pl. That does not fail for me. Thomas, if you're intereste...

> Hi, > > i wrote: > > > I think it still has good reason to exist. > > Ady wrote: > > Would you please clarify what do you mean with "it"? > > "It" was the code part about > > xor %cx, %cx /* Clear EBIOS flag. */ > > which Martin mentioned as "can be ignored" in the the text which i > quoted

...p 22 22:23 modules/poweroff.com 1 408 Sep 22 22:25 dosutil/copybs.com 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdpfx.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdpfx_c.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdpfx_f.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdppx.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdppx_c.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdppx_f.bin 1 439 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/altmbr.bin 1 439 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/altmbr_c.bin 1 439 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/altmbr_f.bin 1 440 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/gptmbr.bin 1 440 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/gptmbr_c.bin 1 440 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/gptmbr_f.bin 1 440 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/mbr.bin 1 440 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/mbr_c...

...-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdpfx_f.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx_c.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx_f.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45056 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isolinux.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45056 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isolinux-debug.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 440 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/mbr.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 440 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/...

...root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdpfx_f.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx_c.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx_f.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45056 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isolinux.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45056 May 14 22:44 > /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isolinux-debug.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 440 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/mbr.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 440 May 14...

Hi On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On May 19, 2014 5:17 PM, "Anatol Pomozov" <anatol.pomozov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Besides syslinux itself other things has changed e.g. gcc (but I >> really hope my problem not because of compiler). > > This alone can be the trigger.This might be a starting point: build