Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "islogaltofold".
Did you mean:
islegaltofold
2010 Feb 22
3
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG legality: isel creating cycles
...?
> > Can I get a testcase?
>
> I'll see if I can generate one and file a PR.
Ah, isLegalToFold saves us on trunk. But we lose folding due to prefetching,
which is unfortunate.
I am seeing the error with 2.5 (yes, we are upgrading!).
I guess I'll have to backport some of the isLogalToFold logic.
-Dave
2010 Feb 22
0
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG legality: isel creating cycles
Hello, David
> Ah, isLegalToFold saves us on trunk. But we lose folding due to prefetching,
> which is unfortunate.
>
> I am seeing the error with 2.5 (yes, we are upgrading!).
>
> I guess I'll have to backport some of the isLogalToFold logic.
There was x86-only code at pre-2.6 times which was later moved into
generic hook named "isLegalAndProfitableToFold". You might want to
backport just that part.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2010 Feb 22
2
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG legality: isel creating cycles
On Feb 22, 2010, at 8:41 AM, David Greene wrote:
> On Monday 22 February 2010 10:31:24 David Greene wrote:
>
>> The fundamental issue is that the DAG originally looked like this:
>>
>> MIN
>> LOAD B
>> PREFETCH
>> Chain from LOAD A
>> LOAD A
>
> Actually, it looked like this:
>
> MIN
> LOAD B
> Chain from PREFETCH
2010 Feb 22
0
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG legality: isel creating cycles
On Monday 22 February 2010 13:06:39 Chris Lattner wrote:
> > Just wanted to clarify in case someone was wondering about this.
>
> I'm currently working in this area. What pattern is causing the cycle?
> Can I get a testcase?
I'll see if I can generate one and file a PR.
-Dave