Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9118 matches for "isns".
Did you mean:
ins
2010 Feb 19
1
ocfs2 filesystem R/O in one node but not in the 2nd.
Hello folks,
I have a Filesystem that went R/O in one node but not in the second
here is the output of the following command on the node with the R/O issue:
fsck.ocfs2 -fn /dev/dm-23
Checking OCFS2 filesystem in /dev/dm-23:
label: oraCRSMeta
uuid: 71 df 25 70 8b 34 43 f8 a4 e7 cd 2c c5 66 84 27
number of blocks: 2209680
bytes per block: 4096
2012 Sep 10
9
issue using SRIOV "Unable to start - perhaps the PF driver is not up yet", while PF driver is actually up
Hi,
I am trying to use SRIOV, usnig xen 4.0 on debian.
On my dom0, xm pci-list-assignable-devices show that
0000:0f:10.0
0000:0f:10.2
0000:0f:10.4
0000:0f:10.6
0000:0f:11.2
0000:0f:11.4
0000:0f:11.6
these virtual interfaces correspond to eth2,
i attach 0f:10.0 to a domU ubuntu machine, xm pci-attach ubuntu 0f:10.0
on my dom0 machine, i can ping other machine using eth2, (implying PF on
eth2
2012 Sep 10
9
issue using SRIOV "Unable to start - perhaps the PF driver is not up yet", while PF driver is actually up
Hi,
I am trying to use SRIOV, usnig xen 4.0 on debian.
On my dom0, xm pci-list-assignable-devices show that
0000:0f:10.0
0000:0f:10.2
0000:0f:10.4
0000:0f:10.6
0000:0f:11.2
0000:0f:11.4
0000:0f:11.6
these virtual interfaces correspond to eth2,
i attach 0f:10.0 to a domU ubuntu machine, xm pci-attach ubuntu 0f:10.0
on my dom0 machine, i can ping other machine using eth2, (implying PF on
eth2
2002 Nov 21
0
Initial Sequence Numbers (ISN) vulnerability
...ng a Raptor Firewall, see
http://www.symantec.com/techsupp/bulletin/archive/firewall/082002firewall.ht
ml
or else contact your vendor for a patch
Risk factor : High
---end---
1) Could Shorewall be contributing this problem? I don''t understand
what the role of a firewall is in generating ISNs.
2) Does shorewall implicitly defend against spoofing?
Thanks.
David
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@shorewall.net
http://www.shorewall.net/mailman/listinfo/shorewall-users
2004 Feb 09
1
htb: class isn''t work conserving ?!
I am seeing a lot of messages like this on my console and in
/var/log/messages:
Feb 9 19:27:55 rnsa kernel: htb: class 20001 isn''t work conserving ?!
The class it''s referring to is the only subclass of an HTB qdisc. Can
anyone tell me why HTB would complain in this way? If I understand
correctly, HTB isn''t a work-conserving qdisc anyway.
2010 Sep 02
5
what is zfs doing during a log resilver?
So, when you add a log device to a pool, it initiates a resilver.
What is it actually doing, though? Isn''t the slog a copy of the
in-memory intent log? Wouldn''t it just simply replicate the data that''s
in the other log, checked against what''s in RAM? And presumably there
isn''t that much data in the slog so there isn''t that much to check?
Or
2008 Oct 06
7
Matching *, + and # in the dialplan
In several places online, and in the Asterisk F.O.T. book, there is a
warning against using '_.' saying:
"[it] should probably never be used".
However, the need often arises act on numeric extensions that begin with
*'s and #'s, and '+', and of course _X. does not match
I have tried exten => _[0-9*#+]. but that seems to be the functional
equivalent to _X.
2010 Apr 29
1
Issue with (pattern) matching extension
Here's a segment of my dialplan, I'm working on the freenum/ISN
functionality:
same => n,Set(isnresult=${ENUMLOOKUP(${EXTEN},sip,,1,freenum.org)})
same => n,GotoIf($["${isnresult}" != ""]?:fn-CONGESTION,1)
; set up our outgoing call state
same => n,Set(SIPFROMUSER=${CALLERID(num)})
same => n,GotoIf($["${GLOBAL(FREENUMDOMAIN)}" ==
2007 Sep 14
4
Can Asterisk match a literal "*" in extensions.conf
I am working on getting freenum.org ISN/ITAD numbers integrated into my
exiting dialplan however I am having trouble getting the extension matches to
work "as expected."
I would like to be able to do something like:
exten => _X.*.,1,Macro(isn-outbound...)
Where I would expect that any extension that starts with at least one number,
but includes a literal "*" followed by
2010 Mar 21
2
Bug#574858: logcheck: Does not ignore unresolvable hostname
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.3.7
Severity: normal
After installing logcheck on a system it posted an error to the cron
mail address hourly. An untrapped script error was posting stderr
output to cron. It originated here:
# Hostname either fully qualified or not.
if [ $FQDN -eq 1 ]; then
HOSTNAME="$(hostname --fqdn)" > /dev/null 2>&1
else
2005 May 13
1
When .. isnt the same? (not a problem
I don?t understand why ".." isn?t working the same way for "ls" and "cd" when inside
a symbolic link. The reason I ask is that I made a link to a directory with some
scripts that saves output in "../output.txt" and I could not find the output until I
found that ".." isn?t the directory you see when you do a $pwd. I solved the problem
by making a
2013 Jul 03
6
revert commit e4fd0475 ("hvmloader: always include HPET table")
Windows SVVP tests requiring a HPET ACPI table is in my opinion
not a valid reason to always expose that table - respective tests
should be run with "hpet=1" in the guest config file.
The problem here is that at least with qemu-traditional, which
by default doesn''t appear to emulate a HPET, the advertising
here can mislead an OS to believe that there actually is a usable
HPET,
2006 Jul 13
6
Content_for_layout
Question- if I have more then one view I wish to display in a layout , how
do I tell content_for_layout what to display and where ?
TIA
Stuart
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060713/a2d0a8c8/attachment.html
2006 Mar 21
13
Double and single quote usage in AWDWR
Hello everyone!
I''ve noticed, that the book uses double quotes almost everywhere. It is like
<%= javascript_include_tag "prototype" %>
I''ve checked the "programming ruby, 2ed" book and found that double
quotes are most suited when escape sequences and substitutions are
required. Isn''t it more semantically correct to write this code like
2007 Jun 25
1
Xen 3.1 and network card RTL-8169SC isn''t working
Hello all,
I have a network card "Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169SC Gigabit
Ethernet" in my machine. It''s working fine with xen 3.0.3 but with xen
3.1compilled from source isn''t working. I''m using Debian lenny. Any
suggestion?
Regards
--
Marco Sinhoreli
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
2007 Sep 19
0
Error: Disk isn''t accessible
Hi everybody,
Its the first time today that i am using XEN. And unfortunately the things
did''nt run smoothly. I am trying since the past 2 days to run a VM under XEN
but i am not able to get rid of the following error:
Error: Disk isn''t accessible
I have searched around on the net but without success. Below is my Config
file for the VM:
name=''slc4''
2006 Oct 30
1
Anyone got a dialplan for SPA ATAs for ISN?
After John Todd's talk at Astricon about the ISN project, I spent much
of the weekend playing around with it.
I have discovered that the default dialplans on my Sipura gear, as well
as my Grandstream phones, intercept the "*" key that is a required part
of ISN numbers and interpret it as a "metacharacter."
Googling for a while has turned up evidence that this can be
2009 Jul 20
0
Vote on whether SipPhone should support ISN routing.
Should SipPhone support ISN routing for their 747 ITAD? Cast a vote:
http://forums.gizmo5.com/viewtopic.php?t=10197
Meanwhile if you're interested, you can use the Nerd Vittles 'bandit' ITAD
#1089 to call a SipPhone/Gizmo5 subscriber via ISN, which I think is clever
(Karl tips his hat to Ward Mundy) and it's also really, really funny.
2004 Sep 02
1
UPDATE: File isn''t in mbox format: /var/mail/user1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dovecot-bounces@dovecot.org
> [mailto:dovecot-bounces@dovecot.org]On
> Behalf Of Zoong Pham
> Sent: Thursday, 2 September 2004 4:09 PM
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: [Dovecot] File isn''t in mbox format: /var/mail/user1
>
> I lately see lots of message like this in my maillog:
>
> Sep 1 11:12:31 onion pop3-login:
2004 May 14
2
Fwd: [ISN] Voice Over IP Can Be Vulnerable To Hackers, Too
Hope this isn't too far OT, but its relevant to us. From isn.attrition.org
>http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=20300851
>
>By W. David Gardner
>TechWeb News
>May 13, 2004
>
>As voice over IP sweeps across the high-tech landscape, many IT
>managers are being lulled into a dangerous complacency because they
>look upon Internet phoning