search for: isnodehidden

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "isnodehidden".

2012 May 31
2
[LLVMdev] DFG of machine functions
...aph<llvm::MachineFunction*>]’ /home/abhi/work/llvm31/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MC_DFG.cpp:249: instantiated from here */home/abhi/work/llvm31/llvm/include/llvm/Support/GraphWriter.h:139: error: no matching function for call to ‘llvm::GraphWriter<llvm::MCDFGraph<llvm::MachineFunction*> >::isNodeHidden(llvm::MachineInstr&)’* */home/abhi/work/llvm31/llvm/include/llvm/Support/GraphWriter.h:143: note: candidates are: bool llvm::GraphWriter<GraphType>::isNodeHidden(typename llvm::GraphTraits<T>::NodeType&) [with GraphType = llvm::MCDFGraph<llvm::MachineFunction*>]* */home/ab...
2012 Jun 02
0
[LLVMdev] DFG of machine functions
...uild error output: /home/arhishee/work/llvm-3.1.src/include/llvm/Support/GraphWriter.h:143:8: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'IIty' (aka 'llvm::MachineInstr') to 'NodeType &' (aka 'llvm::Value &') for 1st argument; bool isNodeHidden(NodeType &Node) { ^ /home/arhishee/work/llvm-3.1.src/include/llvm/Support/GraphWriter.h:147:8: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'IIty' (aka 'llvm::MachineInstr') to 'NodeType *const *' (aka 'llvm::Value *const *') for 1st...
2009 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Edwin, thanks, it starts making sense inline comments... Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-09-06 19:57, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > >> Edwin, >> >> thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand. >> Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored >> in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the
2009 Sep 06
3
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On 2009-09-06 19:57, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Edwin, > > thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand. > Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored > in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the > graph in order to visit all nodes? (and what happens when you have > disjointed DFGs?). Sorry for the