search for: isohdpfx_c

...n better safe than sorry, and given that there is space _now_, > why not? I still agree. But while answering Ady's questions i get to a question of my own: Do all six fixed isohdp*.bin variations still fit into 432 bytes ? mbr/Makefile builds among other MBRs: isohdpfx.bin isohdppx.bin isohdpfx_c.bin isohdppx_c.bin isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin Their purpose is explained in the table at http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=Isohybrid#MBR_selection Have a nice day :) Thomas

...7:21:56.879041790 +0100 +++ syslinux-6.04-pre1-BROKEN/utils/Makefile 2016-03-04 17:24:16.387537657 +0100 @@ -28,17 +28,17 @@ ASIS = $(addprefix $(SRC)/,keytab-lilo TARGETS = $(C_TARGETS) $(SCRIPT_TARGETS) -ISOHDPFX = $(addprefix $(OBJ)/,../mbr/isohdpfx.bin ../mbr/isohdpfx_f.bin \ - ../mbr/isohdpfx_c.bin \ - ../mbr/isohdppx.bin ../mbr/isohdppx_f.bin ../mbr/isohdppx_c.bin) +ISOHDPFX = $(addprefix $(OBJ)/,../bios/mbr/isohdpfx.bin ../bios/mbr/isohdpfx_f.bin \ + ../bios/mbr/isohdpfx_c.bin \ + ../bios/mbr/isohdppx.bin ../bios/mbr/isohdppx_f.bin ../bios/mbr/isohdppx_c.bin) all: $(TARGETS)...

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:13:28PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > Do all six fixed isohdp*.bin variations still fit into 432 bytes ? > > mbr/Makefile builds among other MBRs: > isohdpfx.bin isohdppx.bin isohdpfx_c.bin isohdppx_c.bin > isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin Yes. I make my changes in my syslinux git clone. All of the above is build from isohdpfx.S with different #defines active. Building them runs a check with checksize.pl that fails if they go beyond what's defined in checksize.pl. That doe...

...dd.ltu.se> --- Comments? diff --git a/mbr/Makefile b/mbr/Makefile index be2bded..7095396 100644 --- a/mbr/Makefile +++ b/mbr/Makefile @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ include $(MAKEDIR)/embedded.mk all: mbr.bin altmbr.bin gptmbr.bin isohdpfx.bin isohdppx.bin \ mbr_c.bin altmbr_c.bin gptmbr_c.bin isohdpfx_c.bin isohdppx_c.bin \ - mbr_f.bin altmbr_f.bin gptmbr_f.bin isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin + mbr_f.bin altmbr_f.bin gptmbr_f.bin isohdpfx_f.bin isohdppx_f.bin \ + isohdpfv.bin isohdppv.bin %.o: %.S $(CC) $(MAKEDEPS) $(SFLAGS) -Wa,-a=$*.lst -c -o $@ $< diff --git a/mbr/checksize.pl b/mbr/check...

...inux/syslinux/mbr/i386/mbr.ld -e _start -o isohdppx_f.elf isohdppx_f.o objcopy -O binary isohdppx_f.elf isohdppx_f.bin perl /home/wferi/syslinux/syslinux/mbr/checksize.pl isohdppx_f.bin chmod -x isohdppx_f.bin rm mbr_f.o isohdppx_c.o altmbr_c.o isohdppx_f.o gptmbr_c.o isohdppx.o altmbr_f.o altmbr.o isohdpfx_c.o mbr_c.o gptmbr_f.o gptmbr.o isohdpfx_f.o isohdpfx.o mbr.o make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/wferi/syslinux/syslinux/efi32/mbr' make -r -C sample SRC="/home/wferi/syslinux/syslinux/sample" OBJ="/home/wferi/syslinux/syslinux/efi32/sample" \ -f /home/wferi/syslinux/syslinux...

> Hi, > > i wrote: > > > I think it still has good reason to exist. > > Ady wrote: > > Would you please clarify what do you mean with "it"? > > "It" was the code part about > > xor %cx, %cx /* Clear EBIOS flag. */ > > which Martin mentioned as "can be ignored" in the the text which i > quoted

...nt. 4.06: 1 55 Sep 22 22:23 modules/int18.com 1 108 Nov 1 18:07 version.mk 1 138 Nov 1 18:07 version.gen 1 138 Nov 1 18:07 version.h 1 239 Sep 22 22:23 modules/poweroff.com 1 408 Sep 22 22:25 dosutil/copybs.com 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdpfx.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdpfx_c.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdpfx_f.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdppx.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdppx_c.bin 1 432 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/isohdppx_f.bin 1 439 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/altmbr.bin 1 439 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/altmbr_c.bin 1 439 Sep 23 23:51 mbr/altmbr_f.bin 1 440 Sep 23 23...

...-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 440 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/gptmbr_c.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 440 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/gptmbr_f.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdpfx.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdpfx_c.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdpfx_f.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx_c.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslin...

Hi, On 23/06/2014 12:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote:> Hi, > > i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on > the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki. > > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid > > Review and proposals are appreciated. Caveat emptor: this is a review by an end user (not a developer), who

...oot root 440 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/gptmbr_c.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 440 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/gptmbr_f.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdpfx.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdpfx_c.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdpfx_f.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 22:44 /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/isohdppx_c.bin > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 432 May 14 2...

Hi On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On May 19, 2014 5:17 PM, "Anatol Pomozov" <anatol.pomozov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Besides syslinux itself other things has changed e.g. gcc (but I >> really hope my problem not because of compiler). > > This alone can be the trigger.This might be a starting point: build

...i/syslinux/genec/mbr/i386/mbr.ld -e _start -o isohdppx_f.elf isohdppx_f.o objcopy -O binary isohdppx_f.elf isohdppx_f.bin perl /home/wferi/syslinux/genec/mbr/checksize.pl isohdppx_f.bin chmod -x isohdppx_f.bin rm mbr_f.o isohdppx_c.o altmbr_c.o isohdppx_f.o gptmbr_c.o isohdppx.o altmbr_f.o altmbr.o isohdpfx_c.o mbr_c.o gptmbr_f.o gptmbr.o isohdpfx_f.o isohdpfx.o mbr.o make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/wferi/syslinux/genec/efi32/mbr' make -r -C sample SRC="/home/wferi/syslinux/genec/sample" OBJ="/home/wferi/syslinux/genec/efi32/sample" \ -f /home/wferi/syslinux/genec/sample/Make...

Hi, The internal Gnu-EFI build gives me grief: * efi/check-gnu-efi.sh: uses realpath, which is not available on my Debian wheezy system. I now use readlink -f, but wonder if it's needed at all. * efi/build-gnu-efi.sh: uses realpath, like above, and also pushd/popd, which is not built into a standard Bourne shell invoked by #!/bin/sh. Again I wonder what's the point of it, as

...eb97a..993bb10 100644 --- a/mbr/Makefile +++ b/mbr/Makefile @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ # topdir = .. -include $(topdir)/MCONFIG.embedded +MAKEDIR = $(topdir)/mk +include $(MAKEDIR)/embedded.mk all: mbr.bin altmbr.bin gptmbr.bin isohdpfx.bin isohdppx.bin \ mbr_c.bin altmbr_c.bin gptmbr_c.bin isohdpfx_c.bin isohdppx_c.bin \ diff --git a/memdisk/Makefile b/memdisk/Makefile index 92f565a..5475b44 100644 --- a/memdisk/Makefile +++ b/memdisk/Makefile @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ ## ----------------------------------------------------------------------- topdir = .. -include $(topdir)/MCONFIG.embedded +MAKEDIR...

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: > Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: >>> >>>> * make spotless still fails after working around

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at linux.intel.com> This series includes a patch (PATCH 1/6) that I sent previously but I thought it was worth sending it again since the rest of the series depends on it, and it also gives a bit of context. These cleanups make it simpler to do the big switchover to ELF modules on the elflink branch because the libraries in $LIBS are now contained in one